CRMagic

CRMagic t1_j8oatsd wrote

This is absolutely untrue. We have had an issue before where a doctor from Missouri Eye Institute in town wanted to refer my wife to STL or KC, and stated no one in town would work. We looked around and found a specialist at Mercy, went to him for a second opinion. He spotted the issue immediately and had her back to normal in two weeks.

Whether the first doctor was incompetent or malicious makes no difference; check around here first because they absolutely do not have to refer you in town.

−23

CRMagic t1_iyjc3i9 wrote

Now the actual issue is "my doc agreed to rewrite my prescription but didn't and thinks I'm denying being depressed". Those are different issues than BMI, and the first one is a priori to me: I don't want a doctor who doesn't listen if I say something didn't work. BMI doesn't even factor in there.

If it's just one of your new criteria is also "and doesn't use BMI", well, circle back to my top level comment. Good luck!

0

CRMagic t1_iyjadi0 wrote

No one argued otherwise. The BMI is a tool, one that works in most cases, and has some known outliers, like just about any other tool used to determine things in medicine. Wholesale rejection of it because it doesn't work in your case is illogical. And your doc doesn't seem to be basing advice to you on it based on other comments in this thread, which sounds to me like you already have what you want.

0

CRMagic t1_iyj57jp wrote

There are a few categories of people where the BMI doesn't correlate well with the actual body fat content. Really roughly, it's young adults, women, and bodybuilders.

Any doctor worth their salt should already know about those and be explaining to you why they are concerned in spite of that, if they even are. Otherwise, you're complaining about docs using a pretty robust indicator for health problems that works for the vast majority of the population.

I seriously doubt you will find a competent family practitioner who completely disregards BMI.

5