Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

hcwhitewolf t1_j3rti7v wrote

There definitely are but the concerns voiced here are just more publicly visible due to the news coverage of the Cranston Armory shelter and homeless encampment closures. The concerns seem to be common across shelters where there are issues of drug/alcohol usage, sexual violence (very often between occupants of the shelter), and sanitation issues. These aren’t new issues that only are happening here. Maybe they are worse, but maybe they also aren’t.

I have a friend who lives out in Columbus, Ohio who used to be a social worker, where he often worked with people in shelters. From all the stories he told me, it wasn’t uncommon for there to be fights, people getting kicked out for doing drugs in the shelter or coming back to the shelter high or drunk, the staff would clean areas of the shelter just for the very next person to trash the area just to spite the staff working there.

The reality is that unfortunately some of the people staying in shelters are just not good people and they ruin it for every other homeless person who is genuinely just trying to get by. The actions of those people hurts the image and further stigmatizes homelessness and it’s a problem, and not one that can easily be fixed.

23

the_falconator OP t1_j3rug15 wrote

I think a big problem with the Cranston St facility is that many of the people that are staying there are people that have been kicked out of other shelters for the issues you bring up. Fighting, sexual assaults, drug use in the shelter.

18

Previous_Floor t1_j3ur3oj wrote

>I think a big problem with the Cranston St facility is that many of the people that are staying there are people that have been kicked out of other shelters for the issues you bring up. Fighting, sexual assaults, drug use in the shelter.

I saw an interview on the news with the guy running this place. He made it very clear that this is not a shelter, they don't have the resources to be a shelter, and its only purpose is to allow people in for a short period of time so they don't get hypothermia out in the cold.

5

the_falconator OP t1_j47mbz7 wrote

It's basically running as a shelter. People are living in there, they only call it a warming shelter to get around the more stringent regulations that a shelter has to follow.

2

pmk0286 t1_j3xl7tb wrote

Boot out the violent/sexual predator types on to the street with a “DNN” do not narcan order.

1

FrequentAnnual1262 t1_j3svz49 wrote

Every person is basically a good human being, these folks have a whole host of medical, psychological and sometimes addiction issues whose needs are often difficult to deal with. As a society we try to fit square pegs into round holes, it doesn't always work that well.

An issue is funding. I was involved in the deinstitutionalization efforts in the 80's. When they downsized Medical Center & Zambarano the money was supposed to follow the to the community to meet their needs, it didn't .

The money followed the Developmentally Disabled folks when they closed Ladd due to parent advocacy, the homeless do not have advocates.

−6

the_falconator OP t1_j3t55rj wrote

Not every person is a good human being. There certainly are homeless that are good people down on their luck. Being homeless doesn't mean you are a bad person by any means, but there are bad people that are also homeless too. Bad people exist in the world and yes some of them are homeless and causing problems, often for other homeless people.

12

FrequentAnnual1262 t1_j3t9j1r wrote

Told you last week my beliefs, you disagreed with my points, no need to rehash the same old.same old again. The Judeo- Christian POV would disagree with you most homeless have fallen through the proverbial "safety net", most need a multi service intervention that is unique to their needs. But does not exist...

−4

the_falconator OP t1_j3twvvg wrote

Yeah, I brought up all the points that this article makes. You said I was making shit up. Now this article comes out and the same points I raised are being brought up by other homeless people.

1

FrequentAnnual1262 t1_j3tx7in wrote

You alleged that a sleeping homeless person was raped by another man, and I queried if you contacted the police about this crime.. and then you went silent.

−2

the_falconator OP t1_j3txghe wrote

Yes providence police were contacted, he was arrested, did a little time in jail and is now back out on the streets.

4

FrequentAnnual1262 t1_j3txtqy wrote

A little time in jail for rape?? More absurdity..

−2

the_falconator OP t1_j3ty5dy wrote

I agree, but that's on the judge. I assume that he or she agrees with you that everyone is good on the inside and it was just his substance abuse issues causing him to rape.

5

FrequentAnnual1262 t1_j3tyfjj wrote

I assume means crap.. either you know the details or do not.

Do not misquote me, I never said that.. but of course in your limited mind, you probably read something completely different. Reading comprehension is a great quality.

−1

the_falconator OP t1_j3tytlr wrote

I know he got arrested and convicted, and I know he's out now because I see him on Cranston St.

3