00notmyrealname00
00notmyrealname00 t1_j80anwz wrote
Reply to comment by gimmeluvin in FBI conducting search of former Vice President Mike Pence's home by Picture-unrelated
Ever seen Donnie Darko?
I'm expecting a Donnie Darko situation.
00notmyrealname00 t1_j80akob wrote
Reply to comment by TheCrowsSoundNice in FBI conducting search of former Vice President Mike Pence's home by Picture-unrelated
Yo. No doubt that coffin has more inside than a body in gaudy clothing. No. Freakin. Doubt.
00notmyrealname00 t1_j4dq3d6 wrote
Reply to comment by d311h0p in Euston shooting: Girl, 7, and three women injured near church by millajones
Get over yourself. Humor is a completely normal and acceptable way to process tragedy. Displacing your feelings about something onto others is not.
00notmyrealname00 t1_j8iw8y8 wrote
Reply to comment by Lobo_Marvilense in Is it possible that abiogenesis is still happening right now on earth? by dolekanteel
This may be the simplest answer.
We may just not have been able to observe things long enough to make the determination of how the initial event took place. Even if we ran tests in the perfect environment and were able to replicate those tests 1000 times faster, it would take us a million years to see a single success that took a billion years. What if it happens more than just once (say, a thousand times) in that time period? That's still 1000 years to observe success.
It wasn't until the late 19th century that we could even observe cellular division, so at best we've been at it for 150 years. Not to mention that we haven't been looking/testing for it for very long. We may have a long way to go.