Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

Advanced-Guard-4468 t1_j1r6hr5 wrote

No, but the people that live there do and they are entitled to representation just like urban people are.

−59

susinpgh t1_j1r8oo8 wrote

Their representation should represent the proportion of the population, not an out-sized vote that devalues the vote of the majority. The minority needs to learn to compromise instead of breaking the rules like they've been doing for the last fifty years.

54

FairyFlossPanda t1_j1rjx5v wrote

So you support fair non partisan redistricting that gives everyone a better chance to get representatives that share their values? Or are you one of those dipshits that goes "Hurr Durr look at all the big red splotches." Never mind some of those splotches have 10 people and an old cow living there but get outsized influence because of the way things currently are.

Let's put this another way. Say you lived in an apartment building and one guy for some reason rents 10 apartments. Lets say there are 5 other appartments and each one has 1 to 2 people in it. Now let's say your landlord is awesome and lets you guys vote on things like quiet hours, living space rules etc. Does he get more say because he physically takes up more space? Do the rest of you just give up? Well everyone else wanted quiet hours from 11 pm to 7 am but Dan decided he wants this place to be 24 hour quiet hours? We wanted a Christmas Tree in the lobby but Dan voted for a tower of dildos so Merry Fucking Christmas.

Oh and by the way I was very close to someone who went to church with one of the main republicans invovled in this. When he confronted him about the stopen election stuff and the conspiracies the rep said he knew it was b.s. but it was what people were calling him about so he had to pretend to believe it. And he didnt want to upset the voters.

7

Advanced-Guard-4468 t1_j1rl3ae wrote

You could have asked me like an adult and asked about gerrymandering, instead you asked and explained it to me like I'm a five year old. Since you didn't you don't deserve an answer.

So the rep who gerrymandered the districts said that's what the voters wanted. Sure they did, not everyone believes win at all costs.

−7

FairyFlossPanda t1_j1rljbz wrote

Sooo gonna assume the answer is "no I like things how they are because my side gets to play dirty but I dont wanna say that cause I'll look like a prick."

8

Advanced-Guard-4468 t1_j1rm0en wrote

You know what they say about assume...

No I'm not the prick here

Add:

There is nothing clean about politics. It's raw and dirty it always has been. Do I like it no.

1

MansourBahrami t1_j1r77vs wrote

It’s basically “rural colonization” at this point. We have bigger numbers in the big cities so we can tell you what to do from 500 miles away since we can outvote you in two small locations.

Basically what England did to the colonists oh hey there we have a central army and more people and even though you’re so far away you listen to us or we will force You to at gunpoint

−32

EarthRester t1_j1r8gbn wrote

Oh you poor victims! The very thought that you wouldn't be able to discriminate, or deny people bodily autonomy. Just because your ideology isn't the majority! How unfair! You're practically slaves! It's a holocaust of hicks and trash! /s

Get bent.

33