BadSanna

BadSanna t1_jeff4dz wrote

Yeah, on second thought I don't think these are serious enough crimes that he'd consider fleeing the country and he's enough of a narcissist to think he can beat anything they throw at him.

If it was a murder charge or something that might see him bankrupt and in prison the rest of his life that would be a different story.

If it starts going badly for him I bet you anything he runs for Russia and takes asylum, though.

1

BadSanna t1_jeen0vp wrote

Police can always arrest and detain you if they believe you committed a crime. There is a limit on how long they can hold you this way without an arrest warrant from a judge, though. They have to arraign you as soon as possible in that scenario. Which is why you really don't want to get picked up on a Friday because you coukd end up sitting in a holding cell until Monday and if the holding cells fill up they can book you into jail until your arraignment. Then, even if they take you to court Monday morning, you might sit there all day only for them to never make it to your docket and send you back to where they were holding you until the next day.

People with money and good lawyers will get their docket bumped up the line or even work deals with a judge after hours to get you released on bail or on your own recognizance until your arraignment.

A judge can issue an arrest warrant on their own, but when a grand jury is convened and issues an indictment, the judge presiding over the grand jury will ALWAYS issue an arrest warrant.

I am not a lawyer. This is all information I've picked up from watching police procedurals, true crime and forensic shows/documentaries, and reading about the prison industrial complex.

1

BadSanna t1_jed8i8t wrote

Mostly right. After an indictment a judge issues an arrest warrant and the police arrest the person and book them into jail. That's when the fingerprinting and mugshot take place.

After they're arrested they're arraigned, which is a fancy word for going to court so a judge can hear arguments from both sides to determine if the person should be remanded to jail without bail or if they are trustworthy enough to show up to trial.

At this stage the judge may revoke their passport, put them on house arrest, require them to wear a tracker at all times, or any number of things.

Trump, being extremely wealthy and owning private planes, is more than capable of fleeing the country. I would not be surprised if they revoked his passport, grounded his planes, and put him under house arrest.

I seriously doubt they would deny him bail.

In fact, he may spend no time in jail at all. Maybe a few minutes in a holding cell, as they'll probably take him to be booked at a police station then take him directly to his arraignment where he'll get out on bail.

38

BadSanna t1_j6js7i1 wrote

What? No. The missing piece should be one section.

I'm saying screw through the far joist into a horizontal block perpendicular to and aligned to the top of the far joist in the small bay against the wall. Make that block longer than the width of the hole so you can also screw down through the subfloor into the block at the ends. That will be enough to support the subfloor in the narrow bay against the wall if someone steps there for some unlikely reason.

Then you should also block along the seems in the center bay so the missing piece of plywood has support under the break. Just regular vertical blocks. It's called "boxing out."

You would do the same for like an attic access hatch, so there is support along every seem. You don't need to bother with the one inch gap between the double joist and the next one, that's too small a space to deform even if someone leaned on the exact spot with a cane or something.

5

BadSanna t1_j6jdgmv wrote

No one is going to be walking over there. Just grab a 2x6, cut it longer than the hole, put it in horizontally and screw through the joist then use deck screws through the subfloor on either end. Should be plenty strong enough and easy to remove if you need to access what look like pipes in there.

14

BadSanna t1_j645xqg wrote

This is terrible advice. Most if the time bullies are looking for a reaction. If you give it to them they will keep coming back for more and escalating further and further if you try to ignore it.

What bullies are looking for is fear, embarrassment, shame, impotent rage, and the like. If you give it to them in any form they will never stop.

If you're capable of fighting them and winning, sure, that's a solution. If you're half their size and they can easily destroy you any attempt to fight back is just going to make them laugh and beat you up every day.

The first trick is to never rise to their bait. The second is to show confidence and lack of fear. If you project the idea that you don't want to fight but you're not going to back down from one, either, they will not target you and will usually pick on someone else.

2

BadSanna t1_iujcze7 wrote

He's really good in Requiem for A Dream.

That and the two movies you listed are the only things I've seen where he was any good, though, and his general pretentious douchebaggery on set with his mEtHoD aCtInG means his good roles will continue to be few and far between.

2