Submitted by FredricTheConqueror t3_zzdkq2 in nyc
Comments
creepy_sweetie t1_j2b43s2 wrote
let’s goooooo
treesareweirdos t1_j2bd8q9 wrote
Very exciting, I wonder if there’s any chance of this passing. My gut would say no, but the way Marijuana legalization spread across the country surprised me, so who knows?
ELONGATEDSNAIL t1_j2bj38e wrote
No way its passing
aviciiavbdeadpunk t1_j2bkemt wrote
of all people to bills passed, it would be rosenthal ( most bills passed i think in the assembly ), reyes is a nurse
brihamedit t1_j2blkn0 wrote
If some big psychedelic assisted therapy clinic lobbied for legalization, then it would pass. Otherwise state/city insiders probably aren't sensible enough to consider the positive implications.
Masses of people need psychedelic assisted therapy. But our system is too primitive to allow it.
keefhernandz t1_j2bm87j wrote
Omg yesss please let this happen, even though the process would be long and tedious and probaly very restrictive. There is quite a bit of mid to lowgrade stuff on the bm.
GoRangers5 t1_j2bqz07 wrote
This is Brave New World shit, dope us the fuck up so we’re apathetic.
GoRangers5 t1_j2bsbt9 wrote
Getting high is not therapy.
SkankinHank t1_j2bur83 wrote
Lol, exactly what you would expect to hear from someone who has neither personally experienced nor researched the positive effects of psychedelic use. Sure, it's not a panacea, but it's a different ballgame entirely from opiates or even weed. I can't imagine a scenario where someone comes out the other side of a psychedelic experience more pathetic than when they went into it.
sbb214 t1_j2bv6zp wrote
Mt Sinai is a leading research hospital for MDMA and other psychedelic therapies
[deleted] t1_j2bwov7 wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j2bwwmy wrote
[removed]
GoRangers5 t1_j2bwzs9 wrote
Science doesn't care what you can imagine, people have fallen into permanent psychosis from psychedelic experiences.
theelljar t1_j2c01li wrote
yes please
theelljar t1_j2c07z1 wrote
sign me up
vegeta1418 t1_j2c0bty wrote
Have you ever used them
GoRangers5 t1_j2c0r1j wrote
Amphiscian t1_j2c2yer wrote
Wait till this guy finds out what alcohol does to people
[deleted] t1_j2c3w89 wrote
[removed]
GoRangers5 t1_j2c5b1u wrote
Nobody claims alcohol isn’t dangerous.
PhillyFreezer_ t1_j2c5c19 wrote
Correct, but psychedelic assisted therapy is!
PhillyFreezer_ t1_j2c5e2i wrote
Oh yeah, a huge side effect of magic mushrooms is apathy. Totally true
GoRangers5 t1_j2c5lym wrote
What’s the difference between paying and dealer and having a friend watch you and paying a therapist to watch you? Honestly asking in good faith, I don’t see a difference.
PhillyFreezer_ t1_j2c61s4 wrote
Because you’re not “paying a therapist to watch you” lol just Google it dude
Unable-Ad3852 t1_j2c6vss wrote
Or a viking berserker. Imagine hopping at the wheel and thinking you're Maxx damage in Carmagedon.
ctindel t1_j2ca0kr wrote
If we didn’t let lawmakers control everything and instead had referendum options like CA and CO this would definitely happen here.
CactusBoyScout t1_j2cm4q0 wrote
Yeah but then you also end up with stupid shit like Prop 65’s meaningless cancer warnings on every product.
TetraCubane t1_j2cmf1g wrote
I mean if you assume that all Democrats will vote yes on this, it should pass.
Pool_Shark t1_j2cnk0z wrote
Yeah but then Hochul would veto it
Pristine-Confection3 t1_j2co16m wrote
I don’t get why . When I take weed I get paranoid and have panic attacks but take mushrooms very well . I don’t understand why weed Is legal but psychedelics are not.
ctindel t1_j2co326 wrote
I don’t care about that the referendum have done far more good than harm. Keeping people from getting priced out of their home when property values rise, legalizing weed and mushrooms, giving tax payers a bill of rights so they can vote on whether they want to pay more taxes or not and get a refund of the tax estimates were too high.
