Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

PM_ur_Rump t1_j4s13xm wrote

"Crazy person does crazy thing for attention, negates real struggles of people everywhere."

More at 6:00, 8:00, and 11:00.

153

Xaero_Hour t1_j4s5p4c wrote

That's not what happened here. It should be, "crazy person goes on crazy person's show hosted on crazy man's network to imitate crazy person doing crazy thing for attention, all joyous participants in negating real struggles of people everywhere."

84

Justbe333 t1_j4wf3uj wrote

There’s nothing crazy about fox news . it’s the number one news channel right now and for a valid reason. because they’re the only ones who actually do news and don’t lie constantly, so is the only place on TV a neutral political person can get the least lies and propaganda. I’m not even a Republican and I would trust them over any other news source on television - that’s not where I go to get my news but the world has flipped upside down in the last decade.

−12

Ban-Circumcision-Now t1_j4wjen8 wrote

If you use the term “News” loosely enough

It’s more of a political commentary than news channel

9

Severe-Cookie693 t1_j4wh0da wrote

They’re only the only one telling the truth if you assume everyone else but them is lying, often in unison.

We are the only ones telling the truth! Trust us, we swear we aren’t lying.

6

Stunning_Regret6123 t1_j4s6wlp wrote

That’s literally all of tv though.

−18

Justbe333 t1_j4whnsn wrote

No fox is the only one that doesn’t lie constantly, they’re pretty judgy and plenty of times get on a high horse about some shit, but they aren’t just making shit up or manipulating something that did happen to make it look like it was something else almost every other station does that I mean literally every single other major news outlet. Try looking up lies Trump tell during his presidency, then look up lies Biden told. I’m not even a republican and that disturbed me. According to taglines of googles results Trump-30000 lies. Biden 0 Which if you follow the news regularly and try to be neutral, you know that ain’t right. I think the people who own all these networks need to be investigated because so many of them just make stuff up and people buy it that’s dangerous. I didn’t realize it was that outta control till this week.

−5

Stunning_Regret6123 t1_j4whsvt wrote

Do we have the same Fox News?

3

Justbe333 t1_j4whx4s wrote

There’s only one, so yeah

3

Stunning_Regret6123 t1_j4wi7tl wrote

We have wildly different experiences watching the same channel then. Reality is funny sometimes.

2

Justbe333 t1_j4wj9ig wrote

That’s why I gave them any credit in the first place is I’ve had a mental block on them for about 20 years anything they say I just don’t wanna hear it cause fuck them I’ll get my news somewhere else. Then I realized how often the other outlets were flat out lying because I pay attention. I would instantly know some of the things they were lying about look up things that would corroborate my memory to make sure and sure is hell they were lying so I started back checking them on anything that they claimed that was outrageous or damning. They mostly just lie. This has not been the case throughout my life, in fact, until about 6 months before Trump became president CNN was mostly honest. You can always trust CNN to be left leaning but fair not liars. I don’t know what the fuck happened but now it’s practically all of them. I still hate Hannity and I don’t care to watch Fox like my parents would I’ll just catch the highlights but when I check them for bullshit by digging around, I don’t find lies. Or at least I haven’t found one for quite a while and don’t think for one second that doesn’t pain me to have to admit I used to hate Tucker Carlson_he was a joke on CNN. Now, he’s one of the better journalists alive. Hate having to say it ,but fair is fair.

0

Stunning_Regret6123 t1_j4wkf2b wrote

I kind of like Epoch, but their agenda is really clear in their coverage. Most of Fox is political commentary. When they actually do journalism, they’re not the worst, but literally no one anymore is clear on where the lines in their content are.

I respect the journey you’ve been on with them. Kudos to you for paying attention, checking sources and verifying information.

Edit: I love how pointing out things like in Capitalist America, to modern news outlets YOU are the product they are selling gets you down votes. I never understood the Cynic philosophers until Reddit. I owe you all for that, so I am grateful.

