Search

38 results for www.iea.org:

grundar t1_jdl1y0i wrote

look at the data:** **First**, [the IEA WEO projects a 20% emissions decline by 2030](https://www.iea.org/data-and-statistics/charts/global-energy-related-co2-emissions-by-scenario-1990-2050). That's using the mid-range scenario ("APS"), since [clean energy progressed much faster than even their ... power generation](https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2021/dec/01/renewable-energy-has-another-record-year-of-growth-says-iea) and [over 100% of additional power generation expected by 2030](https://www.iea.org/reports/world-energy-outlook-2022/outlook-for-electricity), coal use is *highly* likely to decline in the near future (IEA's scenario ... reduction by 2030](https://www.iea.org/reports/world-energy-outlook-2022/outlook-for-solid-fuels)). **Third**, [oil-burning car sales peaked 5 years ago and are in permanent decline](https://bnef.turtl.co/story/evo-2022/page/3/2?teaser=yes). Per their analysis, EVs will become a majority of light vehicle sales

20

grundar t1_j401weq wrote

more quickly than that. In particular, [the IEA WEO projects a 20% emissions decline by 2030](https://www.iea.org/data-and-statistics/charts/global-energy-related-co2-emissions-by-scenario-1990-2050). That's using the mid-range scenario ("APS"), since [clean energy progressed much faster than even ... power generation](https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2021/dec/01/renewable-energy-has-another-record-year-of-growth-says-iea) and [over 100% of additional power generation expected by 2030](https://www.iea.org/reports/world-energy-outlook-2022/outlook-for-electricity). A similar shift has started in ground transportation; [oil-burning car sales peaked 5 years ... light vehicle sales around 2030, resulting in a permanent decline in oil consumption ([peaking around 2024](https://www.iea.org/reports/world-energy-outlook-2022/outlook-for-liquid-fuels) and declining 5-10% by 2030). So, yes, there will be several billion people consuming much

5

civilrunner t1_j58kd14 wrote

Pretty confident these numbers are wrong. https://www.iea.org/fuels-and-technologies/carbon-capture-utilisation-and-storage We're currently capturing about 45 megatons annually. https://www.iea.org/reports/global-energy-review-2021/co2-emissions Meanwhile globally we emit 31.5 gigatons or 31,500 megatons. That means we need

13

grundar t1_ittfxiz wrote

Renewables and EVs prevented about 70% of the CO2 emissions increase](https://www.iea.org/news/defying-expectations-co2-emissions-from-global-fossil-fuel-combustion-are-set-to-grow-in-2022-by-only-a-fraction-of-last-year-s-big-increase): > "The rise in global CO2 emissions this year would be much larger – more than tripling to reach close ... rise of 300Mt will leave energy-related emissions [about 0.7% below their 2018 peak](https://www.iea.org/reports/global-energy-review-2021/co2-emissions), as emissions in 2021 were still 500Mt below 2018's level. There's a reasonable chance that will

8

grundar t1_iugufoq wrote

wind and solar -- [they will be 120% of new electricity added between now and 2030](https://www.iea.org/reports/world-energy-outlook-2022/outlook-for-electricity) -- and is [taking place right now for batteries](https://www.benchmarkminerals.com/membership/lithium-ion-battery-pipeline-breaks-the-6twh-barrier/) and [EVs](https://cleantechnica.com/2022/10/24/china-electric-car-sales-35-share-of-auto-sales-in-september/). That

1

grundar t1_iw04qvh wrote

projected to peak around 2025 ([source](https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2022/oct/27/carbon-emissions-to-peak-in-2025-in-historic-turning-point-says-iea)) and fall 15% by 2030 ([source](https://www.iea.org/data-and-statistics/charts/global-energy-related-co2-emissions-by-scenario-1990-2050)). Those figures would suggest ~33GtC through 2025 + ~51GtC through 2030, or another 84GtC used from the carbon

3

grundar t1_j1a380i wrote

within 3 years](https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2022/oct/27/carbon-emissions-to-peak-in-2025-in-historic-turning-point-says-iea), and [emissions are expected to fall 10-20% by 2030](https://www.iea.org/data-and-statistics/charts/global-energy-related-co2-emissions-by-scenario-1990-2050). Climate change is a hard enough problem without [demoralizing people with doomist hyperbole](https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2021/feb/27/climatologist-michael-e-mann-doomism-climate-crisis-interview).

