Submitted by jarvedttudd t3_zvvjh2 in space
sigmund14 t1_j1t0dbk wrote
Reply to comment by SuddenlyLucid in Meet the amateur astronomer who found a lost NASA satellite by jarvedttudd
I wish everyone would do the same as NASA. It wouldn't really be profitable, but the brand loyalty would be through the roof.
Instead, we have planned obsolescence - deliberate failure of some component that is impossible to replace / repair. Creating trash just for profits.
ballrus_walsack t1_j1t3uuy wrote
I always buy NASA branded electronics.
iaredavid t1_j1tbmz0 wrote
Tempurpedic! Freeze dried ice cream!
Baremegigjen t1_j1th2n2 wrote
Velcro. In fact it’s the primary method for attaching the reflective blanket that protects the bus (body) of satellites.
iaredavid t1_j1ww9je wrote
Unfortunately, Velcro's European, but aerospace is definitely the reason we all know about it.
Lochcelious t1_j1t9ylx wrote
This is a thing?
danielv123 t1_j1u2k2e wrote
Sure, you can get them from AliExpress.
kinboyatuwo t1_j1u8shf wrote
Or just ensure stuff is serviceable. I would take that.
I had a vacuum a few years ago and the brush head failed at the bearing and tore it and the plastic connector apart.
I couldn’t find a replacement head (had ordered 3 that were listed as correct and none fit) and the plastic part I had to “make” by filling with epoxy and using a dremmel to make the recess.
3D printing helps, we just need better ways to get the shapes into the system now. But we need a requirement for a parts availability for day 10 years or the company has to give you a new one.
MeagoDK t1_j1uba36 wrote
Sometimes the replacement cost as much as a new machine. Had to replace the rack in my dishwasher (it was rusten) ended up buying a new dishwasher as it was not that much more.
kinboyatuwo t1_j1unwls wrote
Ya it’s crazy. We need more supply chain but also salvage. I’ll bet someone not far away had a failed one and tossed it that had a rack that was fine.
Only way it will happen is legislation sadly.
I would pay extra to know parts are available ans affordable for 20y.
MeagoDK t1_j1uvbld wrote
Yup a thing they would improve it would be to have very standard hardware interfaces. If a rack would always fit then you can easily start saving used but good racks when someone throws out a rack and it would be much to find the broken part.
kinboyatuwo t1_j1uxn6x wrote
Shoot, they even make changes in their own line up and year to year. You would think some consistency would lower costs for them but someone has done the math I suspect.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments