pihb666

pihb666 t1_j0vrmeh wrote

Your attempt at being a Captain Save-a-hoe is commendable but flawed. I never mentioned violence as a solution to our overpopulation problem. Those are your words, not mine. Your whole premise is based off your flawed assumptions and assumptions do not make good debate. Maybe you should have joined the debate team in high school. It would have served you well.

1

pihb666 t1_j0vokjj wrote

Yeah I'm fine. While you did make a statement of fact you also included a threat of killing Americans. Hope you aren't here in the States. The FBI takes a dim view of foreign people making terrorist threats. I can see you have a problem with the US. Can you tell us where the bad American touched you? Do you need a stuffed animal to hug your pain away?

0

pihb666 t1_j0v19kp wrote

The world is dying because there are too many people on it. Both China and India have over a billion people. The next most populous nation has 330 million. That is almost 3 times as many people. That is my metric. The world needs less people. Logic says you start with the 2 countries with over a billion people.

0

pihb666 t1_j0v02ob wrote

Where have I made a proposal? I don't recall making any proposals. I don't care how the Chinese and India have gotten to the point they are at with their population but that is a them problem. Why should the world enable them to have way too many people? Is it "insanely stupid" to conclude that 1 billion people are going to consume more coal than 100 million people? I don't think so.

−3

pihb666 t1_j0uf18u wrote

Is there not over 1 billion people in both China and India? If there weren't that any people in those places, would they still need to burn all that coal? Please tell me how any of that isn't realistic?

−5
−3

pihb666 t1_iy7x4x9 wrote

Dude has a point. Like we are going to leave this planet and all of a sudden humans morph into right thinking good people like star trek. If humans ever make it to other planets and colonize, it'll just be more fighting and greed and suffering. All on a larger scale.

2