Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

fenuxjde t1_j2swbyj wrote

Hasn't ignoring the will of the voters been the GOP playbook for like 70 years now?

191

eMPereb t1_j2tt5gs wrote

Ahh it’s the πŸ€‘πŸ’©β€™s playbook

12

ryeley323 t1_j2t9bhl wrote

You should look up how the parties voted for the civil rights acts of 58, 60 and 64.

−120

discogeek t1_j2tc8wr wrote

Yup, all those southern Democrats abandoned the party and swapped to GOP because of these bills, as seen by the plummeting number of Democrats that hated these bills and the constant rise of Republican opposition.

Not sure what your point is here, you're highlighting that the evolution of partisan racism in America was fueled with a mass exodus of anti-rights politicians from D to R.

But you be you and keep living in one snapshot of the past.

96

ryeley323 t1_j2tclr6 wrote

Oh yea you're talking about the dixiecrats. Yea that was 1948. 3 dixiecrats moved to the republican side and the rest were absorbed back into the democratic party.

−75

discogeek t1_j2tdv8r wrote

And they're still Democrats? C'mon, quit being a troll making up arguments that don't hold water. You and I and everyone in the world all know your argument is fake, referencing one year ignores the political movement of southern realignment completely.

I'd expect better intellectual discourse from someone who wants to discuss politics, but I guess it's pretty clear you're not here to discuss, just to own the libs.

You be you.

66

ryeley323 t1_j2tgwpc wrote

So, then you can give us the history of the southern realignment?

−62

discogeek t1_j2th5ut wrote

I wrote a comprehensive published paper on it in grad school, yes I can talk with authority on this topic.

56

Lunamothknits t1_j2thh6w wrote

Gosh. I bet they don’t reply back. πŸ˜‚πŸ’πŸ»β€β™€οΈ

22

underwear11 t1_j2u2dn7 wrote

Would have been awesome if they just posted a link to their paper upon any reply.

8

Radack1 t1_j2u7enx wrote

Ngl would love to get a look at this if it's accessible online. Ik a reasonable amount about that period but not as much as id like to

9

fenuxjde t1_j2talyc wrote

60 years, sorry. Sometimes I forget to carry the one.

24

ryeley323 t1_j2tauru wrote

Yea you didn't look that it was democrats that objected most of the civil liberties we have today.

−34

all4whatnot t1_j2tdx60 wrote

Times have changed. A lot. If you are trying to say that the R’s are the current party of progress you are sadly blinded by something.

50

crispydukes t1_j2wg7rb wrote

>If you are trying to say that the R’s are the current party of progress you are sadly blinded by something.

This right here. Look at the political party that currently aligns with the KKK, Neo-nazis, confederate apologists, covert racists, fascists, authoritarians, etc. Spoiler alert: it's the Republican party.

3

ryeley323 t1_j2teb16 wrote

Equal liberties? Certainly not the D.

−17

bk1285 t1_j2u056b wrote

The republicans that get held up as the greatness of the party, Teddy Roosevelt and Lincoln would not be republicans today

11

ryeley323 t1_j2u0g3t wrote

JFK would be rolling in his grave too. Both parties suck. Bottom line.

−1

bk1285 t1_j2uswl3 wrote

BoTh SiDeS aRe BaD

10

[deleted] t1_j2uwhu9 wrote

[removed]

0

[deleted] t1_j2uwsi3 wrote

[removed]

2

[deleted] t1_j2uzuk4 wrote

[removed]

1

[deleted] t1_j2uzxzh wrote

[removed]

2

[deleted] t1_j2v04q0 wrote

[removed]

1

defusted t1_j2td48k wrote

Why is it that every time the civil rights movement comes up there is always some asshole who conveniently forgets the pivot of the two parties in 1964. The Democrats who opposed the civil rights movement of the 60s are the current Republican party. You assholes aren't the party of Lincoln, you're the party of trump. Stop trying to tell people the Democrats are the real racists when it's the GOP that gets the support of the KKK and other domestic terrorists groups.

