CyberneticPanda
CyberneticPanda t1_jbjp2bu wrote
Reply to comment by PuddyVanHird in Is there a fertile creature with an odd number of chromosomes? by TheBloxyBloxGuy
The Y Chromosome is mostly non-coding DNA. We know that it has been losing genes for millions of years. The reason it shrinks while others don't is that it has no duplicate partner to repair itself from, like every other chromosome has including the X chromosome, though X only has a partner in women. We also know that it has been lost in other mammals. Some of them found alternative ways to keep producing males. We don't know for sure, but it is a reasonable hypothesis that others did not and went extinct.
CyberneticPanda t1_jbi8ed9 wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Is there a fertile creature with an odd number of chromosomes? by TheBloxyBloxGuy
It's SRY that gets lost, and it would probably not get lost all at once, but instead get a mutation that makes it work less well and shifts the chances of being born male lower. That will create selective pressure for the mutation near SOX9 (or another that substitutes for SRY) to spread through the population.
CyberneticPanda t1_jbi6tye wrote
Reply to comment by actuallyserious650 in Is there a fertile creature with an odd number of chromosomes? by TheBloxyBloxGuy
That is happening right now. The Y chromosome used to be bigger and is shrinking and will be gone in a few million years. Most mammals have a similar situation to humans, who have an X chromosome with 900 genes and a Y chromosome with 55 genes. One of those 55 genes is the one that causes male sex characteristics to start to develop - don't tell your right wing friends, but everyone is female at first and the males TRANSform at about 9 weeks.
The platypus has 2 equal sized sex chromosomes, and we diverged from them evolutionarily 166 million years ago. We have lost 845 Y chromosome genes in that time, which means we will lose the rest in about 11 million years. All is not lost, though.
We know of a couple of other mammals that lost their Y chromosome and still produce males. In most mammals, a gene called SRY on the Y chromosome (sex region y) triggers another gene on another chromosome called SOX9 to start the process of developing into a male. In a couple of spiny rat species from Japan, the y chromosome has disappeared. The males have a duplication mutation near the SOX9 gene that turns it on and the females don't have that mutation. Humans could evolve (or splice in) a similar mutation to keep producing males once we have lost SRY.
CyberneticPanda t1_jbcv80s wrote
Reply to comment by Winstonthewinstonian in Point Lobos State Park, Carmel, CA [OC][4032x3024] by Mrpetasus
Np. The various fungal pathogens that cause tree cankers and other plant diseases are mostly carried around the world by the nursery trade. Plant local grown native plants!
CyberneticPanda t1_jbcmmkj wrote
Reply to comment by Winstonthewinstonian in Point Lobos State Park, Carmel, CA [OC][4032x3024] by Mrpetasus
No the lichens dont hurt the trees. Lots of trees have fungal diseases called x canker. They develop a sore that leaks sap at the infection site.
CyberneticPanda t1_jbc3osw wrote
The trees atop that cliff are Monterey Cypress trees. This stand and another in Pebble Beach are the only two remaining natural stands in the world. It is a Pleistocene relict species that is being pushed into the sea by the changing climate of the past 12k years. There is a fungal disease that affects new world cypresses called cypress canker, caused by Seiridium cardinale. Monterey Cypress are the most vulnerable to it, but the salt spray from the sea protects them from the fungus, so they don't grow that well elsewhere, despite being a popular landscape tree.
All new world cypress trees are beautiful and smell fantastic, but Monterey Cypress is one of the most hauntingly beautiful. Because of its growth on sea cliffs exposed to heavy winds, they are Krummholz trees. Krummholz means they are stunted and twisted by exposure to harsh, salty wind. Combined with the varied lichens and mosses in the grove, it makes hiking through there feel like something from a fantasy movie.
CyberneticPanda t1_jatll1v wrote
Reply to Perspective [Image] by cherrymasterlou
There is a prison on San Francisco Bay that has a giant wall on the bay side so the prisoners don't have a nice view. I think about that a lot.
