philmarcracken
philmarcracken t1_j716k5x wrote
Reply to comment by UUDDLRLRBAstard in Incredible footage of this Tsunami is mind blowing by HurricaneHarvey7
なんでやねん
philmarcracken t1_j6evqxb wrote
Reply to Eli5: Why is the screen ratio 16:9 so common instead of something like 2:1 or even just 1:1? by sansgamer554
16:9 is a compromise aspect ratio between older movies that were 4:3(going all the way back to black and white film) and 'modern' widescreen formats that sit around 21:9. Thats why you see the black bars at the top at bottom on 16:9 screens displaying 21:9 content.
I say 'modern' widescreen formats like 21:9 because the aspect ratio wars kicked off in the 1950's with Cinerama, which was three 35mm cameras taped together and required the same 3 projectors in the movie theater to work. Ridiculous complexity and cost. The war ended with some clever anamorphic lenses letting filmmakers use just the one 35mm camera(and therefore single cost of film) and using the reverse lens on the projector in the cinema.
This was all in effort to destroy peoples experience in watching movies at home on TVs(so they would buy movie tickets instead). It didn't work; people still did that, they watched 21:9 content on 4:3, which then had to be 'panned and scanned'. If you ask any director or DP about panning and scanning, you'll witness an entire horror movie play on their face. Or they'll just start swearing before you've finished saying 'scanning'.
The effect of P&S is taking a 21:9 movie like ben-hur, then having a teenager record that movie on their phone in vertical mode(9:16), trying to keep all the principal action in frame. A man named Ken Powers came along and established a compromise between 21:9 and 4:3 = 16:9. This is a now the dominate aspect outside the movie theaters, unless you buy specific ultra wide screen monitors or home projectors.
philmarcracken t1_j4cy14d wrote
philmarcracken t1_iuk5sim wrote
Reply to comment by Gonazar in General Contractor Gives Price Quote on Removing Sword from Stone by FmrEdgelord
oh shit you're right. if you use tampermonkey or greasemonkey, you can install this:
https://greasyfork.org/en/scripts/439993-youtube-shorts-redirect
And it works fine. I had totally forgotten which filter did what
philmarcracken t1_iujpeg6 wrote
Reply to comment by Gonazar in General Contractor Gives Price Quote on Removing Sword from Stone by FmrEdgelord
I posted some custom lines above for ublock origin that unfucks youtube
philmarcracken t1_iug97vm wrote
Reply to comment by Fartmatic in General Contractor Gives Price Quote on Removing Sword from Stone by FmrEdgelord
those in the know use this on ublock origin(my filters):
! remove youtube shorts and videos less than 70s long
www.youtube.com##ytd-browse ytd-grid-video-renderer:has(span.ytd-thumbnail-overlay-time-status-renderer:has-text(/\s(0:\d\d|1:0\d)\s/))
www.youtube.com##ytd-browse ytd-rich-item-renderer:has(span.ytd-thumbnail-overlay-time-status-renderer:has-text(/\s(0:\d\d|1:0\d)\s/))
www.youtube.com##ytd-search ytd-video-renderer:has(span.ytd-thumbnail-overlay-time-status-renderer:has-text(/\s(0:\d\d|1:0\d)\s/))
www.youtube.com##ytd-watch-next-secondary-results-renderer ytd-compact-video-renderer:has(span.ytd-thumbnail-overlay-time-status-renderer:has-text(/\s(0:\d\d|1:0\d)\s/))
www.youtube.com##ytd-browse ytd-grid-video-renderer:has(span.ytd-thumbnail-overlay-time-status-renderer[aria-label="Shorts"])
www.youtube.com##ytd-browse ytd-rich-item-renderer:has(span.ytd-thumbnail-overlay-time-status-renderer[aria-label="Shorts"])
www.youtube.com##ytd-search ytd-video-renderer:has(span.ytd-thumbnail-overlay-time-status-renderer[aria-label="Shorts"])
www.youtube.com##ytd-watch-next-secondary-results-renderer ytd-compact-video-renderer:has(span.ytd-thumbnail-overlay-time-status-renderer[aria-label="Shorts"])
www.youtube.com###guide-content #endpoint[title="Shorts"]:upward(ytd-guide-entry-renderer)
www.youtube.com###items #endpoint[title="Shorts"]:upward(ytd-mini-guide-entry-renderer)
www.youtube.com##ytd-browse[page-subtype="subscriptions"] ytd-video-renderer span.ytd-thumbnail-overlay-time-status-renderer[aria-label="Shorts"]:upward(ytd-item-section-renderer)
philmarcracken t1_j9q180d wrote
Reply to comment by kermitpolice in Research suggests that school-based physical activity intervention, by way of increasing physical exercise classes to daily during school, is successful in reducing childhood obesity. Scientists found that obesity was reversed after 3 years. by Wagamaga
You can't outrun a bad diet. Looking at their BMI table from control to intervention, the drop is 'there' but almost meaningless.