−3

DraziBlack t1_j4s996g wrote

Menzies told Carlson he had been "banned for life" from appearing at the future Halton District School Board meetings for apparently "asking impolite questions."

A Rebel "news" "journalist" getting banned from a highschool is pretty funny.

132

VANILLAGORILLA1986 t1_j4tkrxe wrote

I went to that high school in Oakville…. Man my shop teacher sure has changed over the past 20 years…

28

Justbe333 t1_j4weczm wrote

He’s one of the last journalists left on television, which is hilarious to me because 20 years ago I thought it was a pernicious little twit. Thank God I’ve gotten smarter every year since then.

−23

logan2043099 t1_j4wtnza wrote

It kinda seems like you've gotten dumber actually.

19

Justbe333 t1_j4wy6lp wrote

Dunning-Kruger in full effect…. Don’t worry, you’ll probably outgrow it.
To think you know anything about my level of intelligence based off two or three posts on a website is pretty stupid even for stupid .
I didn’t say I’m a fucking genius or that I’m smarter than everyone else but I’m smart enough to know that for all i know , which is alot, that I still don’t know shit. And there will always be more to know. Least I stay on top of it, which is more than I can say for most people i come across. I question things that I am sure I know and question myself constantly. Learned it from my mentor George Carlin. question everything

−16

logan2043099 t1_j4wygr3 wrote

If George Carlin was your mentor and you ended up believing Fox News is the source of truth then you should go back and rewatch all his material because buddy you missed some things.

18

Justbe333 t1_j4x5rce wrote

I didn’t say it was the source of all truth I said it was the only major news outlet on television that is any source of truth and I rewatch his material about every three weeks for 25 years,thank you.
I still don’t trust everything fox has to say I didn’t say everything they say, is true, or that they were the only ones at all who told the truth, but they are the only MSM that seemingly tells the truth only because I have not been able to debunk them on anything that needed to be examined or was arguably. Bear in mind I don’t have television I don’t sit there with Fox News on all day watching Fox News. These are just the times that I go online when major shit happens and people are bitching about it to see what’s up. All the in between times couldn’t tell ya, but when it has come to things, people are invested in they have a good track record with me this decade in 2000 I couldn’t stand them and I hated Bill O’Reilly with a passion.

−10

soldforaspaceship t1_j4xa0kp wrote

Fox News as a source of truth. The same Fox News that had to defend itself in court using the defence no one rational would think it was any other other than entertainment? The same Fox News currently in court for defamation for, checks notes, lies?

12

Justbe333 t1_j4xa3r5 wrote

Gotta love the projection… That was CNN with Rachel Maddow you stupid fucker

−1

soldforaspaceship t1_j4xdkdi wrote

Here's another one just in case you are as stupid as you seem.

https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/dominion-uses-fox-news-ceo-163323355.html

13

Justbe333 t1_j4xejrx wrote

I’ll read it in a little while I tapped it, I’ll get back. I’m so pissed right now I need to go destroy something. I don’t have high hopes for the credibility though it’s from the dailybeast, I remember them from the Johnny Depp amber heard trial… and what part of every other MSM was i unclear about lying constantly? Tbc

1

soldforaspaceship t1_j4xyico wrote

Dude. You're so pissed right now you need to go destroy something? That's not healthy. Please talk to someone. Joking aside, that's not great.

10

Justbe333 t1_j6nyphi wrote

In case you’re too stupid, I should point out to you… people lie. You should consider all sources before determining your facts. Just so’z you don’t be a dumb ass or a sheep.

0

soldforaspaceship t1_j4xd4gp wrote

12

Justbe333 t1_j6n2zgv wrote

Yes, actually I’m sure. And that’s actually not with the court said… in fact, I’m pretty sure the courts said the same thing in both cases, the court ruled that his statement in question would be considered opinion and not fact not that everything he says is opinion, and not fact. But that a reasonable person would not assume a hyperbolic statement was 100% fact.

https://greenwald.substack.com/p/a-court-ruled-rachel-maddows-viewers

1

davefanri t1_j4sc7r8 wrote

Please don't click the link. FoxNews.com writing a gotcha article about a crazy (totally planned) thing that happened on their Whack Ass channel to get the paid impressions on their site.... infuriating.

