Submitted by DaddyBobMN t3_119x7rv in vermont
you_give_me_coupon t1_j9puja1 wrote
Reply to comment by appa-ate-momo in Senate panel advances major housing bill, overhauling municipal zoning and Act 250 by DaddyBobMN
> We need to stop living in the days gone by where Vermont can be majority single-family homes and wide open spaces
I agree about the single-family homes, but we absolutely must keep the wide-open spaces.
cpujockey t1_j9vi83y wrote
> I agree about the single-family homes
but I hate hearing my neighbors. I like wood working, running CNC machines, and playing my guitar loud. Can't do that in a giant people box.
kellogsmalone t1_ja2u8yv wrote
I mean, you can...you might just need to ensure complaints :)
cpujockey t1_ja2wqqk wrote
Complaints get expensive and end up pissing off land lords. Ain't no way I can risk that in this housing shortage.
you_give_me_coupon t1_j9vstff wrote
I completely agree. I suppose we should be able to make the dense places denser (if people living there want that) without requiring density, or even worse, making wide-open spaces into people boxes.
ceiffhikare t1_j9qkfl1 wrote
There is more than enough land already locked up forever in trusts and preservation deals,lol. Every town could easily add another 5% in new housing and it would hardly change the landscape. Dont worry it will still look pretty for the damn tourists.
you_give_me_coupon t1_j9qsdu5 wrote
The tourists can go fuck themselves, I want it pretty for me and mine.
Vermontess t1_j9qvp12 wrote
FWIW Vermont ranks 25th for public lands In the country
kellogsmalone t1_ja2uaz7 wrote
How is this measured. Percentage of land preserved?
Vermontess t1_ja3d48q wrote
Yup
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments