Submitted by nodeciapalabras t3_ylu0ir in askscience
OperationArgus t1_iv248ly wrote
All this chatter about the viability of offspring of different pairings is all very interesting, but people are overlooking the social aspect to all of this. Mitochondrial DNA is passed down from mother to offspring so there needs to be an unbroken line of daughters for there to be modern Sapiens with Neanderthal DNA. But think back to the first hybrid offspring of that Neanderthal mother - it would have most likely stayed with the mother and her social group, so you are more likely to find hybrids with Neanderthal mitochondrial DNA in the Neanderthal population. Hybrids in the Sapiens population would be more likely to be the offspring of Sapiens mothers and Neanderthal fathers. For there to be Neanderthal mitochondrial DNA the Neanderthal mother would need to be socially integrated into the Sapiens group. Maybe someone more knowledgeable than me can say if there’s any archaeological evidence for this. But it seems likely to me that these were “one night stands” (allow me to be anachronistic haha) rather than “marriages”, otherwise Neanderthal mitochondrial DNA would be part of our modern genetic diversity.
nodeciapalabras OP t1_iv2uj2f wrote
I liked this approach so much. We were simplifying it a lot.
Mrsrightnyc t1_iv2zher wrote
More likely as Sapain tribes moved north into Neanderthal territory they had less survival knowledge and ended up freezing or starving and the Neanderthals were more likely to take in the women because they were less threatening. Over time the hybrid humans kept mingling with new waves of Sapains coming from the south as the ice caps melted making their DNA increasingly less Neanderthal.
[deleted] t1_iv29074 wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_iv3g1je wrote
[removed]
Brukarnamnvaroppteke t1_iv4w3dm wrote
I don’t see why we should assume that (1) all Neanderthal-Homo Sapiens pairings were “one-night stands” and (2) all Neanderthal and Homo Sapiens societies were matrilocal. That seems to assume an improbable level of homogeneity of mating practices and social organization. It seems more intuitive to think that both pairings and societal arrangements (patri- vs. matrilocality) varied then as they do today.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments