I support logging on Nat Forests if done responsibly. You can bet that the foresters managing the cuts care for the environment and responsible land management. They are professionals and public servants. Very little old growth forest is left in Vermont and mature forests should be in rotation for cutting. Lots of species occur in disturbed and successional forests. With out disturbances, you just don’t get certain species of plants and birds. So responsible forestry yes, fear mongering NIMBY no.
nozamy t1_iysp5gg wrote
Reply to Curious to know what folks think about this messaging? by Johnny9Toes
I support logging on Nat Forests if done responsibly. You can bet that the foresters managing the cuts care for the environment and responsible land management. They are professionals and public servants. Very little old growth forest is left in Vermont and mature forests should be in rotation for cutting. Lots of species occur in disturbed and successional forests. With out disturbances, you just don’t get certain species of plants and birds. So responsible forestry yes, fear mongering NIMBY no.