100% on your specific points, but there is still nuance and disagreement. Many vegans own and feed obligate carnivores. Not all vegans are comfortable eating figs that need pollination. There are varied opinions on zoos.

Yeah, they're definitely the vinegar and not the honey.

It's not a black and white issue, I agree. But vegan extremists, like most of /r/vegan, can't admit that. A video of a guy eating eggs from chickens he's met, know are family pets, and see are well cared for? BURN THE WITCH.

Half these vegan shitheads probably have an obligate carnivore at home that they gleefully feed fish and poultry every day.

Extremists gonna harass. Such is life.

Yeah, I think going to vegan-focused events was a bad idea. Pet-related events would be a much better idea because most pet owners understand livestock animals can be treated well (not that most of them are).

Of course, most pet-owning vegans don't admit how hypocritical they are or that their beloved PETA wants to eradicate pets.

Can you show us a bill that's been passed into law that implements policy as this so called "cult of intersectionality" you invented intends to do?

Of course not. And their ads violate the same rule that was used as an excuse to boot the ASS Club.

Orthodontist on TikTok says he graduated with 1 million in student loans. Not sure if that's normal, but it sounds like trickle down economics to me. Charge the dentist a million to get a job, they charge $1500 for crowns.

I couldn't remember what I paid years ago and wanted to underestimate so people didn't cry about that.

Sure, but a crown still costs $500. That's almost a full week of work, just to keep your job, assuming you only have one bad tooth.

> Apparently, since the striking workers aren’t actually working, Temple is able to withhold benefits?

Typically, this only applies to benefits accrued through working. They're pulling all benefits, even tuition reimbursement which was already paid. IANAL, but several who've spoken on the issue say it's a legal difference.

I've also seen 🤍💙 but never 🦴🦵🍮

Fair enough. We have different opinions but I understand yours. Cheers!

And you're satisfied with the opposite being true? A multi-millionare can kill you and pay your family his pocket change?

It's already unfair, just like flat rate speeding tickets. The rich can commit the crime more laissez faire because the impact of the punishment on them doesn't phase them.

Will this be enough to keep the abortion amendment from making the ballot? My understanding is that it has to be approved by two successive congresses and I'm hoping this one won't approve it.

"Maintain the child's standard of living" would lead to some interesting inequities. If a rich person kills a poor parent, their child support payments would be much less than if a poor person killed a rich parent.

It would be more appropriate to base it on the criminal's income or simply have the criminal pay for the survivors' benefits the government will already be paying.

I'm not sure if it's true or not, but people believe IG's algorithm deprioritizes posts that mention "violent" or sexual words like kill, suicide, OnlyFans, etc. There's a lot of words people censor over there or use "cute" alternatives like "unalive" or "🌽⭐"