RoseIsBadWolf

RoseIsBadWolf t1_jecw6kc wrote

I skip or skim gratuitous description, like in the Wheel of Time series. I usually don't miss anything important.

If I really like a book, I read it again and attempt not to skim. But honestly, even re-reading Lord of the Rings I'm like, "Do I really need to know about the grass that grew on this grave?"

3

RoseIsBadWolf t1_je9h9n8 wrote

I've only read Agnes Grey, The Tenant of Wildfell Hall, and Jane Eyre.

I liked them all but Tenant is my absolute favorite. I wish they taught it more in school. It's so relevant today and so important. The way Helen just walks by all these red flags and married Arthur is chilling. The middle part I read as fast as I can just to get her out!

I wish that book was more popular!

2

RoseIsBadWolf t1_je7okwi wrote

Whats great about TGG is that it shows for all America's bluster about throwing off the old ways , most rich people are still inheritors of generational wealth, the exact thing America was trying to escape from.

Daisy Buchanan would be at home in a Jane Austen novel. She doesn't marry the American Dreamer, she marries the trust fund kid who never has to work a day in his life.

7

RoseIsBadWolf t1_je7n9vx wrote

The American Dream, start at the bottom and work your way up to being a millionaire. Get the hot girl whom you don't really see as a person. Move to a coast (y'all love New York or California)

By the way, we consume a ton of your media and news (it gets boring up here). We're your slightly colder stalkers. We know everything about you.

I knew George Washington before I knew about John A. MacDonald (our first prime minister).

7

RoseIsBadWolf t1_je7l1zx wrote

Creole in this era meant (most of the time) a white, British person born abroad. I don't think anything in the book indicates otherwise.

British people believed that being born abroad/living abroad could mess you up. But Bertha is probably white.

Charlotte Brontë's beef with the French is kind of hilarious though.

3

RoseIsBadWolf t1_je7jro1 wrote

I think it's interesting to talk about how weird Jane Eyre is as a person. She's got strange ideas and rage and very intense love in her. Most people find her off-putting. Rochester calls her a "changeling" or a fairy a lot and he's not just being strange himself.

Rochester seems to like that brand of odd while St. John tries to crush it out of her.

3

RoseIsBadWolf t1_ja8ysl9 wrote

I found St. John absolutely terrifying, like cult leader sort of energy. Yet the writer seems to leave him on a good note? It was crazy for me.

However, I think the contrast is clear, Rochester is someone who actually loves Jane, but as questionable morals, and St. John loves no one as far as I can tell but has "perfect" morals (though according to the actual Bible that dude is not going to heaven because works without love is meaningless, but anywho). Jane rejects a life of duty without love and returns to Rochester because she cannot live without love.

Better ending: St. John peaces out to India and Jane and her two awesome female cousins live together in tranquility.

3

RoseIsBadWolf t1_j6fn48l wrote

Jane Austen wraps up a lot of her books quickly, especially Perusasion, Northanger Abbey and Mansfield Park. When she's done, she's done.

At least we know that Henry and Catherine have their happy ending.

Also, if you want to discuss more, there is r/JaneAusten

1

RoseIsBadWolf t1_j2fpcj5 wrote

Maybe if you do it well.

Mansfield Park 1999 didn't. Instead of showing how a moral person can believe that their income from slavery is moral, they just turned Sir Thomas into an irredeemable monster. But then inexplicably at the end he's redeemed and gets out of slavery... for no reason.

A good adaptation might have showed how all of society was involved in slavery through sugar and tea, and examined how someone can justify owning sugar plantations to themselves.

But nuance isn't Hollywood's strong point. The message "slavery bad" is so obvious and overdone.

(Mansfield Park by Jane Austen)

6

RoseIsBadWolf t1_iydfw2i wrote

Not a style per-se, but I really dislike covers that show the characters, be it romance or whatever genre, and then the characters don't look like the book descriptions.

Like cover, you had ONE JOB.

This may be the reason I prefer covers without character pictures. So the recent trend of not showing characters is fine by me.

2

RoseIsBadWolf t1_ixx52or wrote

Try reading the book as a commentary about what the real people at the top do with their lives. They aren't actually helping society, or using their money for good, they are selfish and they suck.

Gatsby comes into great wealth and blows it all trying to attract a girl. Tom Buchanan is a racist and he doesn't want to admit anyone into his class. Daisy literally married just for money and status. Nick is watching them all with disgust and he invites you to join him.

−4