110

Buck_Thorn t1_j4rzihs wrote

Plot twist... the guest didn't wear anything out of the ordinary for him.

103

rood_sandstorm t1_j4t5vck wrote

He’s been waiting years for the opportunity to wear it on tv

10

pulseout t1_j4wtju8 wrote

Those giant fake breasts cost at least $300, you don't usually drop that kind of money on a joke you're only going to use once

0

niko4ever t1_j4zhx7u wrote

Pretty sure you can get cheap ones for like $50 if you get bad quality foam booba

1

pulseout t1_j4zyig8 wrote

Maybe, but look closely at his neck, that's silicone

1

ADDandKinky t1_j4tgyih wrote

Dressing in drag to own the libs?

84

marionetted t1_j4ugzsc wrote

Yeah tucker, I'm just gonna suck this dick right here to show you how much I dislike gay marriage.

66

mazu74 t1_j4w61yn wrote

Turns out doing that with malicious intent leads to consequences, who woulda thought?

2

Justbe333 t1_j4wem3d wrote

Parade around like a weird fuck ,get ridiculed . Gee whiz who would’ve thunk it

2

omally_360 t1_j4vplqm wrote

I think he was showing how ridiculous it actually looked. Which it did.

1

OldHat1991 t1_j4z3oie wrote

Trying to bring attention to someone wearing sexual fetish gear and taking advantage of the gender double standard.

0

Bayoffun t1_j4sjy20 wrote

It is an embarrassment for Canada. How this is allowed is beyond ridiculous. I'm for gay, trans, whoever's rights but this weirdo should be fired. If a student dressed like this I'm sure it would be dealt with. SMH.

33

Any_Monitor5224 t1_j4uhjdo wrote

I am a woman with large breasts. No way I could walk around braless in a tight shirt as a teacher without someone saying something to me. I have zero issue with trans folks, but this crosses a line that we hold for all people.

19

adrianmakedonski t1_j4vsv3y wrote

Agreed. And I'm a trans woman with large breasts.

4

Justbe333 t1_j4wgfks wrote

As long as you’re not indoctrinating children and just being yourself, I have no problem with that. Gender dysphoria is a real thing, but a lot of “trans”Aa People don’t have it. Yet get a pass and all the praise and defense in the world —-like that guy who is basically just mocking women. That’s what a lot of people don’t get when it comes to criticizing some trans people…. It’s not that they are trans or we are all hateful…Shit in life is more complicated than that.

−6

adrianmakedonski t1_j4wj8yw wrote

Define "indoctrinating children". Every time I hear that, people equate it with "telling kids that trans people exist" or "telling kids that it's ok if they're LGBTQ".