27

tyrael459 t1_j2tibvg wrote

But the take away is: What the fuck is your point? I wasn’t a democrat back then. I wasn’t even alive back then. Why the fuck does it matter what democrats voted for in the 40s in terms of what the parties stand for today aside from academic trivia? It’s clearly not what democrats stand for today.

I sure hope you’re not someone who gets their knickers in a twist when stuff like reparations and history lessons about slavery making people β€œfeel bad” hit the headlines, because you’re essentially advocating for people today being tied to what people 80 years ago did as a fucked-up β€œgotcha” piece of garbage.

21

ryeley323 t1_j2tkipi wrote

Relax. Reading up on the southern strategy now. Sounds eerily familiar to what's happening today. Sounds like history is repeating itself. Looks like your knickers are twisted.

−2

discogeek t1_j2trkg9 wrote

Do you want my paper on the topic? :D

14

ryeley323 t1_j2trwv3 wrote

I'd read it.

2

discogeek t1_j2tv2fo wrote

Honestly, it's a fascinating topic and I'm happy to answer any questions you'd have - Wikipedia has some basic info. I've debated doing a YouTube channel with stuff like this for years too but I'm no good at video editing.

The paper compared the 1934 / 1964 / 1994 elections and analyzed them as realignment years. (My conclusion was these were massive "wave" elections like 2010 and 2018 but realignments are generational and not able to pinpoint to one specific event.)

I'm happy to discuss the academics behind it with you or anyone interested. Don't ask me to dig up the old statistical regressions or plot charts though, I'd have to go to the attic to find the original paper.

13

ryeley323 t1_j2txahw wrote

Awesome. I'm greatly appreciative. Just a FYI I'm not anti democrat or pro Republican. I just absolutely hate political posts on this sub.

3

underwear11 t1_j2u2pit wrote

Ignoring the politics is exactly how bad things happen.

5

ryeley323 t1_j2u49b2 wrote

r/pennsylvaniapolitics

Problem solved.

1

underwear11 t1_j2u73p7 wrote

I'll expand my statement. Ignoring basic rights violations because you don't like "politics" is how bad things happen.

4

ryeley323 t1_j2u7z1n wrote

Who's rights are being violated? Never said I don't like politics. Just feel there's a better place to discuss them than this sub. Such as...... You guessed it. r/pennsylvaniapolitics

1

underwear11 t1_j2u84b6 wrote

Is the ability to vote for your representatives not a right?

2

ryeley323 t1_j2u90xs wrote

Umm. Yea. Are we on the same page?

1

underwear11 t1_j2ua74l wrote

Great! We're on the same page so far. Would you say that obstructing the ability to vote or perform an election would be a violation to that right?

2

ryeley323 t1_j2ub802 wrote

Listen, if you're telling me that someone thats registered, has a valid ID and a polling place is somehow being prevented from voting. I'm not hearing it.

0

underwear11 t1_j2ujm8r wrote

Worse! They are actively trying to stall the entire election so they maintain majority.

2

discogeek t1_j2u5mgt wrote

No worries at all. I don't hide it, I'm a Democrat and very politically active. Husband is a big MAGA Trump Republican, so I don't put political positions and good social interaction on the same side of the equation.

3

ryeley323 t1_j2u76v6 wrote

That's awesome especially in today's world. I'm personally an independent that leans conservative but will always give a hand to those in need. We're all human and having different opinions makes us who we are. The world would be boring if we all had the same views. My apologies if I came off hostel earlier. I am just a big teddy bear in real life.

2

discogeek t1_j2u8nme wrote

It's Reddit and easy to feel like you're going overboard sometimes. I'm sure if I ever had the privilege of meeting you and yours in person I'd be buying the first round of beers.

Bet you and the husband would have a long discussion about hunting.

