its_broo_skeh_tuh

its_broo_skeh_tuh t1_jd6lsvq wrote

Horrible mismanagement of the covid response, in his efforts to deforest the Amazon he displaced many people, he said his son would be dead to him if he was gay, and also lowered barriers to get access to firearms which led to a huge jump in firearm ownership despite the country having way too many problems with gun violence already.

3

its_broo_skeh_tuh t1_jd6kujn wrote

You can and are sort of required to if you are abroad. You can get exemptions but it’s hard to justify when the Brazilian consulate is so close. There were a few public gatherings in NYC where voters kind of protested at each other. So I guess it’s for other brazilians

3

its_broo_skeh_tuh t1_j8sw5p0 wrote

I don’t necessarily think they’d do something malicious but there is a lot less accountability because when your pet comes out they’re like everything’s fine! Even though they didn’t check everything and the vet dodges any conversation with you. I feel for vets because they genuinely care for animals and they deal with a lot, and I know some pet owners are absolute assholes, but at the end of the day I am generally the best advocate for MY pet and this care model removes me from the conversation. This is just my experience. I would feel more comfortable if they were better at communicating, maybe that’s the issue.

1

its_broo_skeh_tuh t1_j8pylej wrote

My dog’s vet still does this. The vet techs who I interface with out front do not wear masks to talk to the owners and I doubt the vets are wearing them as well. I think they figured out that it was much easier to conduct the visit without owners in the room and don’t want to change back. However, I find it quite annoying when I have questions, it’s not really a good experience when you have specific concerns and you’re playing telephone with a vet tech.

4