nutidizen
nutidizen t1_jedmdxr wrote
Reply to comment by tiselo3655necktaicom in Interesting article: AI will eventually free people up to 'work when they want to,' ChatGPT investor predicts by Coolsummerbreeze1
were working a less than we used to 40 years ago... and making a lot more money
nutidizen t1_jae82h9 wrote
Reply to comment by turnip_burrito in How can I adapt to AI replacing my career in the short term? Help needed by YaAbsolyutnoNikto
If the AI improvement doesn't halt its pace then yes.
nutidizen t1_jacenbx wrote
Reply to comment by turnip_burrito in How can I adapt to AI replacing my career in the short term? Help needed by YaAbsolyutnoNikto
you don't need AGI to increase productivity 10x.
nutidizen t1_j7wpixo wrote
Reply to comment by Sad_Laugh_8337 in Generative AI comes to User Interface design! This is crazy. by RegularConstant
> Beware to all UX/UI designers -- AI is coming for your jobs and mine as well (software dev). It might look silly now (it doesn't to me) but a year is a HUGE amount of time for AI to develop -- it will replace us its a guarantee.
Go to r/programming and they will tell you how irreplaceable they are. lol
nutidizen t1_j6wuztf wrote
Reply to comment by Ishynethetruth in What is your opinion of what is going to happen between AGI and Singularity. by CertainMiddle2382
> who would hate cheap affordable housing
what is this conspiracy
nutidizen t1_j6wtwb8 wrote
Reply to comment by dgrsmith in GPT tool that lets you connect to databases and ask questions in text. by Mogen1000
> the knowledge requirements needed to tell the tool what tables do and what each of their columns mean requires a level of documentation that most companies don’t have reliably
See the potential. This is where this tool it's now. Where is it gonna be in a year? .)
nutidizen t1_j6k7qan wrote
Reply to comment by Substantial_Space478 in AI will not replace software developers, It will just drastically reduce the number of them. by masterile
> . A software developer's primary job is not rote programming but development and oversight
And AI can't do that why exactly?
nutidizen t1_j6g5nnm wrote
Reply to comment by Belostoma in OpenAI has hired an army of contractors to make basic coding obsolete by Buck-Nasty
AGI can do everything human can. And if AGI comes in 6 years...
nutidizen t1_j4n71ab wrote
It can already to that. It's just not available to the public as a free tool.
nutidizen t1_j3jktgk wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in A more realistic vision of the AI & Programmer's jobs story by DukkyDrake
> Everyone here also seems to think that if you scale up LLMs enough you suddenly get an intelligent system
Maybe not. But you will definitely get a system able to create software much more efficiently than any human.
nutidizen t1_j3j3kyy wrote
Most software developers I speak to just say it's a gimmick, blah blah blah. Completely ignoring the exponential technological growth and the law of accelerated returns. This shit is just a small preview of what's about to come.
nutidizen t1_j3j3e9w wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in A more realistic vision of the AI & Programmer's jobs story by DukkyDrake
I'm. Very large scale software I'm developing on day to day basis.
> ChatGPT is so so far away from taking developer jobs.
ChatGPT is. And it will never do that. Next AI might be closer than ChatGPT and it's not far away.
> It's not even really useful at all right now
I can already use it to explain some regex, outline some WinAPI calls, write documentation, do some repetetive code tasks.
> Nobody is 10xing their output because of ChatGPT unless they weren't a very good developer to begin with
I agree.
> If you actually pushed the code that it generated, your company would be out of business within the week.
You're completely disregarding the extremely fast progress that is right behind the doors...
nutidizen t1_j3hdol1 wrote
Reply to Will ChatGPT be able to write better code than any human within the next year? by [deleted]
Next year probably no. But I think in a few years it will be able to deliver complete working solutions just based on given prompt. Aka write a code for app that does X.
nutidizen t1_j3dxvev wrote
Reply to comment by AndromedaAnimated in Now that’s pretty significant! (By Anthropic) by MajorUnderstanding2
damn, it's good.
nutidizen t1_j2ezezx wrote
Reply to comment by Ok-Heat1513 in AGI and distribution of wealth by AndromedaAnimated
Here you go. You dont need to be an asshole next time. https://i.imgur.com/ScJIRVE.jpg
nutidizen t1_j2eqstj wrote
Reply to comment by Ok-Heat1513 in AGI and distribution of wealth by AndromedaAnimated
Very little people are struggling. And the number of people living in poverty is steadily decreasing.
nutidizen t1_j2crbg8 wrote
Reply to comment by Ok-Heat1513 in AGI and distribution of wealth by AndromedaAnimated
Serious question. I honestly wonder why are AI subteddits so full of outright Marxists and socialists
nutidizen t1_j2avvy5 wrote
Reply to comment by Ok-Heat1513 in AGI and distribution of wealth by AndromedaAnimated
Who is exploited in modern western capitalist society?
nutidizen t1_j0uei2g wrote
Reply to comment by Accomplished_Diver86 in Prediction: De-facto Pure AGI is going to be arriving next year. Pessimistically in 3 years. by Ace_Snowlight
> Do we even need AGI?
Well you can't stop it so....
nutidizen t1_j0s4owp wrote
> demonstrate their value by doing work
No.
> least theoretically serves the greater whole.
No? People act on the free market. Sell stuff (including your labor) for different stuff (eg. money).
nutidizen t1_izqa7hy wrote
Reply to comment by Swimming_Gain_4989 in I made the Pacman game by iteratively talking with chatGPT (chat log included) by DEATH_STAR_EXTRACTOR
chatgpt is not that good for factual stuff. But it's amazing for creative stuff. Kinda the opposite what a traditional computer performs well in.
nutidizen t1_jego43z wrote
Reply to comment by SkyeandJett in Meta AI: Robots that learn from videos of human activities and simulated interactions by TFenrir
What is capitalism to you?:)