2

ryeley323 t1_j2u9mb5 wrote

First, it would be my privilege. Second I'm sure we could play paper, rock scissor to see who buys the first round.

2

tyrael459 t1_j2tm2ce wrote

In other words, no response of substance to what your actual point is supposed to be, just pointless projection about knickers?

13

ryeley323 t1_j2tmegb wrote

Did you read the first comment dip shit?

0

tyrael459 t1_j2tt32l wrote

Alright, first comment, let’s see… other dude said GOP has ignored the will of the voters for 70 years. You chime in that the democrats voted against Civil Rights back in the 50s and 60s.

Again, so the fuck what? What the actual fuck does that have to do with anything the Democrats are doing right now? The other guy’s comment had a clear through line between history and contemporary GOP voting patterns, while your comment is a petulant β€œbut all these mostly dead dudes from the Democrat party of 70 years ago made these terrible votes.”

You have a bad day and just need to blow off steam or something? There’s no fucking point other β€œI know you are but what am I,” with the ridiculous topping of using examples from 70 fucking years ago.

10

ryeley323 t1_j2tup9h wrote

Lmao. Ruffled your feathers. Don't you have some world of war craft to play? Or twizzle you man bun up in cute flower?

0

tyrael459 t1_j2twruw wrote

So again, no actual response. What a joke. Pathetic.

5

ryeley323 t1_j2txm64 wrote

Na, not gonna waste time on you. Anyone who has to use Fuck two dozen times in two posts probably doesn't have any insight on yhe subject anyways. You're a loser who plays WoW. That's all I need to know.

1

tyrael459 t1_j2txs8z wrote

I think everyone following this thread knows who the loser is.

3

ryeley323 t1_j2ty4f7 wrote

Lmao!!! That's the difference between you and I. I don't have feelings. I dont care what others think. Enjoy!

1

tyrael459 t1_j2tycsm wrote

You don’t have feelings? Dang, man, I didn’t realize. Honestly, I’m sorry. I don’t know why anyone would say something like that seemingly with pride.

2

ryeley323 t1_j2tysvu wrote

Dam tootin. Will never lose a wink of sleep over what internet strangers think. You should try it.

1

tyrael459 t1_j2u1kuk wrote

Not me, sorry. I will admit that I have feelings, even when it comes to internet strangers. We’re all human and should just try to help one another. Sorry for the fucks.

3

ryeley323 t1_j2u2dzq wrote

No worries. I swear too but I really have no feelings. I'll help anyone who's willing to help themselves. That's why I'm reading up on Southern strategy and even a fellow redditor is sending me a comprehensive paper they wrote on the subject in college. I'm not anti Democrat or even pro republican. Frankly both parties suck. All good man. Sleep well!

1

tyrael459 t1_j2u3261 wrote

Thanks, man, same!

3

ryeley323 t1_j2u862k wrote

You ever make it to the Laurel highlands, hit me up. I'll buy the first round and we can have a civil debate.

1

--Cr1imsoN-- t1_j2trvnw wrote

You're just going to blantantly ignore the party switch and Southern strategy aint cha...

I'll tell you one thing. It's not the Democrats waving Confederate flags.... Lincoln would be ashamed of what the GOP has turned into.

11

CraWLee t1_j2ugdzi wrote

Fun fact, republican and democratic parties flip flop all the time, they've done so over 5 or 6 times since the inception of USA. In case you don't know what I'm talking about... Republicans use to be far left and democrats were far right, over and over again over the last couple centuries+...

4

Annahsbananas t1_j2u9y9e wrote

Your US history is appalling. What happens next? Looks at southern states

2

ryeley323 t1_j2ua2j5 wrote

How so? Enlighten me.

0

Annahsbananas t1_j2uawmz wrote

Google, schools, and the Public Library. Those are the first places anyone should start.

Get off your ass and learn something

3

ThrowawayPhucough t1_j2t2ugo wrote

β€˜Now, state House Republicans are trying to delay the special elections, vote themselves into leadership positions, and delay the transfer of power as long as they can. Why?’