10

Justbe333 t1_j4wmg55 wrote

They don’t need to know that. I’m not saying it because I’m trying to deny that the existence of LGBTQ people or trans people they’re not your kids. they don’t need to know anything except what they need to know as kids. And the are smart but naive and enormously curious and bold. If they see a trans person or an LGBT couple or whatever out and about they can ask their parents, they have the Internet all of them have cell phones. They can ask other kids and other adults if they’re really curious and don’t accept their parents answer .hell they can look it up most kids now use the internet- i taught myself at 8, then taught my mom. ..if they feel on the inside like they might be like that person, the resources are out there for them to find out and they are not hidden in the least- its everywhere. unless something like that is the case ,they don’t need to know, why do people feel like it’s their place or even important to the child? The child is aware of something that may not affect them whatsoever? It’s not hiding it from them, but kids are influential creatures. They are sponges with infinite imaginations and are constantly finding themselves .they see a spaceman, They want to be a spaceman. They see us dude in a dress(cross dresser, not a trans woman). They want a dress and they want to parade around with feathers like that guy. Which is fine. Hell i used to pretend i was Chun-Li from street fighter and do lunge kicks at my buddy playing e-honda on the trampoline. I did that, naturally, without even being introduced all this stuff, and let them be kids. when ppL start trying to introduce concepts, like ideology identity and all that stuff to kids, then of course they likely will start thinking on that stuff early even before puberty and they don’t need to. It may not be with a malicious intent, but you just programed someone else’s child giving them information that wasn’t your place to give them. They do it on their own in their own timeframe trying to accelerate it in someone else’s child is just wrong. Adults the bad ones and there are a lot of bad ones are aware of how impressionable children are. The world isn’t majorally full of good, honorable and honest people as I’m sure you have observed, it’s quite the opposite. That’s why we tear up when we see a video on YouTube of a kind hearted person stopping someone from hurting themselves or others, by just being human... because it’s actually a rare thing to witness so it touches us. then I see teachers doing videos _saying that they’re talking to their first grade kids about this and they’re not sharing the information or even that they had a discussion with the parents ,they’re hiding it, and that makes me scowl and raise my eyebrow. There are more reasons that are suspect or Not noble in doing that, than good reasons. Namely, because it was the teacher who brought all this crap up in the first place the kids were supposed to be learning their times tables… let’s say it’s not grooming or recruiting at that point then it’s trying to get validation from innocent minds that aren’t going to judge and criticize harshly. That’s not the place of a teacher. That’s not their job. That’s what therapy and group meetings are for. It doesn’t come down to. I don’t want my kid to be that when it comes down to is I don’t want my kid to be that when it wasn’t 100% their own idea. Maybe with some parents it is the first one but far less than it is the other day. I’m sorry for how long as it is I don’t have time to proofread it. My phone is dying I don’t wanna lose it.

−6

NomadicJellyfish t1_j4wt482 wrote

>you just programed someone else’s child giving them information that wasn’t your place to give them

>let’s say it’s not grooming or recruiting at that point then it’s trying to get validation from innocent minds that aren’t going to judge and criticize harshly.

And there it is. Acknowledging the existence of lgbtq people isn't recruiting any more than having a book where a man and a woman kiss is grooming. Either come right out and say you believe being gay is a choice, or admit that hiding the existence of lgbtq people from children is ridiculous.

11

Justbe333 t1_j4wpqqf wrote

Goddamnit just fucking read it and don’t be lazy. I went through all that trouble for a damn good reason.

−7

adrianmakedonski t1_j4wqcc0 wrote

...I did though

11

Justbe333 t1_j4wqm8b wrote

and THATS what you took from it?!

−5

adrianmakedonski t1_j4wr2qj wrote

Yeah. Kids don't become trans because they are made aware of the possibility. I knew I didn't want to be a boy from like age 6. Nobody indoctrinated me, in fact it was quite the opposite from my parents. (You know, parents, the people you're suggesting should teach their kids about this kind of stuff)

19

Justbe333 t1_j4wsasc wrote

Not only are you not qualified to make that claim, nor is there adequate research data to do so regardless ____you’re lying or incorrect. Yes, they absolutely -do. Maybe not all of them you got your kids who are going to go ‘ewww no way’. The ones who will go ‘I look fabulous don’t’ and then you’ve got your kids that OK well ‘I don’t know maybe wouldnt hurt to think about it’ and that’s the ones right there. Those are the kids you would be hitting and don’t you sit there and say it doesn’t happen. if you want to contest that they don’t ….then why don’t you explain what DEtransitioning is all about, because I’ve heard it from a bunch of people who have DEtransitioned, they get exiled from your ‘army of equality’ so maybe you don’t hear from them very often because you’re not looking for them. but I would like to hear your perspective.

−1

adrianmakedonski t1_j4wt6rx wrote

I looked for them for years because I wanted to understand their side. Most of the time, they detransition because of their societal setting. They live in a very conservative area and don't pass as the gender they want to be perceived as, so they get hate every day. They can either leave or detransition and oftentimes, leaving is harder. I feel so bad for those people.

Have you looked up the percentage of detransitioning people? Last I checked it was like less than 1-3% and again, a majority are because of the people around them being shitty.

