TheLAriver
TheLAriver t1_ja33hll wrote
Reply to 1928 newspaper found underneath carpet in old farmhouse. Anyone know the case by Equivalent-Pay1681
Of course, it's famous
TheLAriver t1_j686dnq wrote
Tepid
TheLAriver t1_j5y9iiq wrote
Reply to comment by MrMark77 in I got cut off by a taxi driver last week. I was walking through town today and I saw him at the back of the queue at the taxi rank. I got in the first taxi in the queue and said "How much to the station ?" "$5" said the driver. "And how much for a blow job ?" I asked him. by AdeptLengthiness8886
He doesn't exist
TheLAriver t1_iysuatt wrote
Reply to Dancing Wednesday 2022 by AliceTrippDaGain
Oof
TheLAriver t1_iy4z7lr wrote
Reply to comment by 1leggeddog in Eye-tracking study suggests that negative comments on social media are more attention-grabbing than positive comments by giuliomagnifico
We don't need data. We already have data. This was already common knowledge and not debated before this study existed. But it's also already been studied plenty.
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1940161214524832
No one is gonna be challenged for sharing this opinion. It's so commonly held that some people have felt the need to try to push back against it with focuses on positive news.
I also don't see how this study would have any impact on policy. It's not a question that's relevant to legal policy. Unless you're hoping to live in some kind of fascist dystopia where your online activity is evaluated for negativity.
TheLAriver t1_je062wt wrote
Reply to Our bathroom, which is now complete by RingsTheRover
Do you have a mustache tattoo on your finger?