Let us recall some corrupt motherfuckers while we’re at it. I’m all for a much more direct democracy especially on the most important questions of the day. Let the bureaucrats manage the bullshit that nobody wants to talk or think about.
Pristine-Confection3 t1_j2co6br wrote
And then nobody would be able to afford it and it wouldn’t be covered by insurance. They will it where it isn’t accessible to all as they do with ketamine therapy .
Pristine-Confection3 t1_j2co8vw wrote
A therapist isn’t the same as a trip sitter .
CactusBoyScout t1_j2coa9o wrote
Prop 13 was incredibly bad for California’s housing market. And it just caused cities/counties to raise taxes in other ways so it became a regressive subsidy for homeowners who are wealthier than those who do not own.
Pristine-Confection3 t1_j2coj1d wrote
Oddly , Huxley the writer of “ Brave New Wold “ also wrote and entire book on the psychedelic mescaline . It isn’t even a good argument source
Also, psychedelics don’t do that at all. If anything they amplify emotions and you feel so much more . They are not comparable to opioids. Funny how you cite the works of a man who thought highly is psychedelics. You have clearly not done your research
[deleted] t1_j2cr25g wrote
[removed]
GoRangers5 t1_j2ctnrx wrote
He was an addict, it’s a warning, that’s what “soma” is in the book, man was so addicted to acid he asked for it on his deathbed.
Pristine-Confection3 t1_j2cujsc wrote
The book was written before he took psychedelics. It wasn’t at all what soma was about . It doesn’t mean addiction to enjoy the last minutes of life on a substance and LSD isn’t really physically addictive. It can be psychologically but not physically.
You really won’t win an argument about this since I have done extensive research on psychedelics but you haven’t even tried them if you are comparing likely dissociative drugs in a book to LSD . It seemed more like big Pham drugs anyway .
NewIndependent5228 t1_j2dacad wrote
Do you happen to know how to participate in the study?
MisterFatt t1_j2dhgc2 wrote
They’ve also fallen into psychosis from nothing at all
Now let’s list all of the statically negligible (and not) dangers of legal things like alcohol or sugar
GoRangers5 t1_j2dmgtf wrote
Nobody is claiming alcohol and sugar are good for you.
ZenWarrior7 t1_j2dox17 wrote
Asking for a friend?
ctindel t1_j2dozjp wrote
Just because someone has wealth in a house doesn’t mean they can afford increased property taxes. Taxing income and cap gains is the only thing you know people can actually afford. Though I’d have no problem with property taxing stock portfolios of millionaires because at least we know you can sell some stock to pay the tax without going homeless.
CactusBoyScout t1_j2dp5xb wrote
Prop 13 doesn’t have any means testing though. And it isn’t even limited to a single primary residence. So landlords with a dozen rental properties and even golf courses in Malibu are paying next to no property tax.
ctindel t1_j2dpb6k wrote
Yeah I agree it could use some reform and I’d have no problem limiting it to primary residence and also any rentals that are used as someone else’s primary residence.
I_Cut_Shoes t1_j2dt6zr wrote
Damn you really came out here and argued that the thing responsible for California's housing crisis is good. Maybe it's a good thing we don't do referendums.
ctindel t1_j2dtgq1 wrote
Prop 13 is not responsible for a housing crisis, californias stupid anti growth zoning regulations are responsible. The state even failed to force cities to allow more dense development near transit.
I_Cut_Shoes t1_j2ducw1 wrote
ctindel t1_j2dut9g wrote
tictac_93 t1_j2dvyon wrote
Having a therapist who knows what they're doing help you unpack some trauma safely and thoroughly, vs your friend who may try to do the same but lacks the experience and training (or maybe is just smoking weed and chilling). Not to mention, in a clinical setting they may be able to give you something if the experience becomes overwhelming.
GoRangers5 t1_j2dxcfh wrote
Ok, fair enough, thank you for taking the time to answer instead of being dismissive, whatever it takes to heal.
CactusBoyScout t1_j2dyixf wrote
They’re both pretty big factors. Prop 13 strongly disincentivizes seniors from selling their family homes after their kids leave the house, for one thing.
It’s pretty normal in other housing markets for retirees to move to smaller housing when their kids are grown. The family home then becomes a home for a young family. So instead CA has a ton of older folks in massive houses because they’d actually pay more to move somewhere smaller.
