Markantonpeterson
Markantonpeterson t1_j4xjbuy wrote
Reply to comment by yes_but_not_that in Victim of Andrew Callaghan (Channel5) responds to his 'Apology' by [deleted]
> but then bring it right back with words like "consequence" and "held accountable". Both those words imply pushing someone to the brink of suicide was deserved.
Woah, WHAT THE FUCK? How the F U C K is that implied? What is wrong with you people? You act like "held accountable" is some vague thing, it fucking isn't. It's actually what Andrew started in his public response. All i'm saying is it's not the end of him taking accountability. Losing his deal with Tim and Eric is part of it to. It's whatever the fuck happens. I was arrested in high school. What happened is everyone I knew learned about it. I was suspended from school and my sports team. I'm not leading some public shaming campaign. I'm explaining why he's facing repercussions. Your claiming i'm advocating for his fucking suicide? What the flying fuck is the matter with you? I'm a huge fan of his, i'm gutted by this. Fuck you people. Seriously, the responses i'm getting here make me fucking sick.
Markantonpeterson t1_j4xc4og wrote
Reply to comment by yes_but_not_that in Victim of Andrew Callaghan (Channel5) responds to his 'Apology' by [deleted]
Lmao, what an odd response. I wasn't moving goal posts, I was responding to his explanation of why it's cancel culture.
The point of this isn't to hurt Andrew. That's a byproduct of him being held accountable. I'm not saying Tim and Eric have to cut ties, i'm explaining why they did. Who is saying that it's necessary to hurt him? You are arguing that this shouldn't ruin his career, but what does that entail? His partners need to keep working with him and his fans can't stop watching him? Anything else is cancel culture?
Markantonpeterson t1_j4wzlvd wrote
Reply to comment by streetbum in Victim of Andrew Callaghan (Channel5) responds to his 'Apology' by [deleted]
Again.. you're just listing consequences. These accusations aren't minor, it wasn't just one or two. It wasn't just a politically incorrect tweet. It is a serious situation. I think that's the main disconnect here, I don't think you agree with how serious it is. It seems obvious to me people aren't just gonna accept an apology for this and pretend like nothing happened. Tim and Eric don't want to be associated with someone who sexually assaulted someone. He said he was taking actions to fix his behavior, but that doesn't mean everything's suddenly all good. And if there were no repercussions for what happened he may not change at all. People should know that if you sexually assault multiple people that you may lose a big partnership with public figures. Your community may go against you. That just seems fair to me. I also don't think it's a new cultural thing, other then people now care about sexual assault.
Markantonpeterson t1_j4wwzd1 wrote
Reply to comment by streetbum in Victim of Andrew Callaghan (Channel5) responds to his 'Apology' by [deleted]
So cancel culture is OP putting apology in quotes? I'd agree it's an unnecessary way to frame it, but not sure why it's a dead giveaway that cancel culture exists. And if you look at the whole response to the controversy as "cancel culture", then that's just dumb. I'm a huge fan of Channel 5 and Andrew, but this shit is fucked up, and an apology is so far from absolving him here. Especially when it was undoubtedly a planned PR move, I do think it was genuine, but it's still very much based around saving his career. I would just call this "dealing with the consequences", not cancel culture.
Markantonpeterson t1_j7fvg2c wrote
Reply to Video from epicenter of earthquake in Kahramanmaras , Turkey shows the city has been destroyed. by LillyTheElf
How do you even come back from something like this. All of these buildings probably need to be demolished and rebuilt right?