Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

fastinguy11 t1_iz5i1hl wrote

well, nice that you did this but they are releasing the 2.1 version this week which should be a bit better compared to 2...

39

SleekEagle OP t1_iz5pkih wrote

This area moves quite fast doesn't it 🥲😂

44

GoofAckYoorsElf t1_iz9va9r wrote

Have they reintegrated NSFW content into the training? No? Alright, I'll stick with 1.5. I don't want anyone to dictate what kind of art is fine and what is not.

4

Drooflandia t1_iz70vnf wrote

It's a discord bot. It can't even compare to the freedom you have from even 1.4

−8

astrange t1_iz7dqpi wrote

That's Midjourney. You can download SD all you want.

5

Drooflandia t1_iz7fqy0 wrote

2.1 is a discord bot. You cannot download a discord bot.

−8

itsnotlupus t1_iz7i5hm wrote

2.1 is not a discord bot.

There is a discord preview of 2.1 available, in anticipation of the actual model release scheduled for this week, which will of course be downloadable.

See /r/StableDiffusion/comments/zdixtt/sd_21_release_soon/

13

Drooflandia t1_iz7vtse wrote

Thanks for that. I hadn't seen that thread. Just a bunch of stuff talking about 2.1 only being a discord bot. Also for those that don't want to type in reddit.com/here's the full link. https://www.reddit.com/r/StableDiffusion/comments/zdixtt/sd_21_release_soon/

1

fastinguy11 t1_izax65q wrote

it is released now so... so yea

1

Drooflandia t1_izb2f8u wrote

Yeah lol I've been downvoted a ton regardless because people don't read the convos.

1

vzq t1_iz5tw3g wrote

TBH I’m surprised no one is going all in on NSFW support for clip/SD. Seems such a large and obvious market.

28

Drinniol t1_iz5wr7u wrote

There is a project, https://www.reddit.com/r/StableDiffusion/comments/z420nf/unstable_diffusion_is_going_to_do_what/

Putting aside the whether or not they should do this, it's very unclear that they actually have the technical knowhow and hardware to do this. It's easy to say you're going to do something, much harder to actually do it. Training large models - even if you're just training them - is really technically complicated. You have to do a lot of data wrangling and hardware stuff.

27

---AI--- t1_iz6z67m wrote

It is already done it's completely photo realistic. Pm me for links, for obvious reasons.

6

TheRealSerdra t1_iz6bpg4 wrote

I was heavily involved in the UD project at the start (have since stepped down) and tbh I’m skeptical. I think some good NSFW models will get made (some already have) but nothing truly spectacular.

5

---AI--- t1_iz6yj07 wrote

Haha they are big time. Just look at pixiv. But warning it is obviously "niche" porn that isn't so easily available. And porn of non-porn actresses.

1

sfcl33t t1_iz6jl5o wrote

Thank you, have been out of the loop for a few weeks and was too afraid to ask at this point :)

7

jaycrossler t1_iz7gwsn wrote

Thank you for writing that. It made sense and helped me understand more what I’ve been experiencing.

2

SleekEagle OP t1_iz9nh0v wrote

My pleasure :) I'm sure v2 will be awesome in the long run but I think it makes sense to stick with v1 in the short term (although I haven't seen 2.1's performance)

1