Your level is either trolling or blindingly delusional.

I responded with childish insults because frankly you have not shown either the intelligence or emotional maturity to respond to anything else.

The rest of your comment proves my point that you either willfully ignore facts or don't understand why you're wrong and are incapable of learning. So I hope you have a nice life, but I'm not here to teach you the things your middle school teachers failed to teach you, so this conversation is over.

aLl tHe EsTaBLisHeD pLAyeRs dO iT

If you're too stupid to understand that the only meaningful (I won't use the word objective because you clearly don't understand it) way to compare reliability is to compare rates, rather than "x company had issues with component y" or that finding examples of similar failure modes without numbers on frequency is textbook whataboutism, engaging with you isn't worth it because you won't learn and trying to explain it in ways you would understand would only make me sink to your level

Are you going for "idiotic Internet argument bingo?"

Whataboutism and false equivalency both in a 5 word comment must be a new record.

Fact of the matter is that teslas have shit reliability and anyone with five seconds to spare can figure that out just like I did.

First they turned the frogs gay and now the gay frogs are taking our jehrbs

Send them across the pond! They're well qualified applicants for American cops

It's especially stupid since I'd expect a lot of their revenue is from a large volume of contracts so they should have fairly stable ARR

That's.... Not how airlines work.

Everyone except Russia has very strict maintenance standards that are actually upheld. That's why you get ridiculous shit like "my flight got delayed because someone's tray table wouldn't lock"

Two things can both be bad

Actually it's not as bad as you'd think... Turbulence in a situation like that a trivial factor, the tendency is to either stay in the flow (where your relative velocity is low) or get kicked out of it. Unless you're trying you're pretty much guaranteed not to stay at the interface of the prop wash.

And aeration from a point source like that is very much a function of water velocity, and the air bubbles tend to rise pretty quickly. So if you look behind a motor boat you might see a long trail of bubbles but the length is mostly because they get pushed far out, not that they take a long time to rise

With a pfd, if you had the foresight to hold your breath, I'd say it's pretty much a guarantee that you'd survive. So in context is just a question of whether they got caught off guard and got unlucky with their breath, or of they got disoriented.

You can absolutely create a malicious microcontroller that does some malicious days transfer on the side, you have no idea what you're talking about

I can see your security engineers are working overtime covering for you.

There's tons of purpose built IC's without any code to review

You don't understand this is deep state propaganda of course it runs deep /s

No one asked him to fund it. Various governments are already funding a lot of it, and according to some sources SpaceX is war profiteering hardcore with the prices they're charging the governments/NGO's

Yes but Ukraine never asked for anything advanced, and there's little to no evidence of anything but the basic dishes in Ukraine

Curious, cartels typically like round numbers like 25 or 50...

That's the whole point. Late wildfire season, with lots of fires smoldering in inaccessible areas, turned a normally high air quality place into the worst.

The wildfire season wasn't even bad, in terms of acres burned, but anecdotally I think the smoke was still pretty bad. Not the worst ever for sure, but not the best either (I think)

Probably still better than the planes military folks jump out of