DEATH_STAR_EXTRACTOR
DEATH_STAR_EXTRACTOR t1_j9lp6zf wrote
Reply to Why are we so stuck on using “AGI” as a useful term when it will be eclipsed by ASI in a relative heartbeat? by veritoast
Because once you build AGI, it takes about less than 1 year to reach ASI, and ASI 2, 3, and so on. I did the calculations....you need to remember if you make 1 AGI then you can clone its model like GPT-3 so you have now 1,000,000 of them run at the same time each doing a different job coding in their minds the next AGI2, and they already don't need sleep, and run 3 times faster, so they do more work than the 10,000 AGI pioneers currently because there is more them, doing 3*2=6 times the work suddenly, and know all the internet like chatGPT and GPT-3 know, and will improve their intelligence (recognition) algorithm too so they can better match old known memories to new unseen problems that appear actually truly similar so they can better know how to complete the rest of these "objects". Notice DALL-E completes objects....yes, pikachu no matter the style, pose, stretched even....try uncropping using dalle2 it is fun!
DEATH_STAR_EXTRACTOR t1_j9lo8ju wrote
Reply to comment by IndependenceRound453 in OpenAI has privately announced a new developer product called Foundry by flowday
LOL tru
DEATH_STAR_EXTRACTOR t1_j1sx4g1 wrote
I beleive we all will get luxury and then all will eventually beocme advanced nanobots.Your question is a bit hard for me to answer then, it's not well laid out really ....
i chose trnas human and glad i did...msot chose it! ya....we will be the robots soon, and we will be smarter and told what to do we wont have i.e. the dumb laws we have now!!!!! And, yes we all will have luxury....hence my chosen answer
Submitted by DEATH_STAR_EXTRACTOR t3_zi5jhb in singularity
DEATH_STAR_EXTRACTOR t1_izn39bs wrote
Reply to Progress of AI art. by jlpt1591
Ahaha :D Thanks for this! "same prompt", that makes the results so much more interesting to me.
DEATH_STAR_EXTRACTOR t1_itoxg0s wrote
Reply to comment by ActuaryGlittering16 in Given the exponential rate of improvement to prompt based image/video generation, in how many years do you think we'll see entire movies generated from a prompt? by yea_okay_dude
Imagen Video, Make-A-Video by Metal AI, Phenaki, and others.
DEATH_STAR_EXTRACTOR t1_itoxcm2 wrote
Reply to comment by Redvolition in Given the exponential rate of improvement to prompt based image/video generation, in how many years do you think we'll see entire movies generated from a prompt? by yea_okay_dude
But why is the first NUWA vr1 from 10 months ago only about 900M parameters and can do face prediction like shown etc and Imagen Video which is 11B parameters or so can do what it can do. I mean it doesn't look like Imagen Video is so much better. I know it can do words in leaves n all but I feel it can come out the same if given frame rate improvement and upscaling and more data/bigger brain. Yes there's a evaluation score but I'm talking about by eye.
DEATH_STAR_EXTRACTOR t1_itowpzk wrote
Reply to comment by HumanSeeing in Given the exponential rate of improvement to prompt based image/video generation, in how many years do you think we'll see entire movies generated from a prompt? by yea_okay_dude
I agree. This is what I'm saying, I wonder if even I started this trend. I mean I just started saying this or thinking this this year.
DEATH_STAR_EXTRACTOR t1_irnyo6p wrote
Reply to comment by AgginSwaggin in When do you think we'll have AGI, if at all? by intergalacticskyline
Yes good idea to see it change over time. We need to revote. Also save these stats in case they get deleted.
DEATH_STAR_EXTRACTOR t1_j9mbghp wrote
Reply to Google search activity for AI over the past 19 years by elevenvolt
measured in, millions?