RoseIsBadWolf
RoseIsBadWolf t1_jecw6kc wrote
I skip or skim gratuitous description, like in the Wheel of Time series. I usually don't miss anything important.
If I really like a book, I read it again and attempt not to skim. But honestly, even re-reading Lord of the Rings I'm like, "Do I really need to know about the grass that grew on this grave?"
RoseIsBadWolf t1_je9h9n8 wrote
Reply to The Brontë Sisters by carrotwhirl
I've only read Agnes Grey, The Tenant of Wildfell Hall, and Jane Eyre.
I liked them all but Tenant is my absolute favorite. I wish they taught it more in school. It's so relevant today and so important. The way Helen just walks by all these red flags and married Arthur is chilling. The middle part I read as fast as I can just to get her out!
I wish that book was more popular!
RoseIsBadWolf t1_je7pd5d wrote
Reply to comment by Different-Carpet-159 in non United States folks: what do you think of The Great Gatsby? by Different-Carpet-159
Yes we have about the same rural/urban divide as the United States (my parents own a farm, I live in a city).
Check our election maps, the countryside is blue (conservative) and the cities are red (liberal) or yellow (NDP or very liberal).
RoseIsBadWolf t1_je7okwi wrote
Reply to comment by Different-Carpet-159 in non United States folks: what do you think of The Great Gatsby? by Different-Carpet-159
Whats great about TGG is that it shows for all America's bluster about throwing off the old ways , most rich people are still inheritors of generational wealth, the exact thing America was trying to escape from.
Daisy Buchanan would be at home in a Jane Austen novel. She doesn't marry the American Dreamer, she marries the trust fund kid who never has to work a day in his life.
RoseIsBadWolf t1_je7n9vx wrote
Reply to comment by Different-Carpet-159 in non United States folks: what do you think of The Great Gatsby? by Different-Carpet-159
The American Dream, start at the bottom and work your way up to being a millionaire. Get the hot girl whom you don't really see as a person. Move to a coast (y'all love New York or California)
By the way, we consume a ton of your media and news (it gets boring up here). We're your slightly colder stalkers. We know everything about you.
I knew George Washington before I knew about John A. MacDonald (our first prime minister).
RoseIsBadWolf t1_je7l1zx wrote
Reply to comment by WindySkies in Need some help from Jane Eyre fans... by poohfan
Creole in this era meant (most of the time) a white, British person born abroad. I don't think anything in the book indicates otherwise.
British people believed that being born abroad/living abroad could mess you up. But Bertha is probably white.
Charlotte Brontë's beef with the French is kind of hilarious though.
RoseIsBadWolf t1_je7jro1 wrote
Reply to Need some help from Jane Eyre fans... by poohfan
I think it's interesting to talk about how weird Jane Eyre is as a person. She's got strange ideas and rage and very intense love in her. Most people find her off-putting. Rochester calls her a "changeling" or a fairy a lot and he's not just being strange himself.
Rochester seems to like that brand of odd while St. John tries to crush it out of her.
RoseIsBadWolf t1_je7dc4v wrote
Reply to comment by soph_sol in non United States folks: what do you think of The Great Gatsby? by Different-Carpet-159
Also Canadian, also thought it was great at depicting American ideals.
I love the book though.
RoseIsBadWolf t1_ja8ysl9 wrote
Reply to Jane Eyre vol 3 - What am I missing? by [deleted]
I found St. John absolutely terrifying, like cult leader sort of energy. Yet the writer seems to leave him on a good note? It was crazy for me.
However, I think the contrast is clear, Rochester is someone who actually loves Jane, but as questionable morals, and St. John loves no one as far as I can tell but has "perfect" morals (though according to the actual Bible that dude is not going to heaven because works without love is meaningless, but anywho). Jane rejects a life of duty without love and returns to Rochester because she cannot live without love.
Better ending: St. John peaces out to India and Jane and her two awesome female cousins live together in tranquility.
RoseIsBadWolf t1_j9n1yaa wrote
This may be a case of a high demand genre that not many people are writing in so the threshold for publication has been lowered in order for the publishers to offer something, anything.
RoseIsBadWolf t1_j7do5pd wrote
Reply to Pride and Prejudice to me is the epitome of romance novels but I recently found something about Elizabeth that I disliked by nyanyaneko2
Remember though, Elizabeth didn't flatter Darcy because she disliked him. She was often trying to make him angry; she wasn't trying to be different.
