sudifirjfhfjvicodke t1_ir3h9t9 wrote
Reply to comment by jl_theprofessor in WSJ: Chess Investigation Finds That U.S. Grandmaster ‘Likely Cheated’ More Than 100 Times by neighborhood-chad
Yeah, I don't follow competitive chess at all, so when I first heard about the allegations, I just rolled my eyes and figured Carlsen was just a huge crybaby. But the more I read about this, the more I'm convinced that he knew exactly what he was talking about.
quick20minadventure t1_ir53029 wrote
Magnus is the top most authority on how humans play chess. He is not just gifted, he works insanely hard and he got to the top by being extremely unforgiving and harsh on himself when he made mistakes.
The idea that magnus was being a crybaby was always a joke for people familiar. And he's completely justified in drawing a line and saying he'll not play against people who cheated online or offline repeatedly.
His response and chess.com report are both extremely nuanced and very professional. People just got impatient.
[deleted] t1_ir6jwh2 wrote
[removed]
jorge1209 t1_ir52fy4 wrote
Carlsen may have had insider information from chess.com due to a financial transaction between his chess website and chess.com.
I don't know the terms of that deal or if it was all cash or had some stock involved.
Audityne t1_ir59ish wrote
He had no such information. It says so in the article.
NukaCooler t1_ir7alwj wrote
Reading? I don't visit Reddit to read.
phoenixmusicman t1_ir871vm wrote
I don't visit to reddit to read, only read. I choose 3.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments