macgruff
macgruff t1_jcgbpkh wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Walking with wagging tail through the woods by lnfinity
Hey, the more vegans there are the more piggies and moo cows I get to eat instead! We need to encourage veganism, and bug eating, cuz that’s not going to be me!
macgruff t1_j93unb0 wrote
Reply to comment by Im_Talking in Mindfulness-based attention training vastly improves the focus and emotional regulation of high school students by TimTars
Correction… via your own source, “a” study found…. This is the error of thinking in todays glut of information from anywhere and everywhere. Curation is actually a good thing as it would have weeded out this article to obscurity. I’m not outright refuting the veracity of this , one, study. But, it didn’t also look long term about the efficacy of showing teens that it is an option and in their later years may be more receptive. If you ask a bunch of kids, “What’s better? We spend an hour talking about Tiktok? Or we do some mindfulness exercises?” Of course they’re going to say “it’s boring”. They’re teenagers. Quite literally their brains are still developing but to throw the baby out for the bath water is a very bad conclusion made by this, one, study.
What I’d rather see is a meta-analysis study across many ages, survey/data collection methods, pooled mental health data, etc. and who knows… maybe it will confirm this, one, study. But to go find, one, study to back your assumptions is a slippery slope to follow.
No criticism, Im not attacking you
macgruff t1_j1znje9 wrote
Reply to Moon rivers? UK scientists at heart of mission to extract water from lunar rock by Gari_305
Ok, I have a science background in medicine so, not astrophysics or chem, so wondering if anyone can ELI5+ me…
We’ve been studying in detail, the Moon, and even brought back soil, new LiDAR-esque water discovery types of missions, other countries contributing and it is certainly not obvious that there is appreciable water there. Even if “locked” into other forms and or molecules.
At this point, are we barking up the wrong tree? Is there confirmed amounts of water that would even be any benefit, at scale <<<<< key concept <<<< to make any type of industry feasible?
Mars, does appear to have had, historically, an ecosystem of water in appreciable amounts, but my opinion based on all discoveries is that all feasibly useful amounts of water were blown/evaporated into space along with their prior atmosphere.
Do we have any astrophysics type of folks out there able to say, there is definitely enough water or sources of minerals that can beget copious amounts without destroying yet another heavenly body? Else, “we will” become a “planet killing” aliens species, not altruists as Musk would have you believe.
macgruff t1_j1g0043 wrote
Reply to comment by Bryanb337 in TikTok confirms employees improperly accessed journalists' user data in hunt for leaks by j1ggy
Well, we’ve got the idgits… it’s not really a “look at me” platform though, as everyone else would ridicule 🤪
macgruff t1_j1e13vn wrote
Reply to comment by 5of10 in TikTok confirms employees improperly accessed journalists' user data in hunt for leaks by j1ggy
Also, it is the current playground of the idiotic and vapid. Just like Insta, Vine (which TikTok basically “is”, just with newer features), Facebook, MySpace, etc etc.
macgruff t1_ixjg94e wrote
The question should be… WHY TF is this still necessary? Not to go full Steve Forbes, but a standard VAT tax + a progressive curve flat tax eliminates not only the issue at hand here, but also
- no more “filing taxes”. Mother fuckers, you (IRS) already know every cent I’ve ever made, just make the withholding tax, “the tax”
- no more April 15th
- eliminates loopholes and personal vs business tax bs
- no more “forms” and allowances for billionaires to pay nothing while I have an effective rate of over 40%
Yes, I know there are many arguments against scrapping our tax code but they pale in comparison to the advantages
Oh I forgot, also… no private company then has any access to YOUR information
macgruff t1_jed0kfn wrote
Reply to CEOs are quietly backtracking on remote work—and more companies could follow by ethereal3xp
All these corporate spinsters trying resolve issues of their own making. For many, working from home makes fiscal sense for all. There is no definitive proof that commuting, sitting in an office, and then having to again clog freeways, pollute the air and ruin our own work-life balance, has any positive effect on productivity. In fact, many of us have proven exactly the opposite argument; many of us are MORE productive working from home.
Facilities managers were warned (anecdotally by me to our Facilities Managers, and) en masse, for multitudes of workers, management, senior management and even CEOs, that if they did not plan for increased vacancies, they would be left holding bag on poorly negotiated contracts, commercial real estate mortgages and more often, leasing, of office space.
“Poor planning on your part does not constitute an emergency on my part”.
The rest, like the authors of these puff pieces, are merely shills for property managers who are losing out to those who DID plan well enough to expect a reduction of the in-person workforce. Enough! of these puff pieces… they’re just lies, contorted stories and innuendo designed to reset us all back into our Kafka-esque cubicle spaces.
Do not fall for this bullshit.
*Understand, this is not to say that many, many “jobs” are not only fit, but are better suited for in-person office work, but that should not preclude the millions and millions of jobs that have no reason to be forced back into cubicles.