reveazure
reveazure t1_ja69s7r wrote
The abundance of hearts in cultural iconography seems to be growing in inverse proportion to the amount of fucks anyone actually has to give about anyone else.
reveazure t1_j5wlsjk wrote
Reply to comment by senatorium in MBTA to close part of Orange Line to work on slow zones it said were eliminated, but weren’t, during full shutdown by ik1nky
It sure sounds like the tufts-back bay stretch could be addressed by this shutdown. I wonder if the cologne egg replacement project led to a discovery that they hadn’t been placed according to some standard, and that resulted in the slow zone being retained?
reveazure t1_j2bputl wrote
Reply to comment by therealcmj in As Infrastructure Windfall Approaches, Transit Agencies Grapple With How to Spend It by spedmunki
AFC?
reveazure OP t1_izq26ni wrote
Reply to MIT campus will remain open to public by reveazure
Previously there was an announcement that most of the MIT buildings including the infinite corridor would be permanently closed to the general public as an extension of covid policies. It looks like public feedback has done its job and they decided to return to the pre-covid open policy.
Sometimes things work out.
reveazure t1_iyej07v wrote
Reply to comment by Master_Dogs in Finally connecting Red and Blue lines by MDeehan
The 8 years includes 3 years of design and 1 year of contract bidding, according to the presentation. The construction is only supposed to take around 4 years.
reveazure OP t1_iy67146 wrote
Reply to comment by Reasonable_Move9518 in Is there life after Darwin’s? by reveazure
Good to see someone shares my concerns. I’m hoping someone takes over the business.
reveazure OP t1_iy66p4f wrote
Reply to comment by Reasonable_Move9518 in Is there life after Darwin’s? by reveazure
This is basically my problem: why can’t it still be 1998?
reveazure OP t1_iy5ahxo wrote
Reply to comment by imustachelemeaning in Is there life after Darwin’s? by reveazure
I forgot about this - I should pay them a visit during lunch time.
reveazure OP t1_iy5aczp wrote
Reply to comment by albertogonzalex in Is there life after Darwin’s? by reveazure
I mean out of the way for me. Not an overall criticism, just a personal comment which I should probably have kept to myself.
reveazure OP t1_iy52kde wrote
Reply to comment by Kingpine42069 in Is there life after Darwin’s? by reveazure
Well, the Sherman would be the ultimate test, but for example the Soldiers Field or Somerville would be good.
reveazure OP t1_iy5295u wrote
Reply to comment by Eagle7924 in Is there life after Darwin’s? by reveazure
I think we may disagree on what constitutes a “good” sandwich. I guess you like American style subs which is fine. Darwin is more cafe sandwiches.
reveazure OP t1_iy524pp wrote
Reply to comment by traumasponge in Is there life after Darwin’s? by reveazure
That looks good, though a bit out of the way.
reveazure t1_ixjsd66 wrote
Reply to comment by wallet535 in Should the state regulate Internet service pricing similar to utilities? by wallet535
Well the problem I have isn’t the rate but I just can’t get anything better than 1 Mbps DSL. If they said “you can’t charge more than $10/Mbps” that might also work.
reveazure t1_ixhxx9y wrote
I don’t know if there’s easier ways to do this. But one idea I had was that the state guarantees a certain level of internet connectivity anywhere in the state. If someone isn’t getting that, the state loans them a starlink dish and they pay some fee cheaper than any internet provider. The internet providers would then be incentivized to finish running fiber throughout the state so they can continue receiving revenue.
reveazure t1_jb2zytr wrote
Reply to I guess "ugliest" depends on the weather. Looks pretty handsome rn. by oozforashag
It looks like an extremely clumsy game of Tetris that got abandoned halfway through.