I've had a great experience at Holistic Heart. They are fully remote now and a little on the "crunchy" side but the sessions are normal.

Its only you pigs that can just beat their spouse into sticking around.

Nothing I've said disagrees with that, I just care that I'm not trying to make things happen based on bad information.

You do understand why a stranger linking unsourced information on the internet is not reliable, right?

I'm not the one making the claim so I have no responsibility to verify it. You have the burden of proof. You have provided someone else's analysis copied from a site with no links to the source data.

In this thread you have already said there was no confirmed genetic % and then immediately linked an 80% figure (also without a source) so you have not swayed me in any way nor given me any reason to trust what your saying.

Always want a link to the actual study. A copy paste from what I'm sure is a biased advocacy group is useless.

That seems an awful lot like a list from a group you're copying from. Do you have links to the actual studies or just a list of someone's interpretations?

Its not a poll if you're just leading people to an answer without all the info.

Do you have peer reviewed sources for any of the claims you have made?

The proposed question here assumes the premise is true. There is no definitive evidence and at best some correlation, unless you have a peer reviewed source stating otherwise.

Also incredibly biased wording for the question being asked with no explanation for a "no" response clearly trying to lead people to vote yes.

Im not very far away and I very rarely hear anything

I love the idea of a compassionate man who balls up his fists for a punch every time he talks and is in charge of the enforcement class. Awesome.

Great job Globe, sure needed this pro cop puff piece.

It feels like climate change and using a metal straw. Sure you can make improvements, but when 98% of all emissions are corporate, making small changes is putting the onus on the home owner instead of predatory rate hikes and 2 types of delivery charges.

The bills high because they're charging a fucking ton for it and there was a rate hike. I highly doubt suddenly people who have lived in a cold state don't understand using more this month means a higher bill than last.

I used them but didnt pay since it was through my insurance. Great service though.

Got one at Best Buy yesterday as well.

Truth has like 15 total users. Even if every single one of them said something its not indicative of anything at all.

edit: Fox cut away from trumps announcement to show something biden was saying. It is not the same thing as 2016.

not anymore. Go to r/conservative. Theyre abandoning him in droves. The best case scenario is for him to win/run/lose or lose primary, but run as an independant and take Desantis out of the running with a split ticket.

My last response will be to let you know, you election deniers are a national embarrassment, literally making us the laughing stock of the rest of the world.

What are you even fucking talking about? Is your position Fung was cheated and rightfully won, or are you just mad people didn't vote for him?

I see you are trying to pivot to me being uninformed instead of defending your claim of mail in ballots being fraud. I wont be playing that game.

Who's "ya'll"? Kalus and Fung offered nothing outside of the mainstream GOP bullshit that the state has firmly rejected for years. I can't control people not voting in primaries.

I will take staleness over trying to claim fraud any time my preferred candidate loses. It is embarrassing to yell "You cheated" every time something doesn't go your way.

The whole "get fewer votes" means they lose thing is very confusing to this person.

If people cared about actual change we wouldn't have had a sub 30% primary turn out.

The mail in and provisional ballots are checked against signatures which are captured when getting an ID or registering, which requires one. It's not a work around for refusing to use an ID, just for refusing one at a polling place. I also was a poll worker.

How many people need to tell you no?

You put out into the world "is this fraud" and asked questions with lots of possible explanations but directed the conversation. People are overwhelmingly telling you it's incredibly unlikely it's fraud but you won't get off the hill.

Its still a barrier to entry to solve a problem that almost entirely doesn't exist at an individual voter level.

I'm not interested in arguing why voter ID laws suck.