Also if we loosened zoning you’d still have a ton of older people refusing to sell for redevelopment because their property taxes are capped at a few hundred dollars per year. So again it interferes with a lot of housing cycles.
tictac_93 t1_j2dz6v2 wrote
Of course, np
igon86 t1_j2e2j8e wrote
I thought it was limited to the primary residence. That is wild.
CactusBoyScout t1_j2e3md9 wrote
Until fairly recently, you could even pass it on to your kids.
It was basically rent control for landlords and created a landed elite who paid very little into state coffers.
But it was sold with progressive framing like “save grandma’s house” and some people still believe that to this day.
ctindel t1_j2e5ork wrote
Society doesn’t need to be built assuming old people will downsize plenty of people want to live in their house forever (and that’s fine) or pass the house on to their children (and that’s also fine) and it sure as shit shouldn’t tax them to the point where they have to sell their family house.
I’d have no problem with a law that allowed people over 55 to keep their old property tax payment if they sell a primary residence and move to a smaller residence that would have a higher tax burden. But I don’t think it would make as big of a difference as you think it will, but who knows until we try.
Anyway if there’s anything society should be subsidizing it’s helping middle class families and old people become and stay home owners. In a world where housing prices are going up because giant corporations and REITs are just starting to move into SFH as investments this should be on the top 5 of government priorities.
MisterFatt t1_j2e60xk wrote
No but you’re arguing that psychedelics should be illegal because they’re potentially not good for you (which is not really true anyway).
Just because you aren’t explicitly saying other things are good for you, doesn’t mean you’re not being totally inconsistent in your reasoning for why psychedelics should be illegal. Unless of course you think that everything that could have a potential harm should be illegal.
GoRangers5 t1_j2e6hgy wrote
Where did I say they should not be legal? By all means they should, everyone has a right to bodily autonomy barring it doesn’t hurt anyone else. I am against saying they are magic beans with zero risk because that’s factually incorrect.
Danimal_House t1_j2eax7f wrote
CA should never be the model on how to conduct a legislature/implement laws
[deleted] t1_j2ei25c wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_j2etkbz wrote
[removed]
Danimal_House t1_j2ewwkr wrote
It’s okay to admit you weren’t fully aware of what you were talking about man. You don’t need to backtrack and move the goalposts. Just go “Ah shit. Okay well yes that sucks, California seems to be a bit insane when it comes to these prop laws, but it would be nice if we could do it even better then they are.”
ctindel t1_j2ey0ji wrote
It’s not moving the goalposts I said up front I’d be fine with amending it. Every law has unintentional side effects and very rarely is the solution to throw the law out, you just change it to minimize the side effects while keeping the main benefits. Every once in a while you run into something so dumb like the 18th amendment or making abortion illegal where the solution is a 180 degree reversal but usually you just fix the problem with small changes.
ctindel t1_j2ey9gp wrote
Yeah it’s only the 4 largest economy in the world they must have gotten there through bad governance and incompetence.
Danimal_House t1_j2f55ql wrote
Sigh. I mean you can keep digging this whole you’ve made for yourself, or just be a normal person and admit what pretty much any legal professional would agree: California’s laws/systems are not something to be modeled after. Up to you
None of that has anything to do with why their economy is strong. But again, if you feel like making it painfully obvious you don’t understand that and that you’re Not Mad, go for it. You’re crushing it bro.
Hoser117 t1_j2ffa1e wrote
Ironically you'll find lots of people saying the government shut down psychedelics in the first place because they were terrified of the anti-establishment mode of thought it put so many people into.
GoRangers5 t1_j2ffqt6 wrote
Haha, well those boomers are in charge now and I'm skeptical anyone does anything out of altruism.
Die-Nacht t1_j2fq96k wrote
Pretty sure the "drugs" in Brave New World was a metaphor for modern comforts. We let our government get away with so much because, at the end of the day, we're pretty comfortable with all of our modern stuff.
ctindel t1_j2fr09u wrote
Sure, right. The inability for California to price people out of houses they own by cranking their property tax payments to unaffordable levels is absolutely a terrible thing that California should reverse right away and definitely no other state should implement such a wildly popular program to help the middle class and elderly.
DrewZeiss t1_j2b2l86 wrote
Let's goo I'm so excited for this!!