12

Justbe333 t1_j4wymtl wrote

That is pure nonsense. Why don’t you do some YouTubeing in the wild. You don’t wanna hear my takes on it you won’t listen anyway, so why don’t you hear it from them make it a task this year question one of your own perspective by listening to people in your own clique, or rather who used to be I haven’t come across a single one that said they had to detransition because of their “ conservative” family that sounds like some thing the LGBTQ would claim to further shit on people who don’t go along with every single thing that they say is

−2

adrianmakedonski t1_j4x1j8z wrote

What is nonsense? Can you please show me what you're talking about??

Also, why restrict knowledge in the off chance that 1% of trans people detransition? Of like the 0.5% of humans in general that are trans?

8

Justbe333 t1_j4x5k2m wrote

The bulk of people de transition, because of conservative family, that that is, what’s nonsense
No, .005% of Americans identify as trans. If you want me to be generous .006.

0

adrianmakedonski t1_j4x75z0 wrote

Please please please proofread your comments. They're unintelligible sometimes.

Are you saying that most trans people detransition? Or that most trans people with conservative families detransition? I literally can't understand you.

Fine, my numbers were off.

6

Justbe333 t1_j4x9w3e wrote

I was saying, the reason people de transition cannot be mostly due to a conservative family that made them do it, or gave them little choice… I cannot believe that for two reasons

  1. it just sounds like an LGBT talking point to stir up shit and there’s so many of those and many are beyond lazy and angering.
  2. If they were in a conservative household, they wouldn’t have had the possibility of transitioning in the first place. And knowing where they live, snd who their parents are , they would have known that before even trying.

Just so we’re on the same page De-transitioning would be qualified as —- I got the surgery and/or I took the hormones long enough to have permanent or long-term changes. Not simply “I changed my mind” or have to wait

1

adrianmakedonski t1_j4xa52i wrote

It can sound however it sounds, it's true. You literally don't know what you're talking about and therefore, this conversation is over. When you're ready to open your mind to actual trans experiences from actual trans people (not the hypothetical trans people that fill your scenarios), I'll be here ready to talk.

7

Justbe333 t1_j4xdszq wrote

More of a free-mind than an open one, but it’s open just not SO open that my brains slip out.. I think I’ll pass. But final thought. if you actually have gender dysphoria, i think you’re gonna realize that ALOT of your trans buddies ,don’t …and those of the people I was referring to as far as being ‘influential’. there’s evidence now, but not enough for it to be beyond refute. May be years down the line, but I think it’ll shine its light . And that’s not a cis opinion, or from my mind, itsthe opinion of a transwoman -that I happen to agree with. Take care.

1

HRHGracktheGreat t1_j4tdghm wrote

Your hate speech has been recorded and you will be prosecuted.

Please report to your nearest constable for gender reassignment education.

−35

McDaddyos t1_j4rxegq wrote

So many people furious over this story in Ontario. The more it gets brought up the less this person bothers me. My 2nd grade teacher Mrs. Gunderson had bigger bazookas than this.

19

samipuzzled t1_j4sfk4t wrote

I've met a lady with such large breasts before... which made her a candidate for free reduction surgery due to its toll on the vertebral column.

12

McDaddyos t1_j4svizs wrote

I just told you, Mrs. Gunderson did and probably still does.

9

Justbe333 t1_j4wgkh1 wrote

Yeah, but she got those at birth. She didn’t staple them on.

1

McDaddyos t1_j4wkqwb wrote

>Yeah, but she got those at birth.

What difference does that make?

>staple

Please, do elaborate on what you could possibly mean by this.

0

Core1989 t1_j4s3ea4 wrote

Faux news focusing on the important issues as always.

15

CoolBeansMan9 t1_j4s0xo8 wrote

/r/NotTheBeaverton, for us Canadian folks

10

kenlasalle t1_j4s2jkd wrote

... and only ends up embarrassing himself, as always.

