Yak_Rodeo

Yak_Rodeo t1_jeaynd0 wrote

Reply to comment by KrockKalseeen in Moving advice by KrockKalseeen

yes i understand youre looking to rent

most of the apartments you found “fitting the criteria” are either scams or landlord specials

it can take upwards of 40 minutes to go 3 stops on public transit nowadays

youre not finding good apartments in the city or close to it for under 2k

21

Yak_Rodeo t1_jdpmur1 wrote

paying to move up here and go to fisher, emmanuel, or lesley is an incredibly massive waste of money

no disrespect to those schools but they simply are not worth moving for

67

Yak_Rodeo t1_j2cpv89 wrote

because city land is far smaller than most other cities in the country, we are like the 8th biggest metro

i never said that i am against building housing, just that a blanket “build” policy is not conducive to building neighborhoods and communities. the seaport is a perfect example of building soulless neighborhoods

take care of boston residents before enticing more and more biotech and life science startups here

−16

Yak_Rodeo t1_j2bazf8 wrote

its an understandable argument

most people on here didnt grow up here and dont have the same reference for their neighborhood as maybe you and i did, they just want their rent to go down, which is fair

i just dislike the notion around here sometimes that we need to become this super high density city for…some reason

−30

Yak_Rodeo t1_j2b3c8y wrote

at the risk of being exiled from this group i am probably a little bit more “nimby” than most on this page, in the sense that i dont think we need to scramble to turn boston into a metropolis like new york but…this is a little ridiculous

shawmut is one of the least used stations and there really is no reason an auto body shops needs to be on a parcel literally next to t property

as for neighborhood character, theres a pretty large apartment building right on the corner of melbourne st and plenty along washington st/talbot, why are those fine but not this?

its too bad we couldnt reroute the tracks and place a station right in codman instead of nestled between million dollar homes on melville and ashmont hill

51

Yak_Rodeo t1_j2528ht wrote

Reply to Boston 311 by Equal-Love

did they say why? they probably forwarded it to the trash contractor, the city doesnt pick up your trash

2

Yak_Rodeo t1_j24sl6s wrote

if you only want a car to see friends i would say no, if you need it as a backup to make sure you get to work on time when the t inevitably fails you then yes

2

Yak_Rodeo t1_j20f18c wrote

i agree, but thats more of an issue with the city itself. i think the city could do some unique things to remedy it like significant homebuyer rebates for city workers who sign an agreement to stay for a period of time or some variation of that

we are kind of at a perfect storm with the city becoming prohibitively expensive for middle class workers while also national opinion is steering potentially good candidates away from police as a career. the days of the civil service exams having lines out the door for the cop test are long gone

1

Yak_Rodeo t1_j20eepv wrote

i think policing is a different beast from teaching or being a 911 dispatcher and officers are expected to be nearby to be able to respond to a major event

i agree with you that they are limiting the talent pool, and i think a provision could be reached to allow people who take the position time to move into the city

i would like my police force to be able to vote in local elections, know and shop at the local businesses and interact with members of the community they police outside of negative or enforcement oriented meetings.

14