Short answer: Because that’s what they do.

Does no one understand how hard it is to line your pockets if you have to focus on other people? /s

161

boundfortrees OP t1_j2sxc2j wrote

You can reach out to Minority Leader Bryan Cutler here: repcutler.com/contact

Tell him he must respect the will of Pennsylvania voters!

68

MegaGrubby t1_j2to33v wrote

> repcutler.com/contact

here for those who don't want to copy and paste

23

BeatsMeByDre t1_j2usk8f wrote

I just did it but seriously does sending an email ever do anything?

2

MegaGrubby t1_j2uv67z wrote

so do nothing is better? So many nihilists

5

TwitterTapeParade t1_j2wat79 wrote

You are using that word wrong. nihilists are people that believe in no moral truths and that defines those of no faith. Those who believe in evolution, natural selection, and that children should be taught to think they can be any gender they want with puberty blockers and life destroying surgeries. That is the new Democrat party.

−9

MegaGrubby t1_j2xmun2 wrote

How aren't these hate posts moderated? Six hours and still up.

edit: what's up /r/Pennsylvania ?

2

TwitterTapeParade t1_j2yw48d wrote

Maybe you are the hater? If you have the right to target people's comments then get over it snowflake.

0

pocketbookashtray t1_j2x7y1m wrote

You do realize that the Democrats do not currently hold the most seats. Way to ignore the facts. But hey, I’m guessing you’re a liberal so that goes without saying.

−6

artificialavocado t1_j2sxbx6 wrote

Republicans have always hated democracy and hate America.

53

Prestigious-Buy1774 t1_j2wxq8z wrote

That is why President Lincoln, who was a Republican, freed the slaves. I guess because he hated America and hated democracy. Check out the facts...

−7

artificialavocado t1_j2x01un wrote

Dude this is the stupidest talking point. Starting in the early 20th century, there was a complete party re-alignment. In Lincoln’s time, the Republican Party was the β€œleft” party and the Democrats were the β€œright” party. Literally anyone who’s β€œchecked the facts” should know this. It’s not even controversial.

7

baldude69 t1_j2xe2fy wrote

Are you aware the parties were essentially reversed 150 years ago? I think you are the one who needs to β€œcheck the facts”

5

Alternative-Flan2869 t1_j2tcvoj wrote

Cheaters gonna cheat. The gqp is a cult of backhanded schemers who do not give a shit about the voting citizens who need effective government.

45

pocketbookashtray t1_j2xbf7b wrote

Democrats β€œthese elections haven’t happened yet, but we’re sure we’ll win them”.

−1

Alternative-Flan2869 t1_j2xotb6 wrote

Republicans: β€œLet’s put off the elections and try to quickly pass some stuff nobody but us wants, before Democrats win again.”

3

woodcuttersDaughter t1_j2tef2q wrote

It never occurs to them that they could have power if they supported policies that supported and were popular among their constituents. No, they insist on being anti-democratic, fascist nut jobs.

42

internetcommunist t1_j2tomdz wrote

The Republican Party needs to be destroyed completely

30

cruelhumor t1_j2tu0rz wrote

Well they are doing a fine job of eating themselves alive right now, so that's nice

15

PatientNice t1_j2tj2hg wrote

This will be resolved eventually. We need to vote more Democrats in so there can never be a stupid ploy like this.

19

Aes_Should_Die t1_j2u39ua wrote

Except that it shouldn’t be that for a party to take power they blow out the other party. For the losing power to have power they just need to get close. It’s disgusting.

10

Aes_Should_Die t1_j2u3d9t wrote

It’s how 2/3 GOP presidential terms have been won this century

0

PatientNice t1_j2u9tvl wrote

You are absolutely correct. I just want these do nothing Republicans thrown out.

