How is this news whatsoever

Was there any purpose to relate it so a specific culture's concept within the title rather than another's? It's an odd and out of place addition

The government can't manage anything properly but when a private company does something bad all of the sudden you believe they can? Yeah nah

Why is the fan going to Poland to help Ukraine relevant either?

I'm objectively analyzing your comment, I'm not a part of the above interaction

It wasn't humor it was just a rude comment, you're just a jerk bro

Thanks for the follow up comment I was about to rage about the statistics thing

Lots of people here are teenagers. The other half didn't pay attention in high school and force others to argue with them.

Your claim:

So, now you invent that in 1. there was something about NATO not expanding, which is untrue.

Is 100% false.

Incomplete data on the OPs part to extend the political stance of the west by not recognizing it personally. OP doesn't realize that by withholding data from the origin country's census he only creates more controversy

Spoils of war after being conquered by the USSR during their co invasion with Nazi Germany, you are correct:

After the German-Soviet invasion of Poland in 1939, Lviv became part of the Soviet Union.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lviv

There is no purpose to your latter political anecdote other than to inject your own opinion

Please don't mislead the public with disinformation:

https://nsarchive.gwu.edu/briefing-book/russia-programs/2017-12-12/nato-expansion-what-gorbachev-heard-western-leaders-early

The documents reinforce former CIA Director Robert Gates’s criticism of “pressing ahead with expansion of NATO eastward [in the 1990s], when Gorbachev and others were led to believe that wouldn’t happen.”[1] The key phrase, buttressed by the documents, is “led to believe.”

...

This latter idea of special status for the GDR territory was codified in the final German unification treaty signed on September 12, 1990, by the Two-Plus-Four foreign ministers (see Document 25).

...

The documents show that Gorbachev agreed to German unification in NATO as the result of this cascade of assurance

...

According to the Russian memorandum of conversation, “Woerner stressed that the NATO Council and he are against the expansion of NATO (13 of 16 NATO members support this point of view).” (See Document 30)

Thus, Gorbachev went to the end of the Soviet Union assured that the West was not threatening his security and was not expanding NATO

...

NATO’s expansion was years in the future, when these disputes would erupt again, and more assurances would come to Russian leader Boris Yeltsin.

Just because you don't accept it doesn't make it real, you're getting a bit ahead of the point on why you disagree with it. I noted as such in my initial counterpoint where I said that data exists, people just believe it's manipulated. You believe it's manipulated and thus won't accept it, but that does not mean that it does not exist. You claimed that there was no data, I showed you the data. You cannot write it off either as its being used as one of the main claims by Russia. To them its very real and not manipulated. We cannot pretend it doesn't exist because we don't like it. That is the only point I have to make, that your original claim of no data existing is inaccurate. It does exist, it's simply not accepted by the west. There is a difference between nonexistence and nonacceptance.

You seem to be debating the data and are elaborating on why you think it's manipulative, that's not the point. You made a claim that there's no statistical data to back it up. I said there was, it was just contested, and provided a link. The only point is that there is data, contrary to your initial claim

You replied to someone talking about Crimea, there was a referendum and most of the west doesn't accept it. This is the evidence to my counterclaim that his words are indeed supported by data, people just don't agree with it as they believe it's manipulated:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/2014_Crimean_status_referendum

They are, people just don't agree with the data as they believe it's manipulated

Many nations involved have broken international agreements signed in the 90s

And said territory was a part of Poland post WW1

Russia has over 190 ethnic groups, it's a federation not an ethnostate

Someone will post their implementation on github soon if they haven't already. All we really need is an open source dataset and we'd be good to go. Barrier to entry only being setting up the AWS instance to train your model.

This would allow different communities to develop their own datasets - if programmers pulled together with the ChatGPT hype to make a large programming dataset, we'd have a much more capable github copilot relatively soon.

Just need the open source datasets and an implementation; the later usually comes but the former is elusive.

Anyone who believes OP is a virgin, including OP