theageofnow

theageofnow t1_jd7vnfy wrote

Hi, truck gets loaded up at the warehouse based on a route. More stops can be added to the route, a real tangible increase in productivity and commerce. Truck capacity is rarely an issue. If you have a simple office job or service job where you don’t have any sort of exposure to these sorts of deliveries or commerce, I understand how it might be difficult to conceptualize, but in aggregate these make a majority of deliveries by weight and volume, not Amazon boxes and door dash, which may be more visible to laymen.

2

theageofnow t1_jd7tis2 wrote

Right, just because they’re “set” doesn’t mean they can’t be unset and reset. In one of my previous careers I regularly had to book van couriers for deliveries. That business could potentially be more efficient. In my current business I have deliveries made in NYC from a warehouse in Connecticut. That happens whenever I need to order materials, it’s not “set”.

2

theageofnow t1_jd6f540 wrote

I don’t think “throwing more money” will fix the MTA, but I do think less money will make things worse. I do think there is an enormous amount of deferred maintenance that makes things more expensive to run.

I do think people respond to tolls by driving less. I know I do.

1

theageofnow t1_jd5s8ud wrote

>You think that all deliveries in the city are made with trucks?

Congestion pricing will be a boon for deliveries. Delivery drivers will be able to make more deliveries with less private cars congesting the roadways

3

theageofnow t1_jd5s3wd wrote

>NOTHING in return for the average NY’er.

how about less congestion in Manhattan (and probably Brooklyn, Queens, and The Bronx) and more dedicated funding for the transit system that a majority of New Yorkers use?

3

theageofnow t1_jcijs56 wrote

No. There is no funding mechanism. Is it a “market distortion”? By limiting rent increases, surely, yes, but it’s not subsidized by the state or the city or federal government or anyone else. Also rent stabilized does not necessarily mean that the maximum legal rent is less than the market rate rent. There are many RS apartments whose rent is close to market rate (on average, they’re well below).

1

theageofnow t1_jcih627 wrote

Given the vacancy rate in NYC is very low (<1%-3% over the last decade or so), this won’t actually do anything to make it easier to find an apartment for anyone and might just make it harder (by introducing more rules and more small landlords who have more time to be busybodies over micromanaging their tenants in their 10 apartments).

5

theageofnow t1_jcigfom wrote

More restrictive zoning laws will make the city worse and more difficult to find lodging, both permanent and temporary. They just made it more difficult to build hotels a few years ago (NYC had a huge hotel construction boom… and corresponding boom in tourism). There is a shortage of lodgings, both permanent and temporary, which has manifested itself in AirBnB being very profitable for some people (it shouldn’t be)

3