0

googlebearbanana t1_j2tymmt wrote

Can I just say that I hate them all. Vile people.

14

IrrumaboMalum t1_j2uuq08 wrote

This is exactly why we need to change the rules to state that a person cannot run for two offices at the same time. If you are a State Representative and you want to run for Congress, then you run for Congress. That way another person can run for your now-vacant State Representative position and we won't see situations like this happen again.

Are the Republicans playing dirty? Yes.

But ultimately this is the fault of Summer Lee for running for PA House and the House of Representatives in the same election. She created the situation herself. If Summer Lee and Austin Davis had only run for higher office (Congress and Lt. Gov) and allowed others to run for their state-level offices, Democrats would control the State House and this wouldn't be an issue.

4

themollusk t1_j2xik9u wrote

I already contacted my freshman rep (Republican) to push this same thing... Fix PA election law to disallow running for multiple seats in the same cycle.

Maybe since the Rs are getting more burnt than the Ds with this, they'll actually try to make headway on it? 🀞

1

IrrumaboMalum t1_j2zrc6a wrote

Even if the Republicans support it, I don't see it passing the Democrat-controlled State House despite the fact that it almost cost them the Speaker position.

1

colnelburton t1_j2ulimz wrote

A quick lookup (article VI, Sectional 628) has me thinking that the next set of elections (primary, municipal, or general) will have to include the special elections, right? But that assumes that the presiding officer of the legislative branch filed the appropriate writs. Do we know if that happened? Last, and not least, there's a clause that says under certain conditions the presiding officer can just choose to not hold the special election if they deem it not in the public interest. Is that what's at stake here - republicans claiming legislation leadership and just cancelling the special elections entirely?

2

Prestigious-Buy1774 t1_j2wzn08 wrote

Pretty much has all the facts right.... But what exactly is wrong with letting the voters decide on amendments?? It's not the will of the General Assembly then, It is the will of the majority of voters in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania

0

themollusk t1_j2y28rd wrote

>But what exactly is wrong with letting the voters decide on amendments??

In theory and on paper? Nothing.

The issue is with how it's implemented and the threshold for passing. The US Constitution takes 2/3 of the House and Senate, and then 3/4 of the states to agree to it before an amendment goes through. In PA all it takes is 50% + 1 at every step of the process. The state GOP had been abusing the process in order to pass unpopular legislation that they wouldn't be able to muster enough votes to override a D governor's veto. For something as serious as amending the construction, a larger consensus should be made, not a skin of the teeth majority.

2

CraWLee t1_j2ufhur wrote

Shocker. Common wealth means nothing anymore unless it benefits the elites.

1

pocketbookashtray t1_j2x7r1t wrote

Hilarious headline. The real headline should be β€œcrybaby Democrats again want to change the rules when they don’t win”.

1

Deerbooty t1_j2xffvw wrote

So no weed legalization? Lol

1

pocketbookashtray t1_j2xbd95 wrote

Democrats β€œthese elections haven’t happened yet, but we’re sure we’ll win them”.

0

buglossbugwon t1_j2vc0r1 wrote

The House Republicans did win the statewide popular vote, though

−3

hvacthrowaway223 t1_j2th89l wrote

Last I looked at this, though, they are just following the rules. There are no β€œparties” recognized, it’s just who gets the most votes. If the republicans can get enough votes, then they get their person in. Until the full chamber is seated and then it goes back again. There is no β€œwill of the voters”, just votes.

−24

tyrael459 t1_j2tisdo wrote

Fine, but why delay the special elections?

24

tehroz t1_j2tlftr wrote

I love that ya'll think there's a difference between Democrats and Republicans.

−36

Annahsbananas t1_j2uaetj wrote

Oh Jesus Christ. Not another aLl PaRtiES Are The SaME

6

tehroz t1_j2ublsl wrote

Educate me, then. Or does randomly using the shift key constitute the full spectrum of your cognitive ability?

