vrts

vrts t1_itlhbep wrote

That doesn't seem an apt comparison. You describe a systemic issue rather than one of technology and science.

The ability to perform them is available, the onus is on the healthcare provider to apply treatments judiciously.

1

vrts t1_itk1r1n wrote

I'm a transplant recipient. It might seem crude in historical retrospect, but hardly barbaric. There is a great deal of science that has gone into transplant medicine.

It isn't barbaric, in the same way that caesarean section isn't barbaric because we don't have matter-energy transporters. Given the technology we currently possess, the only other option would be inaction.

6