Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

Defiant-Taro4522 t1_j5fd8ll wrote

Could the reason for this be that shared household usually means shared economy, and shared diet? When I'm visiting my parents I eat like them. When I'm eating out with friends we tend to find a compromise.

221

PanickedPoodle t1_j5fhovl wrote

That's been the previous theory. We tend to want to blame people for their health issues.

This is a new take that says perhaps the habits arise from the bacteria. We know bacteria are in a daily battle, putting out chemicals to kill each other. Those chemicals influence the human brain.

We are a colony animal.

90

Defiant-Taro4522 t1_j5fjndl wrote

I've seen nothing that indicates humans are slaves under their bacteria. Rather, the bacteria seem to influence our behaviour. But, like peer pressure, we can decide to go against their influence.

I don't think we should blame people for their health issues, but I also think we should be careful to absolve them from any and all responsibility. In the end, we're the captains of our ships.

27
16

[deleted] t1_j5g096b wrote

[deleted]

−1

deadfisher t1_j5gqxpi wrote

The commenter you replied to said bacteria "influences" the brain, and provided a source to that effect. I don't know where you got the idea that anybody - but you - said anything about completely controlling the brain.

27

pugmastaflex t1_j5h2ekl wrote

The commenter implied otherwise by introducing “blame”. If my bacteria pressure me and I listen to them as opposed to exert my sentient willpower, then I am still to blame. Suggesting otherwise means I no longer have control, which is what the responder derived. I think maybe there was just a completely understandable miscommunication between these two and nobody is hurling insults. Gut microbiome absolutely influences our cravings, which is why stool transplants from healthy individuals can sometimes work to change the eating habits of someone obese.

It’s all super interesting!

−1

Defiant-Taro4522 t1_j5h51a6 wrote

>The commenter implied otherwise by introducing “blame”. If my bacteria pressure me and I listen to them as opposed to exert my sentient willpower, then I am still to blame. Suggesting otherwise means I no longer have control, which is what the responder derived.

Yes, that's how I saw it. I also see now that I misunderstood what the other person was trying to communicate.

4

PanickedPoodle t1_j5g0tuu wrote

Dude, I gave you one link because you said you had never seen anything on the topic. There are thousands. Go do some research if you're interested in the topic.

I'm not trying to confirm a bias with all this. I just like the science. Continue on with blaming people for their weight or bad health or whatever floats your boat.

24

[deleted] t1_j5g56dj wrote

[deleted]

−3

ShiraCheshire t1_j5gnjpn wrote

No one here ever said humans are slaves to bacteria. When did anyone say that? You're knocking down a strawman you set up yourself. All they said is that bacteria influences the brain.

23

vkashen t1_j5hgy6a wrote

> we decide what we consume

As far as we know now... ;) Scientific determinations are ever changing as more data comes to light.

2

Wallabills t1_j5h5qeb wrote

bacteria aren't battling though?? most microbes produce signaling molecules dependent on their environment and may shift their chemical output dependant on other microbes present. but it's not all out war all the time. it's just a bunch of little organisms excreting chemicals because substrates were available. we do contain colonies though

5

skillywilly56 t1_j5hsprj wrote

Bacteria produce antibiotics as a defense mechanism against neighboring microbes to secure their patch, so it’s a kind of all out chemical war for supremacy because they evolve so quickly.

2

Hippopotasaurus-Rex t1_j5fgryf wrote

That would apply to neighbors too. If you live in a predominately rich white area, with lots of greenery, and open space, your around wildly different things than if you live in a multi family high rise in the middle of the city, with zero green space.

59

Smurf-Sauce t1_j5g1s73 wrote

Indeed! That can happen even if your neighbors are not white, believe it or not.

34

Ok_Skill_1195 t1_j5ge8al wrote

Please show me these highly affluent but predominately non-white neighborhoods across America.

Red lining is part of our history, most nice neighborhoods have consistently stayed veering white & non-white neighborhoods were targeted for less than desirable stuff to go in (like things we know cause environmental pollution), it's not racist to point that out, it's acknowledging our history of systemic racism & the lasting impact of it.

22

peer-reviewed-myopia t1_j5gjb78 wrote

This research specifically investigated person-to-person bacterial strain transmission. Diet is considered more of a factor in the relative composition of our microbiome, not the uniqueness of the bacterial strains that it's composed of. Very few strains in our microbiome can survive for long outside the human body.

Apparently, they tried to correct for food-to-gut transmission by disregarding strains that had any genome-based similarity to what's been found in commercially available food. How effective this correction was is TBD because there's so much unknown regarding microbiome transmission.

As of now, it seems person-to-person strain transmission is distance-based within shared environments. Still, food-to-gut strain transmission could be a factor. Lots more to discover.

26

2planks t1_j5gchuz wrote

I’m thinking water supply plays a large role in this.

8

trancepx t1_j5g0crl wrote

If we admit that there's a proximity effect of unhealthy food sources, then how might we blame something else for our poor diet and lifestyle choices!?

−6

Smurf-Sauce t1_j5g2vp3 wrote

Simply: just because one factor has some effect on our behavior doesn’t mean it’s solely to blame for our behavior.

13