inconsistent_test
inconsistent_test t1_isy44fs wrote
Reply to Warehouse giants like Amazon and others are desperate for more robots, but human workers worry they make the job more dangerous by Sorin61
Well don't worry, they absolutely do make it more dangerous.
inconsistent_test OP t1_isdub02 wrote
Reply to comment by Gorf_the_Magnificent in LPT: When a News company posts an op-ed, it's wise to approach the article with the same level of skepticism as you would a tabloid or a rando social media rant. by inconsistent_test
That's why I carefully used the word article.
inconsistent_test OP t1_isdt16w wrote
Reply to comment by crazybaker42 in LPT: When a News company posts an op-ed, it's wise to approach the article with the same level of skepticism as you would a tabloid or a rando social media rant. by inconsistent_test
That's why it's important to be able to identify the differences between a tabloid quality article/op-ed and a news article that's even worth investigating. We all only have so much time in the day, save yourself the trouble and skip the op-eds or lower quality.
Tabloids are essentially junk tv level of information.
inconsistent_test OP t1_isdsrys wrote
inconsistent_test OP t1_isdsnjo wrote
Reply to comment by snoobsnob in LPT: When a News company posts an op-ed, it's wise to approach the article with the same level of skepticism as you would a tabloid or a rando social media rant. by inconsistent_test
I think your idea of tabloid skepticism and mine are different.
I'll give you an idea. I don't read tabloids.
inconsistent_test OP t1_iscryh3 wrote
Reply to comment by DroolingSlothCarpet in LPT: When a News company posts an op-ed, it's wise to approach the article with the same level of skepticism as you would a tabloid or a rando social media rant. by inconsistent_test
r/confidentlyincorrect
inconsistent_test OP t1_iscroog wrote
Reply to comment by DroolingSlothCarpet in LPT: When a News company posts an op-ed, it's wise to approach the article with the same level of skepticism as you would a tabloid or a rando social media rant. by inconsistent_test
Okay pal. Go look up article when you get a chance. Ttyl.
inconsistent_test OP t1_iscrfkt wrote
Reply to comment by DroolingSlothCarpet in LPT: When a News company posts an op-ed, it's wise to approach the article with the same level of skepticism as you would a tabloid or a rando social media rant. by inconsistent_test
You have a fundamental misunderstanding of the word article bud.
inconsistent_test OP t1_iscpuhd wrote
Reply to comment by DroolingSlothCarpet in LPT: When a News company posts an op-ed, it's wise to approach the article with the same level of skepticism as you would a tabloid or a rando social media rant. by inconsistent_test
#"Article: A piece of writing included with others in a newspaper, magazine, or other publication."
Fairly confident that statement is incorrect.
inconsistent_test OP t1_iscolmd wrote
Reply to comment by Dr_Edge_ATX in LPT: When a News company posts an op-ed, it's wise to approach the article with the same level of skepticism as you would a tabloid or a rando social media rant. by inconsistent_test
The point of journalism is to ask questions, not to use their own opinion to answer them. Not everything is propaganda. Just because intent exists behind a question does not mean it's intent to deceive.
I suspect you are confusing entertainment television for news when you typed that.
inconsistent_test OP t1_iscdsoc wrote
inconsistent_test OP t1_iscddpl wrote
Reply to comment by Gemmabeta in LPT: When a News company posts an op-ed, it's wise to approach the article with the same level of skepticism as you would a tabloid or a rando social media rant. by inconsistent_test
A very good addition, thank you.
inconsistent_test t1_iu0afn5 wrote
Reply to I Took an Amazon Warehouse Job to Cure My Burnout by Mynameis__--__
No you didn't.