MrBoliNica

MrBoliNica t1_j5tfria wrote

And also…I didn’t realize it was illegal to give someone money and them committing a crime with it- even if you didn’t know about it. I guess they were trying to prove that because he read the book, he knew- but how can they prove that? Wouldn’t his wife (the only witness) have spousal privilege?

Like I said, of all the “crimes” he could have done, they chose the weakest one

3

MrBoliNica t1_j5pczzw wrote

The show has an interesting premise. But this debuts “twist” ie- what the guy was accused of doing- hit me with a huge “really??” When it was revealed. Like that’s what we’re going with here???

Of all the teases the episode was giving you, felt like it chose the most boring option for the character to be going to trial over

21

MrBoliNica t1_iy0hhp9 wrote

Was he rational in season 3? We forgetting the storyline where he stalked a whole other woman, and murdered her husband? He did all that he did to Love, just so he could escape and follow Marianne. He didn’t do it to be a good person or help the people love was hurting lol

1