CyberneticPanda t1_j7bsi0q wrote
Reply to Is the yearly cycle of varying daylight durations from day to day throughout time consistent? Is the cycle we have today the same as in the 17th century? by meellowstar
It is very very close to consistent, but days are very slowly getting longer. Thanks to tidal interactions, the moon steals a little of Earth's angular momentum every year and gets a little further away. That makes the day a tiny bit longer and the tilt of the orbit a tiny bit bigger. At the start of the Triassic 252 million years ago, there were about 400 days per year, and the moon was about 6000 miles closer.
CyberneticPanda t1_j7br2z1 wrote
Reply to [OC] Florida swamps north of Daytona. The goal was to get perfect star reflections, and that didn't happen, but it might still be cool... 4912 × 6140 by theeternalpanda
That is Orion right above the palm tree. The 3 stars in a row are his belt and the stars forming a line to the right of it is his sword. The sword has the Orion nebula in it which is a stellar nursery about 5000 light years away and the only stellar nursery visible with the naked eye.
CyberneticPanda t1_j6gm8w7 wrote
Reply to comment by Roobar76 in Eli5....can you dig a well anywhere and hit water...and how did the early ranchers in the West know where to dig for water. Especially in the really dry areas? by pinkshrinkrn
Not really true. In the 19th century people in Congress believe that" rain followed the plow" and God would bring rain to the west if people turned it into farms. They let people homestead places like Arizona and it went terribly for the homesteaders. Later they spent lots of money on water projects to bring water to the places that needed it. But by that time the holdings have been consolidated and the homesteaders who survived had sold their holdings for next to nothing.
CyberneticPanda t1_j6gm2rf wrote
Reply to comment by fox-mcleod in Eli5....can you dig a well anywhere and hit water...and how did the early ranchers in the West know where to dig for water. Especially in the really dry areas? by pinkshrinkrn
Nobody wants a salt water well.
CyberneticPanda t1_j6glvc2 wrote
Reply to comment by milkytrizzle93 in Eli5....can you dig a well anywhere and hit water...and how did the early ranchers in the West know where to dig for water. Especially in the really dry areas? by pinkshrinkrn
The guy you are responding to is joking, but the whole planet is kind of made of water with land floating on it. It's not just water though; it's rock that is saturated with water. There is a lot of water in the crust, then the upper mantle is pretty dry, but 400 km deep there is a lot of water, possibly more than in all the oceans combined. It's the boundary between the outer mantle and the inner mantle. That transition zone is about 7% of the Earth's mass and probably between 1 and 3% of it is water. That puts it at 1.5 to 4.5 times as much water as there is in the crust.
CyberneticPanda t1_j6gk8v9 wrote
Reply to comment by r2k-in-the-vortex in Eli5....can you dig a well anywhere and hit water...and how did the early ranchers in the West know where to dig for water. Especially in the really dry areas? by pinkshrinkrn
There are toooooons of places where you hit bedrock before water. You can dig a well anywhere and get to water but it's not economical to do it in places that you have to drill through hundreds of feet of rock.
CyberneticPanda t1_j6aybkr wrote
Reply to comment by Amariel777 in Seeking passage to use for Eulogy from Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy. by cavillchallenger
I feel like you have to close with "So long, and thanks for all the fish."
CyberneticPanda t1_j6aoby2 wrote
Those are some awfully short cutoffs your dad is rocking.
CyberneticPanda t1_j68vu8d wrote
Reply to comment by CrustalTrudger in can gemstones be melted into a gradient? by Acceptable_Shift_247
Most gem quality rubies and sapphires come from metamorphic rock with igneous intrusions, so you would be real unlikely to be able to get big clean crystals this way. On top of that, you can't really get them out of the metamorphic rock really because you'll break them with the surrounding rock. We mostly get them from sedimentary deposits (placer deposits) when the softer rock around them weathers away and the hard gemstones get picked up by water and moved downstream.