−3

Josh4R3d t1_j2vbbpk wrote

Wow you’re such an intellectual and so enlightened

2

tehroz t1_j2vc50m wrote

I’d be more than happy to discuss further, without snark or sarcasm, if that’s possible.

While the parties differ, the people do not. They’re all power hungry, greedy, and self centered.

Prove me wrong.

2

rjb5065 t1_j2trc7u wrote

You mean like Tom Wolfe did during covid?

−37

Donotaskmedontellme t1_j2t1950 wrote

I mean, they're appealing to THEIR voters. That's what politicians do.

−58

AgentDaxis t1_j2t5chi wrote

THEIR voters represent a dwindling minority in PA.

30

Donotaskmedontellme t1_j2t5nul wrote

Minorities still have rights you know

−33

spartacuscollective t1_j2ta562 wrote

You might as well argue that apartheid in South Africa was about "minority rights" since whites technically were in the minority. Absolutely ridiculous.

25

susinpgh t1_j2t72xj wrote

In what possible way has it become de rigueur to refer to the Republican party as a minority?

22

MomsSpecialFriend t1_j2thrfk wrote

Only 10% of Pennsylvanians support their anti abortion policy, they are pandering to only a fringe group.

26

Donotaskmedontellme t1_j2ti6c2 wrote

I am also pro-choice. I'm primarily pro-2A, however.

−16

eMPereb t1_j2ttqao wrote

There are a bunch of other amendments too, just saying…

11

Donotaskmedontellme t1_j2tu0r6 wrote

Correct. The 2nd helps protect them.

−18

sprcpr t1_j2tv1yo wrote

This is always a hilarious response. As though uncle Jumbo with his AR is going to protect 'merica.

17

Donotaskmedontellme t1_j2tv7h2 wrote

Threats from within, really. A rifle was more than a match for JFK, and he was loved. Imagine how poorly it would go for a truly hated politician.

−3

PencilTucky t1_j2u2lmt wrote

More than a match? He was shot in the back of the head for fucks sake. Was he going to good-guy-with-a-gun out of that one? What a terrible argument.

7

Donotaskmedontellme t1_j2u2rgg wrote

I'm saying politicians are far more vulnerable than their military, and to take down a tyrannical government you AVOID having shootouts with soldiers.

1

eMPereb t1_j2uxeio wrote

Yes and again there are others not just #2

1

[deleted] t1_j2t2ivz wrote

[deleted]

0

Donotaskmedontellme t1_j2t2scj wrote

Lol. Lmao, even. Democrats promising to turn me into a felon overnight and the Supreme Court being the only thing stopping them, does NOT in any way constitute "representation"

−7

hemiones t1_j2t8xss wrote

What are you talking about man?

12

Donotaskmedontellme t1_j2t9pki wrote

I would vote for Democrats if they stopped supporting gun control and AWBs is all. Plus the excessive taxes are pretty awful, and they could be tougher on crime. I really don't like voting Republican but I ain't pinning my mags to 10 rounds.

0

hemiones t1_j2tcalu wrote

I ask this is all seriousness, what scenario do you see yourself needing such a powerful gun? Why is military grade required in your everyday.

12

Donotaskmedontellme t1_j2tcnih wrote

You do realize almost every 9mm handgun holds more than 10 rounds right? Mine is a compact and it shipped with 13 round mags, but the 15s are the same size.

As for my AR15, it's just about bare minimum for home defense. A rifle is always better for aiming, and shotguns are awful for multiple intruder scenarios

1

Lunamothknits t1_j2thu8o wrote

An AR is a horrible choice for close quarters. What an absolute fud. 🀑

Instead of crying about mag load limits, maybe go to the range and git good.

9

M2hBDf1Nhw1VB7 t1_j2u7rqf wrote

It’s the most popular home defense gun. Break ins occur with groups of intruders these days. A rifle evens those odds. There are more AR-15s than F-150s in America. The F-150 is the most popular selling vehicle in this country and must be registered. An AR-15 in most states doesn’t need registration so there are even more than we know about.