She's almost saying that he likes being insulted 😅
RoseIsBadWolf t1_j6fqwx4 wrote
Reply to comment by emi-wankenobi in Why does Northanger Abbey end in such a hurry? by Recent-Bird
Don't worry too much, the navy hardly played a part. Mostly just trope and message carrying and making a blockade around France. They had already destroyed the French Navy.
But she did clearly do that on purpose.
RoseIsBadWolf t1_j6fq9qq wrote
Reply to comment by emi-wankenobi in Why does Northanger Abbey end in such a hurry? by Recent-Bird
And did you catch that Wentworth proposed the day Napoleon escaped from Elba?
Another war there shall be!
RoseIsBadWolf t1_j6fn74f wrote
Reply to comment by emi-wankenobi in Why does Northanger Abbey end in such a hurry? by Recent-Bird
Perusasion is pretty abrupt too!
RoseIsBadWolf t1_j6fn48l wrote
Jane Austen wraps up a lot of her books quickly, especially Perusasion, Northanger Abbey and Mansfield Park. When she's done, she's done.
At least we know that Henry and Catherine have their happy ending.
Also, if you want to discuss more, there is r/JaneAusten
RoseIsBadWolf t1_j65jhkc wrote
Reply to comment by ahsataN-Natasha in After 30+ years, 'The Stinky Cheese Man' is aging well by drak0bsidian
Oh man I need to buy this book for my kids!
RoseIsBadWolf t1_j4t9nb9 wrote
Don't read stuff you don't like, if you are reading for pleasure. There are plenty of other classics that you might like better. If you hate long-winded description, the answer is Austen.
RoseIsBadWolf t1_j2fpcj5 wrote
Reply to Do you think it's valid to adapt a book to a movie/series, insert a modern political agenda and change story? by SpecialistHot7416
Maybe if you do it well.
Mansfield Park 1999 didn't. Instead of showing how a moral person can believe that their income from slavery is moral, they just turned Sir Thomas into an irredeemable monster. But then inexplicably at the end he's redeemed and gets out of slavery... for no reason.
A good adaptation might have showed how all of society was involved in slavery through sugar and tea, and examined how someone can justify owning sugar plantations to themselves.
But nuance isn't Hollywood's strong point. The message "slavery bad" is so obvious and overdone.
(Mansfield Park by Jane Austen)
RoseIsBadWolf t1_j0o7cnw wrote
Reply to comment by Honeycrispcombe in Is the handmaid's tale poorly written? by Singto_
Interesting.
I feel like I usually like all of what an author has written. I probably wouldn't have tried Atwood again but I went camping and someone brought the book along.
RoseIsBadWolf t1_j0mo4wf wrote
Reply to Is the handmaid's tale poorly written? by Singto_
I tried to read it and couldn't get through.
But I LOVED Oryx and Craike. So maybe it just wasn't my thing.
RoseIsBadWolf t1_iyesxmf wrote
Reply to comment by Suspiciously_Flawed in I do not think the Great Gatsby is a critique of American society by Suspiciously_Flawed
Wealth is the focus though. At one point Gatsby literally says that Daisy's voice sounds like money. She is not really a person to him, more of a representation of the wealthy elite that he wants to join.
RoseIsBadWolf t1_iydfw2i wrote
Not a style per-se, but I really dislike covers that show the characters, be it romance or whatever genre, and then the characters don't look like the book descriptions.
Like cover, you had ONE JOB.
This may be the reason I prefer covers without character pictures. So the recent trend of not showing characters is fine by me.
RoseIsBadWolf t1_ixx52or wrote
Reply to I don't like The Great Gatsby by francisf0reverr
Try reading the book as a commentary about what the real people at the top do with their lives. They aren't actually helping society, or using their money for good, they are selfish and they suck.
Gatsby comes into great wealth and blows it all trying to attract a girl. Tom Buchanan is a racist and he doesn't want to admit anyone into his class. Daisy literally married just for money and status. Nick is watching them all with disgust and he invites you to join him.
Submitted by RoseIsBadWolf t3_z1ttxa in books
RoseIsBadWolf t1_jegg5t7 wrote
Reply to Would Lord of the Flies be the same story if it was boys and girls stranded on the island instead of just boys? by Ill_Definition8074
Lord of the Flies stuff has happened and it has never been like LoftF. People generally cooperate to survive.
When society is lost, humans just build new societies. We like them.