Primo2000
Primo2000 t1_jd6r6ih wrote
Reply to Should we expect jncremental access to already available AI capabilities or is what we see is where things largely are? by gaudiocomplex
openai has problem meeting demand for what gpt-4 in its current form is capable of. Adding features like pics or videos would create even more strain on the system so even if this model has additional capabilities and it probably does, they simply need some time to make it work for such high traffic
Primo2000 t1_j6o12q0 wrote
Reply to comment by Pink_Revolutionary in OpenAI once wanted to save the world. Now it’s chasing profit by informednews
Difference is quantity i doubt they would get 10 bilions without promise of profits
Primo2000 t1_j6mw6jw wrote
Reply to comment by alexiuss in OpenAI once wanted to save the world. Now it’s chasing profit by informednews
Problem is open source will be behind openai in terms of compute, dont remember exact numbers but it costs fortune to run chatgpt and they have great discount in microsoft
Primo2000 t1_j6maswc wrote
Well, you need profits to create large scale AI. AGI is not something that will be build by cyberpunks beneath sewers of neo-tokyo it will be build by large corporation utilizing a lot of money and compute.
Primo2000 t1_j6i2zq1 wrote
Reply to comment by starstruckmon in Meta's chief AI scientist says "ChatGPT is not innovative". by ZaKodiak
ah yes, my bad, thanks
Primo2000 t1_j6hd34t wrote
Might be not exciting or innovative for guy who has access to latest google AI and compute but it is revolutionary for millions of peoples who are not meta chief AI scientist, so unless google come up with product available to general public they should stfu
Primo2000 t1_j4p9vy3 wrote
Reply to Is it wishful thinking that I feel like we’re way closer than we thought? by fignewtgingrich
Maybe from technological standpoint but it will take time for humans to adopt it. You have long term contract signed and whole business models centered around people so this will take some time and when it comes to biology, medicine etc there are blockers such as FDA that will slow adoptions of new medicines a lot. Still i think we are reaching some kind of treshold point when things will really start to take off
Primo2000 t1_j2elc7d wrote
Reply to comment by Pro_RazE in Happy New Year Everyone. It's time to accelerate even more 🤠 by Pro_RazE
chatgpt2 running on gpt-4;)))
Primo2000 t1_j1f6f4b wrote
Reply to Am I the only one on this sub that believes AI actually will bring more jobs (especially in tech)? by raylolSW
Cloud infrastructure is good example of what you are saying. When i started in IT on prem infrastructure was handled by whole departments and people used to have specializations like backup engineer, networking etc. With cloud and infrastructure as a code single devops can handle whole infrastructure part of the project. This didn't kill IT engineers job, instead it create a lot new project opportunities, only folks that weren't willing to change specialization might have problem finding job now.
Same thing will probably happen to coding now and just instead of multiply devs working on project one will be able to handle whole coding side of project as somebody still needs to doublecheck that before it gets pushed to production(in most cases we are handling sensitive user data)
A lot of peoples in the world don't even have refrigerators, there is a lot to do in automation till all of this becomes saturated
Primo2000 t1_izwly5n wrote
There is way more to programming then shuffling bits around and i dont see any manager approving ai generating code to be pushed to production servers.
Also i think there is 0% there will be no musicans in 5 years
Primo2000 t1_iyjdrc7 wrote
Reply to Is my career soon to be nonexistent? by apyrexvision
I started my career in IT as on prem engineer, it took whole departments to run infrastructure for given project, fast forward 10 years and now i work as senior azure devops, it is possible for me alone to create and run whole infrastructure for given project. That doesnt mean most engineers are out of work now, on the contrary i can choose from hundreds of projects with simply wouldnt be economically feasable in the past.
But yeah guys who failed to change speciality and are stuck with old specializations are starting to have problem finding jobs now.
Primo2000 t1_itwfs5u wrote
Reply to comment by Recent-Fish-9233 in Lots of posts here talk about how AI advancements and automation are going to inevitably replace jobs. As someone without interest or acumen in programming or IT, what sort of "future-proof" field(s) should I be looking into as a way to maintain (for lack of a better term) viability? by doctordaedalus
Or maybe there will be right ammount of programmers, right now a lot of projects cant start because managers cant find devs and infrastructure/devops people so i wouldnt be suprised that with reduced cost and team size actually a lot more projects could start.
Same with manufacturing automation, we need to remebmer that a lot of people still dont have fridges, washing machines etc so there is a lot of room to grow a cost will decrease
Primo2000 t1_itw0d9b wrote
Reply to comment by AdditionalPizza in Lots of posts here talk about how AI advancements and automation are going to inevitably replace jobs. As someone without interest or acumen in programming or IT, what sort of "future-proof" field(s) should I be looking into as a way to maintain (for lack of a better term) viability? by doctordaedalus
Not a single manager would allow pushing automated code to production servers so i think people with programing skills will still be needed even if most of the code will be automated in the future, to review and to troubleschoot etc. There is much more to IT project then just writing code.
Primo2000 t1_irmcqcs wrote
r/Transhuman
Primo2000 t1_jdzug6k wrote
Reply to comment by fluffy_assassins in Are the big CEO/ultra-responsible/ultra-high-paying positions in business currently(or within the next year) threatened by AI? by fluffy_assassins
I suspect this is just publicity stunt