I keep an AR-15 in a safe in my bedroom. Considering a break in occurs while sleeping, being tired vs wide awake attackers, the 30 round standard magazine and the low recoil of the smaller 5.56 round leaving a 16” barrel means I have the advantage. Why do I need this over other options? It’s my fucking home. If someone comes here to do harm to me or my family, I want every advantage over them. I don’t want a fair fight. I want to win. (Obviously I’d prefer no fight and no break in)

−1

Lunamothknits t1_j2v2vlr wrote

Y’all are exactly why reform needs to happen. I would bet my entire house on you never training with that weapon for close quarters. Because you’d know better. But be a fud, I’m sure it’ll go just fine.

0

Nipplehau t1_j2tlcr5 wrote

I'm generally I'm favor of some forms of firearm regulation.

People on the left need to stop calling standard ARs powerful guns. They're easy and comfortable to shoot. They're highly customizable. They are the same form factor and fire the same rounds as a standard military select fire weapon. But they're not 'powerful' guns relative to most of the things an average gun owner may own. The round a standard AR shoots is just barely legal for deer hunting in most states based on size.

The bullet a standard AR shoots carries almost half the energy that a normal hunting round carries.

Edit: And to actually answer your question about in what scenario I felt like I wanted one, I bought one specifically for pig hunting in the southern US. It's simply one of the best options for that. I haven't had one charge me yet, but I don't want to be fumbling with a bolt or a more cumbersome gun if one ever does. There are a lot of other very similar options that most people wouldn't associate with the military that I could have gotten, but the AR is widely available and can be relatively inexpensive.

0

yeags86 t1_j2uo6gv wrote

If you need more than 10 rounds, your aim must be pretty fucking atrocious.

3

Donotaskmedontellme t1_j2vyycy wrote

I have seen several videos, and heard of even more instances, of people being shot more than 10 times and still living long enough to stab the person shooting them.

1

I_am_Daesomst t1_j2whvok wrote

Were those videos a part of the movie T2: Judgment Day?

2

Donotaskmedontellme t1_j2whxvl wrote

Just your average crackheads

1

I_am_Daesomst t1_j2wi9p6 wrote

There isn't a crackhead in this state that's going to handle 5 rounds from the Judge.

2

Donotaskmedontellme t1_j2wiign wrote

Maybe if you're running the .45 longcolts, but even then there was an instance where the bathsalts face eater dude took like 30+ rounds, from .45 acp and .357 magnum before dropping.

1

I_am_Daesomst t1_j2wkjoy wrote

Do you have a source? The guy that was eating a homeless guy's face in Florida 10 years ago was brought down by 4 shots, but you may be referring to a different attack.

Either way, I'm less than concerned about it. I'm a Capricorn, but I have faith in Taurus.

2

RipTide275 t1_j2tx70z wrote

What do you think happens to your civil liberties and taxes if you let them take your guns. 2A

1

ArchaeoJones t1_j2t9ytx wrote

Oh quit lying. You already sound enough like a tinfoil hat nutjob.

9

Donotaskmedontellme t1_j2ta7jd wrote

I ain't pinning my mags to 10 rounds, don't give a shit what laws they want to pass.

2

ArchaeoJones t1_j2tahsm wrote

Cry harder dude.

It's not our fault you chose to be ammosexual.

10

Donotaskmedontellme t1_j2tbbq6 wrote

Ain't my choice either. I didn't choose to be bisexual either but here we are.

0

ArchaeoJones t1_j2td0gs wrote

... wow dude. Comparing biology to having a shit mentality. Way to go.

9

Donotaskmedontellme t1_j2tdlgg wrote

I did not choose to understand what is necessary to defend oneself against any and all threats, nor the necessity to preserve the rights of the individual, just as I did not choose to be attracted to males, females, and everyone inbetween.

1