charliespider
charliespider t1_j6lzn0y wrote
Reply to PS2 Launch Day. by theonlyzeeshan
This might be a repost
charliespider t1_j3pwifb wrote
This made my day. Thanks for being such an awesome person. Great job too.
charliespider t1_j25ta0l wrote
Reply to comment by Marijn_fly in If the Big Bang was the end of a previous universe, then could a strong enough telescope see into the previous universe? by [deleted]
Some also suspect there are neutrinos still ripping about from the big bang, but we won't be able to intelligently detect and interpret those any time soon.
charliespider t1_j25sisz wrote
Reply to comment by Opus-the-Penguin in If the Big Bang was the end of a previous universe, then could a strong enough telescope see into the previous universe? by [deleted]
Nope.
Here's a thought experiment that might help explain the issue:
Imagine if you can, an infinite universe that is ALSO infinitely dense. So all of the energy in this universe is crushed down into an infinitely dense point, but this point is also infinite in length in every direction.
Now imagine that ALL of that energy suddenly expands outwards in all directions across all of infinity, becoming significantly less dense in an instant. As the energy decreases in density and temperature it begins to condense into matter. But again, this happens everywhere at the same time across this entire infinite universe. We just happen to be somewhere within all of that.
We don't know if that's what has actually happened but it's one possibility and hopefully gives you an idea of how we can't identify a center or starting point for the big bang. As far as we can tell, the big bang happened everywhere.
charliespider t1_iztltv3 wrote
charliespider t1_izov8b3 wrote
Reply to comment by five707 in An analysis of 4511 vaccine-related tweets show that anti-vaccine messaging tends to focus on the "harmful" nature of vaccines, based on personal values and beliefs rather than hard facts. Anonymity did not affect the type of content posted, but did affect volume of content. by glawgii
Tell me you don't know the meaning of "anecdotal" without telling me you don't know the meaning of "anecdotal"
(EDIT)
LOLZ!
I interpreted the comment I responded to as meaning the study was anecdotal, but I see now that they meant the anti-vaxxers' tweets were anecdotal.
I had contemplated adding another line to my comment like:
>a scientific study is the exact opposite of anecdotal
but didn't because my response seemed sufficient as is. OOPS!
Now people think I'M the anti-vaxxer!
charliespider t1_iya7srv wrote
Reply to Between the boiling hot day side of the moon (250F/120C) and the chilly night side (-208F/-130C), there must be a sweet spot on the moon at which you wouldn’t need to wear any astronaut suit for temperature reasons by Jaded_genie
Nope. There's no atmosphere to buffer temperatures and transfer excess heat to colder areas. You are either in the direct path of the super intense electromagnetic radiation streaming from the sun, or you are standing in a cold vacuum.
charliespider t1_iy7b4sz wrote
Reply to "Why does electrolux have a sideways butt wearing a thong as their logo?" :D by Folksvaletti
Or it's a Mandalorian helmet on its side
charliespider t1_iy4ambk wrote
Reply to comment by doterobcn in Dominican sugar imports tied to forced labor rejected by US by tnick771
IKR! Had to read the title a couple of times to make sure I was interpreting it right
charliespider t1_iy201xb wrote
If anyone has watched any of the early seasons of that tv show Alone (currently on prime video) Josef Bay is about 30km north of the general area that show was filmed.
charliespider t1_ixy0abv wrote
Reply to Norma Jean Banana, Me, Banana, 2019 by fairEuropean448
Picks up banana... bites off Marilyn Monroe's feet
charliespider t1_ixbrxts wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in TIL a physicist once tried to falsify creation of two new elements by silask93
But it's also peer reviewed and if results are not reproducible then those results are ultimately discarded, especially when better science comes along.
charliespider t1_iue17xv wrote
Reply to comment by OSFrog2023 in The scariest picture of space... by EDFLsnape
Wow... ok... I link to a couple of articles (could have linked more) where physicists discuss the possibility that the thing we call the "laws of physics" may not be as immutable as once thought and you respond with:
>the laws of physics are absolute to our entire observable universe thus far
You realize that we don't even know what 95%+ of the universe even is right? These "laws of physics" you are so certain about only explain 4-5% of the matter/energy we are aware of.
I think I'll take the opinion of a well known physicist like Sean Carroll over some guy on Reddit.
charliespider t1_iucekye wrote
Reply to comment by OSFrog2023 in The scariest picture of space... by EDFLsnape
Right, what he implied wouldn't happen but I was referring to things like this: https://www.science.org/content/article/are-laws-physics-changing
https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/article/are-the-laws-of-physics-really-universal/
and not just the consolidation of the fundamental forces.
charliespider t1_iucd9pf wrote
Reply to comment by EDFLsnape in The scariest picture of space... by EDFLsnape
Exact opposite. We are absolute miracles. We are so lucky to have the awareness to experience this. Too many people are buried under their ego's self obsession and miss out on that fact.
charliespider t1_iuccysq wrote
Reply to comment by OSFrog2023 in The scariest picture of space... by EDFLsnape
As far as we can determine yes, but we are not positive. There have been speculations that some of the "constants" have even changed over time since the big bang, which could have ramifications with regards to inflation, etc
charliespider t1_itp0cr8 wrote
Reply to comment by No_Match1529 in Russia accused of sabotaging city's water supply by supppbrahhh
ya... apparently to drown the children!
charliespider t1_is665e3 wrote
Love it! Favourite painting of yours I've seen.
charliespider t1_j8sr7pi wrote
Reply to comment by ChrisARippel in Hypothetically Can us humans build an artificial planet? by prof_chaos7
Assuming this new planet was intended for human use, best place would be same orbit as Earth but on the other side of the sun.