41

grundar t1_j22hl1p wrote

what will be installed over the period 2022-2027, not just for 2022 ([IEA report](https://www.iea.org/news/renewable-power-s-growth-is-being-turbocharged-as-countries-seek-to-strengthen-energy-security)). However, that's a pretty minor correction, as the phrase the prior comment was complaining about

2

grundar t1_j7gvwks wrote

fucked". In particular, [the IEA expects CO2 emissions to fall 15-20% by 2030](https://www.iea.org/data-and-statistics/charts/global-energy-related-co2-emissions-by-scenario-1990-2050), putting the world roughly in line with the IPCC's SSP1-2.6 pathway which projects an estimated

11

grundar t1_j7hsi7v wrote

also why [the International Energy Agency projects carbon emissions will fall 15-20% by 2030.](https://www.iea.org/data-and-statistics/charts/global-energy-related-co2-emissions-by-scenario-1990-2050) Is that a *morally satisfying* reason for change to occur? No, not really -- it feels weird

18

grundar t1_j7o8ly9 wrote

International Energy Agency projects carbon emissions will fall 15-20% by 2030.](https://www.iea.org/data-and-statistics/charts/global-energy-related-co2-emissions-by-scenario-1990-2050) > > I don't care why it's happening, I do care that it's not happening anywhere near

2

grundar t1_j8qdsbv wrote

SSP5-8.5 scenarios)." By contrast, [the IEA expects CO2 emissions to fall 15-20% by 2030](https://www.iea.org/data-and-statistics/charts/global-energy-related-co2-emissions-by-scenario-1990-2050), putting the world roughly in line with the IPCC's SSP1-2.6 pathway -- a pathway they

2

FuggleyBrew t1_j9aalt1 wrote

period in 2021, driven by a 15% drop in the industrial sector as factories curtailed production.** https://www.iea.org/news/natural-gas-markets-expected-to-remain-tight-into-2023-as-russia-further-reduces-supplies-to-europe By contrast Norway increased, but less than the decrease in demand: >The official gas export

1

DisasterousGiraffe OP t1_jaryg79 wrote

going all-in with BEVs which already have [14% of the global market in 2022](https://www.iea.org/reports/co2-emissions-in-2022). BEV sales are increasing at a conservative estimate of [30% per year](https://old.reddit.com/r/Futurology/comments/10xssw9/gasoline_use_has_peaked_in_usa_6_below_2019_due/j7wayqg/) which means

3

washingtonpost OP t1_jd53gw2 wrote

absolutely right. Any one us don't have an outsize impact on the [36.3 gigatonnes](https://www.iea.org/reports/global-energy-review-co2-emissions-in-2021-2) the world emits each year — except perhaps Kim Kardashian and others flying their private jets

25

grundar t1_jdk6202 wrote

climateactiontracker.org/global/cat-thermometer/). In fact, [IEA projections are for emissions to fall 15-20% by 2030](https://www.iea.org/data-and-statistics/charts/global-energy-related-co2-emissions-by-scenario-1990-2050), putting us [on the second-lowest IPCC pathway]((https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg1/downloads/report/IPCC_AR6_WGI_SPM.pdf)) and in line for an estimated

26

Helkafen1 t1_jebu4dy wrote

minute. - [U.S. Hydrogen Electrolyzer Locations and Capacity](https://www.energy.gov/eere/fuelcells/articles/us-hydrogen-electrolyzer-locations-and-capacity) - [Total installed electrolysis capacity by technology](https://www.iea.org/reports/electrolysers) > There's about 100 GW of already installed capacity. That's 100 GW more capacity

3

grundar t1_jef5cq1 wrote

other developed-world mine. Compared to the [7,500 Mt of coal mined per year](https://www.iea.org/data-and-statistics/charts/global-coal-production-2018-2021) and [4,200 Mt of oil extracted per year](https://www.statista.com/statistics/265229/global-oil-production-in-million-metric-tons), mining [0.1Mt](https://pubs.usgs.gov

2

Kaz_55 t1_jefkxjn wrote

stagnating for the last decades and will play an ever diminishing role in the coming decades: https://www.iea.org/data-and-statistics/charts/installed-power-generation-capacity-by-source-in-the-stated-policies-scenario-2000-2040 Nuclear is a dead-end for terrestial utility scale power generation. Renewables are the only feasible

1

FrozenIceman t1_irxyaxe wrote

industrial solar (I.E. Solar farms, the roof top ones are far less efficient). [https://www.iea.org/reports/projected-costs-of-generating-electricity-2020](https://www.iea.org/reports/projected-costs-of-generating-electricity-2020) On top of that the West put in lots of intentional blockers for Nuclear Development to slow its progress

0