Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

AgnosticStopSign t1_iys8rti wrote

Heres my 2 cents. You can take it or leave it.

The entire universe and everything in it is vibrating. The frequency of the laser is harmonic with the human body’s frequency.

I know this is true, and let me explain to you by first starting with frequency.

Frequency is interchangeable. As such: light, sounds, and emotions can all be expressed on a equivalent frequency scale. I.e. 120hz is a color on the electromagnetic scale (idrk just spitballing), 120hz is a sound pitch thats F# (idrk just spitballing) and also, when you hear or see that frequency, it makes you feel X.

This is why many fast food restaurants use red and yellow, many modern movies resort to an increasing pitch sound to simulate tension (sadly, as previously movies used acting to do that, but i digress).

Now we are well aware of this, and we even have science fair experiments on it. Theres both a visual and audio version. Both involve planting seeds and exposing them to different colors (red, green, blue, etc) or music (classic, country, rock, etc) and comparing their growth.

They do indeed affect growth.

At a deeper level, we are 70% water, and so the frequency that is most harmonic with water would be most beneficial to us.

Also, frequency creates form, as if you put sand on a speaker, each frequency will create its own shapes. This could hold key to the mechanism behind whats occuring

Edit: sound = form video

light affecting growth in plants video

No reason to think this wouldnt apply to us as well

−21

datnetcoder t1_iysmjfe wrote

Absolutely hilarious that you have this whole nonsensical thought process based on frequency, and your example of a “color” on the EM “scale” (the word you’re looking for is spectrum) is 120hz. Visible red light is about 430 trillion Hz… cracking me up that you said one hundred and twenty lol. You’re on the right order of magnitude on sound.

Re: planting seeds - the light experiments make perfect intuitive sense as photosynthesis is deeply sensitive to EM frequency. The sound experiments are interesting and less intuitive but the gist of it is that sound is a mechanical stimulus.

Your claim that the frequency that is most harmonic with water is ridiculous in the way you are presenting it, but that said, the wavelength of the laser used was critical in the results observed. But literally nothing to do with the “harmonic frequency” of water.

9

evanc3 t1_iyt6kn2 wrote

>Heres my 2 cents. You can take it or leave it.

Every rational person should leave it

5

AgnosticStopSign t1_iytgnsx wrote

You can disagree without calling anyone sane or insane. Whats worse, you really dont even know why you disagree, just want to fit in and seem cool.

When the science catches up and im correct, youll stupidly accept it now that science says so.

−7

evanc3 t1_iytguvu wrote

No, actually I have a graduate degree in thermodynamics which is quite literally the study of atomic vibrations. So I'm disagreeing on the basis that everything you said is completely at odds with what I've learned and applied.

If the scientific consensus is that you are correct, I will beleive it because of the inherent benefits of the scientific method: transparency, reproducibility, and peer critique. Not just because some scientist says so. Please do some research on the hierarchy of evidence.

But you're right, I will change it to "rational". I shouldn't be stigmatizing

7

AgnosticStopSign t1_iythh37 wrote

My idea is still rational. I explaine the rationale with evidence. You said vibration, im talking frequency. Not exactly the same thing.

Its iust so jarring you reflexive dismiss it, taking a true understanding of reality for granted under assumptions.

Like I said, you can disagree and explain why, but your belief or lack thereof does not invalidate that this occurs in reality, and businesses use it to much success.

−6

evanc3 t1_iytiuj9 wrote

You keep doing edits after I reply.

But you realize the the frequency "most harmonic" to water is literally how a microwave cooks food, right? I'm dismissing it because people like you would microwave people to death if you could carry out your experiments.

I'm not disagree with the actual science of color and emotion. My wife is a neuropsychologist and took a whole class on vision and neuroscience. That has empirical evidence.

I'm disagreeing with someone slapping a bunch of work together to form some half-baked "unified theory of frequency" or some shit lol

The fact that you consider yourself to have a "true understanding of reality" is by far the most jarring part.

3

evanc3 t1_iythnvb wrote

YOU said vibrations, my guy. And if it isn't the frequency of vibrations that you're talking about, then what is it the frequency of? Especially the "harmonic frequency of water" part

Enlighten me rational science man

2