Stupid?

You don't get it. My theory is, that this kind of weapon is build to conquer resources and land from people not able to defend them self. It is not for defend themselves from anybody able to attack. We have to discuss it, because it is built for future crimes of the US.

Maybe, but if you want to use your aircraft carrier you have go near the cost, and there is no chance to find a small, quietly submarine there. Or in the scenario of the Russian flagship, Ukraine just use more than one missle and a drone. There is no upper limit to use just more missiles or drones. Aircraft carrier not useful in modern wars outside bombing some stone age culture.

It is just the mechanism of a military complex. There cannot be a reason to spent ten times more money on military services than every one else.

Just look at the exercises with Europe and look at the armada of the Russian flagship.

There is no scenario where you could fight someone with their own military complex with a aircraft carrier. For example every training mission with Europe counterparts ends with a sunken aircraft carrier. Sweden could fight them with their German export sub marines. Germans own ones with a much better technology never have to take part. China and Russia got anti ship missles, the sunken flagship of Russia shows you how this scenario will be. Aircraft carrier are good to bomb countries without infrastructure, but nothing more.