Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

woman_noises t1_ja6wfxf wrote

That's exactly the problem, all the cgi. The original movies used lots of practical effects, they actually built dinosaurs and had them move and it looked great and actually made you believe a dinosaur attack was happening, and in these new ones they just say, eh we'll just do everything on computers later and it shows.

4

goatAlmighty t1_ja6wgcu wrote

Because people think, just because the have an audience of potentially millions, that alone makes their opinion in any way relevant. They mix up reach with relevancy, so to say.

Btw, at the same time you have to accept that everybody has different tastes, and therefore, there certainly will be people who don't like Gal Gadot. Which is perfectly fine, as long as they don't expect that everybody else dislikes her, just because they do. And it goes the other way round as well. ;-)

2

gamingboy2003 t1_ja6wph0 wrote

Replying to woman_noises (#2,049,528)

And indeed. The CGI looks good in those movies. But if they cut it down more. And use the animatronics again, and maybe tweak it with some CGI or smth. It would be handier for the actors as well. And gives a more real feeling

−2

SenorArthurVandelay t1_ja6wrjf wrote

I mean it’s been this way since the first movies.

We argue about movies and sports and all kinds of dumb shit because we’re human.

Also the Jurassic World movies ranged from alright to trash to absolute fucking junk.

Also Gal Gadot was alright I guess. She’s like 110 lbs soaking wet tho. Should have been a bit more athletic rather than a lanky supermodel physique.

3

Purple-Application30 OP t1_ja6wwsz wrote

Replying to woman_noises (#2,049,528)

Honestly if you look back at how practical effects used to look I’d take the computer creations over a fake museum style dinosaur any day, and either way they still do use quite a lot of animatronics, but I saw somewhere that said it costs so much and takes too long to make a realistic robot dinosaur that it’s preferred to pay a team to spend day a month rendering it up then 2 months on a animatronic

−9

Mike_v_E t1_ja6x6xi wrote

Do you have any idea what will happen if people stopped giving their opinion?

2

Purple-Application30 OP t1_ja6x9fn wrote

Replying to SenorArthurVandelay (#2,049,589)

Idk Ik it just comes down to she’s my type so I can’t expect everyone to see her how I do but I just finished reading an article about how people want James Gunn to fire her cause she’s a Trash actress, there was a whole twitter feed on it, it tripped me out how many people were there hating on how she acts and I’m just like they can’t be fr?

−5

Uranus_Hz t1_ja6xajj wrote

Social media sucks the fun out of life.

2

countricola t1_ja6xvdt wrote

How dare people have a different opinion than mine???!!!

1

xseannnn t1_ja6zcwl wrote

This also applies to video games. I figured its because their lives are miserable.

2

mistercloob t1_ja71ohm wrote

Gal Gadot sucks as Wonder Woman. Sue sucks as an actress.

4

misterfriend t1_ja739qd wrote

I criticize stuff that I believe could do/be better, pointing out what causes the work to suffer. I also give credit where it's due. Some people are just negative in their focus, and I can choose to take or leave it.

Gal Gadot did a fine job, can't think of who would be a better Wonder Woman in this day and age. If people want to bitch without having supporting points, I just let them bitch. How miserable must they be?

2

TheOnlyJurg t1_ja7ckrm wrote

Replying to woman_noises (#2,049,528)

They also use different cameras than they used too, it’s why the original Jurassic park is so much better. Wide lenses allowed them to capture the sheer size of the dinos compared to the humans, modern films you’ll see close ups only involve the Dinos face. Hence Jurassic world feeling flat with no gravitas.

1