7

BlurryBigfoot74 t1_j4sit8y wrote

He's got to span different countries to find material for his narrative.

5

Say10sadvocate t1_j4uk8de wrote

Surely this teacher is only doing it to damage the trans argument, right?

Cause that's all he's achieving.

5

PhotonSilencia t1_j4zjrxz wrote

Yes, it's quite literally a right-wing troll who does it to ridicule trans people. It's on purpose.

2

logan2043099 t1_j4wu0qk wrote

Fox News shouldn't be allowed on here it's not oniony for them to spread their hate and propaganda.

5

MJGM235 t1_j4wfap5 wrote

Republicans ridicule "freaks" however they are ALWAYS the ones caught with Trans hookers, child porn on their computers, or trying to meet underage boys 🤦🏻‍♂️ Everything they do is a projection.

4

cookiemonster247 t1_j4svzr3 wrote

Are these like prosthetic breast that dudes wearing

3

paxrom2 t1_j4vw8z4 wrote

Will he truly own the libs unless he actually gets a sex change?

3

Justbe333 t1_j4wfbj1 wrote

They’re all fake. What difference does it make if they’re prosthetic

1

cookiemonster247 t1_j4wfxkk wrote

Uhh, if they’re prosthetics you can take them off later and give you back a break. If they’re implants, the skin stretching would be insane. In fact, I don’t think that’s even possible to go half that big with implants.

2

cbk101 t1_j4wda4r wrote

Tucker is just trying to find someone to fill that hole in his life.

2

No_Wolf3071 t1_j4v1ub3 wrote

Stunts like that will get you…. ELECTED PRESIDENT

1

Substantial_Pirate95 t1_j4vzhhc wrote

He is finally doing it on public.. you know he walks around his house like that

1

rush22 t1_j4xwruw wrote

"My next guest? Cum. Why do liberals hate it? We know why. You would think the liberal mind would like it. But they don't. And Cum will be here to tell us more. Plus, the surprising connection your Cum might have with Hunter Biden's laptop. This, and more, cum-ming up haha. Stay tuned."

1

kushtiannn t1_j5017e6 wrote

So wearing massive prosthetic breasts is wrong?

I guess people shouldn’t do it in front of children, then.

1

mymar101 t1_j4su0lj wrote

I wish there was some way of removing this clown from TV. Sadly he’d just be replaced by an even bigger embrassement

0

Aquesm t1_j4tmsm5 wrote

Wasn’t it revealed that the teacher with the prosthetics was just a cis guy “trying to prove a point” about trans people or something?

0

PooperJackson t1_j4u2d79 wrote

I'm waiting for the actual plot twist at the end of the season. That will be the true reveal.

2

jlcatch22 t1_j4ugz14 wrote

I don’t know if that person is sincere or not, but it’s irrelevant to Fox News. This furthers their agenda either way.

1

Shorty604 t1_j4w23rw wrote

I believe that guy was trying to prove a point. Instead of addressing the issue they were discussing on limiting the size of the prosthetic breasts.

1

soysubstitute t1_j4uo3mh wrote

You can see it, Tucker is very turned on.

0

MassiveStallion t1_j4w3nhm wrote

Self-hating trans traitor goes on Republican TV show to expose themselves while exploiting school teacher for a scape goat.

News at never.

Woman can have large breasts. Especially ones that are bigger and heavier. While the teacher's dress in the picture is probably inappropriate, this is just another strain of criminalizing and controlling women's bodies.

It's easy enough to tell the teacher to wear a thicker bra and frumpier clothes, it's pretty fucked up to expose them as trans and blow it up all over TV and then use it as an excuse to jump out of the closet in your own fetish gear.

−3

Justbe333 t1_j4wfozb wrote

I’ll bet you whack it to your misinformed sham jokes on chaturbate 🫦

1

richstowe t1_j4t7w9q wrote

Tucker is a buffoon . So are all of you in this echo chamber for giving a shit .

−8

[deleted] t1_j4umpac wrote

I think Tucker wants to make sex with him/her/it

−8