Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

Singer-Such t1_irvl878 wrote

That judge should be defrocked

−4

The_Vegan_Chef t1_irvxo7z wrote

You should read the article.

9

Godkin405 t1_irw45d1 wrote

No I only read headlines and assume the absolute worse of the situation never fact check and then get really angry this is the way

7

Singer-Such t1_irwrakc wrote

How does reading the article paint the judge in a better light than the headline? Incredible

1

Goleeb t1_irzd1lt wrote

>She agreed to let him in but warned there would be “no funny business”. However, Feeney sexually assaulted her, paying no attention when she cried out.
>
>The victim fled, but he followed her and said: “It’ll be alright. We’ll talk in the morning.”

​

>However, the judge declined to ban Feeney from contacting women through the internet because he did not “want him excluded from normal life”.

“It’s not the online contact which proved problematic but rather the behaviour afterwards,” he said.
>
>
>
>“The order imposed is the lightest touch I can afford.”

The title might be sensational, but the judge should be fired.

1

Singer-Such t1_irwqpfk wrote

I did... he showed sympathy to a rapist and repeat abuser. That is not at all appropriate.

0

The_Vegan_Chef t1_irxbsow wrote

That absolutely not what happened according to the minutes of the filing, but feel free to signal

0