qepdibpbfessttrud
qepdibpbfessttrud t1_jeextih wrote
Reply to comment by SgathTriallair in 1X's AI robot 'NEO' by Rhaegar003
They do, but LLMs may leapfrog carefully constructed vector space training/inference that Tesla had heavily invested into
qepdibpbfessttrud t1_jecv91h wrote
LLMs will accelerate BCI research and we'll hopefully be telepathically talking in more universal new thought symbol language optimized for data compression, speed and precision, and also for verbose emotion translation, rather than in 100+ languages optimized for talking with sound waves in short distance
Before that current trend of English supremacy will continue slowly - through new useful data, especially scientific, and almost all useful code being produced in English
qepdibpbfessttrud t1_jecjpnh wrote
Reply to comment by GorgeousMoron in My case against the “Pause Giant AI Experiments” open letter by Beepboopbop8
Can u share what are u running for now?
qepdibpbfessttrud t1_jecjfkc wrote
Reply to comment by qrayons in My case against the “Pause Giant AI Experiments” open letter by Beepboopbop8
>it's hard to update the tools without everything breaking
Tell me about it. Maybe AI at least could end the dependency hell
qepdibpbfessttrud t1_jecizg0 wrote
Reply to comment by Kafke in When people refer to “training” an AI, what does that actually mean? by Not-Banksy
Misconceptions are part of total human knowledge, though. Both specific misconceptions and the category as a whole. GPT gives good answer if asked about it
It's important to remember when and why we were wrong
qepdibpbfessttrud t1_jech4qg wrote
It goes something like this, I'd imagine: postponed hirings, new small businesses growing without hiring, appearance of corporate solutions like SalesForce (GPT is like ISP for the analogy), some time passes to prove benefits in numbers, then massive reforms and layoffs in big corporations follow
Also, maybe new small AI businesses just outcompete older guard in the matter of months and your longtime employer goes bankrupt
qepdibpbfessttrud t1_jecgpqr wrote
The trick is that innovation doesn't end in the case of AI. Unless a lot of smart people are missing something fundamental about intelligence, development of AI is perpetual escalating fountain of innovation
qepdibpbfessttrud t1_jecgdn4 wrote
Reply to There's wild manipulation of news regarding the "AI research pause" letter. by QuartzPuffyStar
> And yet, its being sold as a capitalist stratagem to gain time
Partially, it's exactly what it is. Letter doesn't magically change the fact that everyone competes
qepdibpbfessttrud t1_jecg4jc wrote
Reply to Ray Kurzweil Predicted Simulated Biology is a Path to Longevity Escape Velocity by Dr_Singularity
LEV deserves more attention. It's the most important solution vector to depopulation/aging/social support global problem
qepdibpbfessttrud t1_jecfl8v wrote
Reply to LAION launches a petition to democratize AI research by establishing an international, publicly funded supercomputing facility equipped with 100,000 state-of-the-art AI accelerators to train open source foundation models. by BananaBus43
Open source everything. Information belongs to no one
qepdibpbfessttrud t1_je9cd3q wrote
Reply to comment by flexaplext in The Only Way to Deal With the Threat From AI? Shut It Down by GorgeousMoron
>true global cooperation has to come first
It won't come. Decentralization is the best bet
qepdibpbfessttrud t1_je7d15u wrote
Reply to Connecting your Brain to GPT-4, a guide to achieving super human intelligence. by CyberPunkMetalHead
Don't connect yourself to cloud. Did "I, Robot" taught your nothing?
