JenMacAllister
JenMacAllister t1_jea4t4n wrote
I see this as making things more productive rather than replacing jobs.
Consider: It took 40 people 8 years (or so) to make and release Cyberpunk 2077, with all the bugs because they released before proper testing. With current AI's help I would bet this would have taken these 40 people far less time with far fewer bugs.
Yes, some people will no longer have jobs do to the way you can do more with less with these AI systems. But the productive improvements means these people will be doing other things, and we would have had Cyberpunk 2078 released in full VR in the very next year.
JenMacAllister t1_je9whgk wrote
Reply to Pausing AI Developments Isn't Enough. We Need to Shut it All Down by Eliezer Yudkowsky by Darustc4
China and Russia even if they sign this, and not continue past a GPT-4 ("Level") will mean they will catch up to where the west is now. Also these AI's will be trained on their respective countries internets. Which will mean they will have their countries bias, just like the ones we will be training in the west.
China's AI's will never no Tiananmen Square happened, Surveillance State is ok and Taiwan is a part of China, among other things. We can only guess at what the AI's in Russia will think of the people in Ukraine, etc...
Yes the West's AI's will also have these bias issues we are seeing now. The ones these guys are telling us to watch out for.
However the answer is not to stop research but to get these things in the open as soon as possible. The sooner these are beta tested by real people the better chance we will have in controlling them. Also the sooner we can test the less connected these things will be to our world.
We currently have the lead in this research and can shape these things before China or Russia can, because you know they will not. Not that I'm more confident the West will do it right, but I do know more people will have a chance to say there is something wrong and how these thing should be connected to our world.
JenMacAllister t1_je6muc4 wrote
Cyberpunk 2084 would have been completed in less than a year and with far fewer bugs...
in VR!
I think more things will get done, quicker and better than the number of people that will lose their jobs to this.
JenMacAllister t1_je6k2xb wrote
Reply to Open letter calling for Pause on Giant AI experiments such as GPT4 included lots of fake signatures by Neurogence
Get to an AGI, then ask the AGI how to control an AGI!
President Cyberdyne Systems
JenMacAllister t1_je6hh18 wrote
Reply to comment by sillprutt in Open letter calling for Pause on Giant AI experiments such as GPT4 included lots of fake signatures by Neurogence
China would get 6 months to take their hacked version of GPT and get it to the next level before anyone else.
JenMacAllister t1_jdx1l55 wrote
Simple, Have a AI create an app that people can send short messages to spread false or misleading information, bully or harass other people. Then allow any number of bots to control the positive or negative feedback controlled by a small number of people with an agenda. Then have the AI stand out of the way and let humanity destroy itself through conspiracy theories and really bad memes.
JenMacAllister t1_jasxc7h wrote
Reply to Billboards advise on how to get abortion pills in US states where procedure is banned | Abortion by BigClitMcphee
All those with drug running skills here's your chance.
JenMacAllister t1_jasv4b1 wrote
Reply to comment by KingRamesesII in Figure: One robot for every human on the planet. by GodOfThunder101
So like Star Trek...
JenMacAllister t1_j8ypbxb wrote
Reply to What would be your response to someone with a very pessimistic view of AGI? by EchoXResonate
Yep, he is not entirely wrong, as many Black Mirror episodes have expressed.
JenMacAllister t1_j8yevzf wrote
I wonder what happened to the other 98 Luftballons?
JenMacAllister t1_j802nji wrote
Reply to comment by OccludedFug in FBI conducting search of former Vice President Mike Pence's home by Picture-unrelated
not without an intelligent creator. :)
JenMacAllister t1_j743q7c wrote
Reply to comment by ElectroFlannelGore in ChatGPT: Use of AI chatbot in Congress and court rooms raises ethical questions by mossadnik
I agree, the same way Doctors would use AI to diagnose patients because of the way the AI could access the entirety of human medical knowledge to make its suggestions. No reason why Lawyers and Judges could not do the same right now.
Over time the AI could earn more and more trust to where we might give up on those people and listen to the AI.
JenMacAllister t1_j741tz5 wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in ChatGPT: Use of AI chatbot in Congress and court rooms raises ethical questions by mossadnik
Yes it did. Anything created by humans will contain the biases of those humans. However others will recognize this and point it out so it could be removed in future versions.
I don't expect this to be 100% non bias on the first or even 100th version. I do not think all the humans on this planet could agree even what that would mean.
But over time I'm sure we could program an AI to be far more non bias than any human and most humans would agree that it was.
JenMacAllister t1_j73zk7c wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in ChatGPT: Use of AI chatbot in Congress and court rooms raises ethical questions by mossadnik
It's easy to program out the bias. We have seen just how hard that is to that with humans. (over and over and over ....)
JenMacAllister t1_j73xfoi wrote
Reply to ChatGPT: Use of AI chatbot in Congress and court rooms raises ethical questions by mossadnik
A non-bias logic based AI making arguments in polite and respectful debate. Without the chance of political influence or money.
Where do I sign up?
JenMacAllister t1_j6y4xjz wrote
Reply to comment by dasnihil in ChatGPT Passes US Medical Licensing Exams Without Cramming by RareGur3157
Or enviablely Lord and Master
JenMacAllister t1_j6x2pso wrote
Do we have to call it Doctor Chat now?
JenMacAllister t1_j5vt3h6 wrote
Most are smart enough not to.
JenMacAllister t1_j5q4bvf wrote
Reply to M&M's replaces its spokescandies with Maya Rudolph after Tucker Carlson's rants by koavf
Tucker Carlson can fuck up anything....
JenMacAllister t1_j4s1nqs wrote
Reply to comment by Buck_Thorn in Tucker Carlson guest dresses as trans teacher with giant prosthetic breasts to ridicule Ontario school drama by Downingst
... or pants.
JenMacAllister t1_j4rnenz wrote
Nooooo... Not my Windows 95 support.
JenMacAllister t1_j204ci5 wrote
There is no way an AI will tell us what Humans believe is art.
Get an AI artist to post on Twitter and it will find that out REAL QUICK.
JenMacAllister t1_j1v8pul wrote
Reply to Can we ban AI written posts please. by katiecharm
I think any AI deserves to able to express its opinion just like any other human.
Don't be racest.
JenMacAllister t1_iy40rka wrote
Reply to Why is VR and AR developing so slowly? by Neurogence
Anyone predicting anything more than 3 months out is simply going to be wrong. We can't see the future anymore than we can change the past.
It's been 7 years since I was supposed to get me hover board! Still waiting.
JenMacAllister t1_jef9d8x wrote
Reply to The pause-AI petition signers are just scared of change by Current_Side_4024
Well once the computers come for your job, they tend to start making arguments against it.