Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

AgnosticStopSign t1_iytgnsx wrote

You can disagree without calling anyone sane or insane. Whats worse, you really dont even know why you disagree, just want to fit in and seem cool.

When the science catches up and im correct, youll stupidly accept it now that science says so.

−7

evanc3 t1_iytguvu wrote

No, actually I have a graduate degree in thermodynamics which is quite literally the study of atomic vibrations. So I'm disagreeing on the basis that everything you said is completely at odds with what I've learned and applied.

If the scientific consensus is that you are correct, I will beleive it because of the inherent benefits of the scientific method: transparency, reproducibility, and peer critique. Not just because some scientist says so. Please do some research on the hierarchy of evidence.

But you're right, I will change it to "rational". I shouldn't be stigmatizing

7

AgnosticStopSign t1_iythh37 wrote

My idea is still rational. I explaine the rationale with evidence. You said vibration, im talking frequency. Not exactly the same thing.

Its iust so jarring you reflexive dismiss it, taking a true understanding of reality for granted under assumptions.

Like I said, you can disagree and explain why, but your belief or lack thereof does not invalidate that this occurs in reality, and businesses use it to much success.

−6

evanc3 t1_iytiuj9 wrote

You keep doing edits after I reply.

But you realize the the frequency "most harmonic" to water is literally how a microwave cooks food, right? I'm dismissing it because people like you would microwave people to death if you could carry out your experiments.

I'm not disagree with the actual science of color and emotion. My wife is a neuropsychologist and took a whole class on vision and neuroscience. That has empirical evidence.

I'm disagreeing with someone slapping a bunch of work together to form some half-baked "unified theory of frequency" or some shit lol

The fact that you consider yourself to have a "true understanding of reality" is by far the most jarring part.

3

evanc3 t1_iythnvb wrote

YOU said vibrations, my guy. And if it isn't the frequency of vibrations that you're talking about, then what is it the frequency of? Especially the "harmonic frequency of water" part

Enlighten me rational science man

2