From the article:

>she turned cash stuffing into a business — Baddies and Budgets — through which she sells money courses, budgeting supplies and other accessories.

Her website literally does sell physical envelopes. She did not write a piece of software to help people budget.

Of course not! Everyone knows PepsiCo already holds the trademark for Pilk™. https://twitter.com/cl0ckw0rk951/status/1598719500790243332?t=QtSryOfkDvZkasmEhhDfrQ&s=19

After a half hour of Tineye / searching, the best I can find is this comment on a previous posting of the video:

"Theater, and there were reports on the driver and what may have been in his vehicle. He's still alive and well to my knowledge."

https://www.reddit.com/r/videos/comments/det4m7/comment/f2z82dz/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x&context=3

Admitting my ignorance but I'm not a fan of flag guessing game graphs like this. I don't have every European flag memorized, especially Poland.

Yes, my last paragraph said that adding salt is clearly better. Reread the OP's question, they aren't asking what's better in practice. They want to know what lasts longer.

If we assume a perfectly insulating cooler, both methods last forever and it's a tie.

This is a great explanation that ignores the OP's question.

I will bet anyone that does this experiment 5 bucks that adding the salt actually makes the coldness last less time, because liquid water conducts heat into the walls of the cooler faster than solid ice does. The energy absorbed by the phase change and the fish are distractions from the actual question, which is what lasts longer. And the only thing that matters for this calculation is how fast the heat gets through the walls of the cooler. And the still air around the unmelted chunks of ice is a better insulator than the liquid water.

I completely agree that the salt is better, since cooling the fish down quickly will make the fish stay fresher longer. Again though, this is not what OP asked.

Removing zero from the axis was fine, almost no reviewers use the entire 10 point range for games. A 6/10 is widely considered terrible and a failure.

If strongest and weakest were shown on top of each other, it would be good to have them use the same range, though.

Don't underestimate the effect of the target age group either. My kids aren't old enough write reviews but they liked Pokemon Shield. Plus it was their first "real" Pokemon game so they don't really have anything to compare it to.

Adults know how much money Pokemon earns and how much it costs to make amazing graphics, plus they've played all the previous games so they have higher expectations.

What column are you using for user ratings? Because I went to the myanimelist site and most of the Mecha anime that released in 1987 were rated at a 5 or 6, and Patlabor was a 7. What Mecha anime released in 1987 that was so widely loathed?

Every article with one of these BS claims needs to immediately point out how safe the pills are. This kind of "both sides" journalism is extremely irresponsible. It is FAR safer for the mother to take an abortion pill than carry a baby to term.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22270271/