CyberneticPanda t1_j5zjimm wrote
Reply to comment by codesnik in Mycotecture — the use of mushrooms and other fungal substances for architectural purposes — could be key to building affordable, fire-resistant, insulated habitats on the Moon and Mars. NASA aims to experiment with the technique on the Moon in 2025. by clayt6
The first ones will probably be set up at the south pole with solar panels on the rims of craters that get sunlight all year except during a lunar eclipse, but there are stable orbits at Lagrange points. Since the moon has no atmosphere microwave power transmission would be pretty effective.
CyberneticPanda t1_j5x1f5l wrote
Reply to comment by KenethSargatanas in Mycotecture — the use of mushrooms and other fungal substances for architectural purposes — could be key to building affordable, fire-resistant, insulated habitats on the Moon and Mars. NASA aims to experiment with the technique on the Moon in 2025. by clayt6
It doesn't have much hydrogen which you need to make water and hydrocarbons.
CyberneticPanda t1_j5x135t wrote
Reply to comment by The_Solar_Oracle in Mycotecture — the use of mushrooms and other fungal substances for architectural purposes — could be key to building affordable, fire-resistant, insulated habitats on the Moon and Mars. NASA aims to experiment with the technique on the Moon in 2025. by clayt6
With it's low gravity and lack of atmosphere, the moon screams for orbital solar.
CyberneticPanda t1_j5vebd1 wrote
Reply to A cheese bush by Ezristovall
It smells a little like cheese. This is native to California deserts, but there is another non-native moderately invasive plant called cheese weed. That one can be cooked like okra and the fruits are these little nutty-flavored things that look like wheels of cheese, which is where the name comes from. The fruits are good on salads.
CyberneticPanda t1_j4yjpr9 wrote
Reply to [Homemade] Milk Bread by NightsWatch23
This would go great with milk steak.
CyberneticPanda t1_j48ah6q wrote
Reply to How do we know that dark matter isn't just ordinary matter our instruments can't detect? by jmite
One of the ways we know is that we have detected galaxies that underwent a normal matter interaction that caused the normal matter to be displaced from the dark matter like this one. The collision of 2 galaxies exerted gravitational forces on both regular and dark matter, but other forces on just the normal matter make it get displaced from the dark matter.
CyberneticPanda t1_j26ilwq wrote
Reply to comment by Aseyhe in How does light factor into gravity models? by littleboymark
The CMB is light that was emitted, but not until about 380k years after the big bang. Before that matter was so dense in the universe that any light that was emitted was reabsorbed by other matter. There were also other elementary particles in the early universe ~1 second after the big bang like quarks and electrons. By 3 minutes after the big bang, quarks we're forming neutrons and protons. Around 24k years after the big bang, there was more matter than energy in the universe. At 380k years after the big bang, things had cooled Enough for electrons to get captured by hydrogen and helium nuclei, throwing off photons that we still see some of today, the CMB. The CMB doesn't dominate the energy in the universe. It's about 10 orders of magnitude lower than the average matter/energy density of the universe.
CyberneticPanda t1_j22oxvw wrote
Reply to comment by Numerous-Afternoon89 in [OC] The Number of Endangered Species in Each US State by malxredleader
-
A lot. California has more biodiversity than the northeast US and Canada combined. Texas scores so high because they have a lot of rivers with endangered species. Deserts have a lot of biodiversity actually. Generally speaking, the closer you get to the equator the more biodiversity you have, and the zone where we get deserts is mostly between 30 and 50 degrees north and south.
-
None. California has it's own law and a species that is protected under it is called "a species of special interest to the state of California." The Endangered Species Act is federal law. There is also an international organization called IUCN that designates species as endangered.
CyberneticPanda t1_jcl9ykw wrote
Reply to Let There Be Light, Norway[OC][1080x809] by justerikfotos
Some snow hare in that sunbeam just became the Main Character.