I want it even though it is not useful to me

Sadly it apparently Is

There is no way that it is more likely that this waa intentional and not a crazy mistake. Leak the information in a less public way and have the cops either moved, fired, or killed, and then it probably wouldn't even make the news.

These pigeons have no chill

So who gets civil rights?

Isn't an ethnostate just naturally controversial to anyone who lives in a real (Or faux) Western democracy?

I would be scared for my life if my experience was that they probably won't murder me for saying things they don't like.

Oh, that makes much more sense. This article just saying ahe turned up again makes it totally unclear if she understood why she couldn't go there again. Although obviously it doesn't say anything about how competent she is, but it makes it entirely rational for them to assume that this is someone who may intend to hurt people.

She fell asleep because she was drunk the first time, and the article doesn't make it clear if she realized that people would find it threatening when she came back. Presumably the competency check is for the court to determine how likely it is that she didn't understand that this would violate her bail (and that it was definitely antagonistic) or if she really isn't competent enough to be fully blamed for her bad acts. (Racists who are sick deserve medical treatment too)

Poor woman, she probably does need that competency evaluation if she was dumb enough to not realize that people are going to think you might hurt someone if you show up again after the initial vandalism. There is clearly something wrong with her if she did not realize that the initial charge was not the only thing that would happen if she continued to seem like a serious possible threat to these people.

Also most vandals don't fall asleep at the scene of the crime because they are drunk, so I would assume the people at the synagogue would want her to get help if that is what she needs. (Not to say there aren't a bunch of bigots who are fully responsible for their own behavior, but this looks like she is probably a bigot and also very possibly unwell)

Do they see no value in liberal democracy, or is it just that immediate needs like power and heat naturally override most people's desire for a better government ? Because obviously the average person isn't going to choose freezing or starving if they see no path to a better government, even if "radicals" would take the chance and continue to oppose a bad government with the belief that a good government can be created.

Oh, I didn't realize you were some nut who thinks protesters should be harmed.

Why would we let some shady company ignore his contract just because the amount of money is silly? I don't think we can really claim that he took advantage of them, if the agreement added up to many millions and they never paid it then they still owe it to him. Just like a company could owe me 1k or 10k or a million.

Oh, this is a great one, although if you trust Rockstar almost any IP could make a good open world game. (Though I guess you'd have to make tagging or something a bigger mechanic to add some variety)

Depends if you have some people taking care of your house and family and a phone and charger to check on them, being trapped somewhere in a bad storm, even if you trust the building, would still leave you very worried about the stuff you are supposed to be watching out for. The outdoor conditions have to be pretty terrible to get trapped like that. (I.e. a step or two beyond "very icy" or "poor visibility")

Sorry, I wasn't informed and went off what CNN said. Who in Netanyahu's new cabinet is not male?

The idea of an ethnic state was already kinda tenuous, Netanyahu heading an insane right wing all male government seems entirely stupid. Netanyahu cares more about Netanyahu than he cares about Israel. What a joke.

This is weird enough that it sounds like some sort of psychological problem, I don't think the woman would have realized that she didn't want to be a mother. Abortion should've legal, of course, but this case is probably unrelated.

John King, Steve King is a crazy Republican politician

Licht worked with Colbert, it just seems like the only thing that matters here is money and the money and/or will to make CNN better is not there. So the plan seems to be to make CNN even worse and cheaper and hope that they can position themselves between MSNBC and Fox News, when that's obviously crazy for multiple reasons. (People who presently believe CNN is controlled by Satanists for being mean to Trump are not going to come to their senses)

Some of the characters are jerks and the show never explicitly disagrees with them. Not even just Beth or her husband, Costner's character is also a piece of shit. All the characters are rich people who know they know better than the government and everyone outside of their insular community.

I don't even want to commit crimes and it still seems like the prudent thing to do would be to always insist I'm running for president and therefore all investigations are crooked.

That makes a lot more sense in a world where he's virtually never "one of you," so he's always sort of an outsider even if he's super useful and fairly kind. All in English and from a modern perspective it's a bit more silly, since why would you not want to keep this guy as an ally? He's a main character!

Back then they had to ride bison

I came to the thread to ask if 1883 was good, but instead I'm going to say yes.

And with a Costner lookalike replicant it'd be a hit.

The Google Pixel C was a great tablet that they quickly abandoned and left with a bug where you can't even use a screen lock password since it'll accidentally lose the password and force you to wipe your device.