Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

TAllday t1_ivymrnq wrote

Reply to comment by Advanced-Guard-4468 in Remaining Uncalled PA House of Representatives Races as of 9:00 AM Thursday. From NYT by rndljfry

The Dems position is not extreme. You have one side that wants government restrictions and another side that believes the decision is medical and is between a woman and her doctor. Even if the government does not define a limit, the limit would be the medical ethics and safety of the decision which I believe currently is somewhere around the 20 to 24 week period.

2

Advanced-Guard-4468 t1_ivyo6k9 wrote

There are some dems that want zero restrictions even after the baby is born. That's an extreme position.

You post as if everyone in either party has the same position. They don't. Its an individual decision. If all the dems had the same position it would have been codified into law.

−1

TAllday t1_ivyqedm wrote

Oh cool. I can help you here. This is called a lie.

Edit: Also you already admitted it was a lie and that you knew it was a lie below, where you cite laws that allow for medically necessary (baby is dying or mother is dying) abortions after 24 weeks and not anything like post birth abortions as you claimed.

5

Advanced-Guard-4468 t1_ivyqnfn wrote

They were close to passing full term abortion in two states, NY and Illinois.

Two times in my lifetime the dems had totsl control in Washington and couldn't agree on a law.

1

TAllday t1_ivyrlct wrote

That is because the Dems have anti-choice people too. Not because of any extreme positions, other than the few Dems that refuse to acknowledge a woman’s health decision should be between the woman and their doctor.

1