qepdibpbfessttrud t1_je229vp wrote
As people are saying, containment isn't possible. Look at Stanford Alpaca. The best bet on alignment is fastest widest distribution of AI tools. The more people are on it, the higher chances that at least someone will figure it out
qepdibpbfessttrud t1_je0u88v wrote
Reply to comment by ajahiljaasillalla in Chat-GPT 4 is here, one theory of the Singularity is things will accelerate exponentially, are there any signs of this yet and what should we be watching? by Arowx
Singularity is near
qepdibpbfessttrud t1_je0tu71 wrote
Reply to comment by Iffykindofguy in How can we empower humans through A.I. while minimizing job displacement? Ideas? by sweetpapatech
I don't know if u do
qepdibpbfessttrud t1_je0s5jg wrote
Reply to comment by Iffykindofguy in How can we empower humans through A.I. while minimizing job displacement? Ideas? by sweetpapatech
I have one cow, u have two pigs, cows and pigs are scarce, I wanna bacon, we trade, economy is bigger, barter is simplified with money, accumulation of money is capital
We're so wealthy, that not only cows cost money, but even our pure attention. At some low price I'm willing to pay u if u'll be just seeing everything I post
Beyond ad-model I think attention economy will still sustain on the basis of outsourcing expertise
qepdibpbfessttrud t1_je0odvk wrote
Reply to comment by AGVann in Which communities have you found where people are both smart about what AI is and isn't currently capable of, but where everyone in there is convinced we'll have AI soon that's smarter than 95% of humans at all computer based tasks within a few years? by TikkunCreation
Porn drives innovation, a lot of people don't like to admit it, but male sex drive is generally insatiable. Huge vector of overall technological progress
qepdibpbfessttrud t1_je0o3av wrote
Reply to comment by Iffykindofguy in How can we empower humans through A.I. while minimizing job displacement? Ideas? by sweetpapatech
Capitalism arises from scarcity, attention won't stop being scarce, some people will have more eyeballs on them than others and will have income and capital for it
Hopefully, Sam Altman is right and energy prices will drastically approach zero, individual energy/food autarky is pretty important
qepdibpbfessttrud t1_je0nrhz wrote
Reply to How can we empower humans through A.I. while minimizing job displacement? Ideas? by sweetpapatech
Focus on locally run AI, ideally nullify copyright monopolistic protections. I very much agree with Elon that the only way to stay relevant is more or less merge with new tech, much closely than we did with computers
Though, I have strong objections to cloud compute in the picture. If u want Borg, organize voluntarily, I'd prefer to not join the Borg
qepdibpbfessttrud t1_je0mubq wrote
Reply to comment by msabbiewoo in Are the big CEO/ultra-responsible/ultra-high-paying positions in business currently(or within the next year) threatened by AI? by fluffy_assassins
Even ChatGPT can in many cases with its 3000 word limit and non-specialized training
Due to Peter's principle
qepdibpbfessttrud t1_je0mii1 wrote
Reply to comment by 1BannedAgain in Are the big CEO/ultra-responsible/ultra-high-paying positions in business currently(or within the next year) threatened by AI? by fluffy_assassins
Peter's principle. U can't go two steps without seeing it all around in corporate world. There's a skyscraper for improvement
Fuckers slow economic growth for all of us
qepdibpbfessttrud t1_je0m8gd wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Chat-GPT 4 is here, one theory of the Singularity is things will accelerate exponentially, are there any signs of this yet and what should we be watching? by Arowx
OpenAI policies is the least interesting thing among other things that are happening in AI. Also, it seems they are more or less hard-coded by a single pre-prompt
qepdibpbfessttrud t1_je0m1sf wrote
Reply to comment by Professional_Copy587 in Chat-GPT 4 is here, one theory of the Singularity is things will accelerate exponentially, are there any signs of this yet and what should we be watching? by Arowx
U don't need AGI to change the world upside down, though
qepdibpbfessttrud t1_je0lxri wrote
Reply to Chat-GPT 4 is here, one theory of the Singularity is things will accelerate exponentially, are there any signs of this yet and what should we be watching? by Arowx
> What signs are there that things are starting to accelerate faster and faster?
Experts keep getting surprised
qepdibpbfessttrud t1_jeey9as wrote
Reply to comment by genericrich in 🚨 Why we need AI 🚨 by StarCaptain90
It's inevitable. From my perspective the safest path forward is opening everything and distributing risk