> HE400SE sound better than HD600's with a lot of kinds of music. Honestly in some cases they sound better than Focal Bathys

Wow. That is interesting. I very much want the HD600, but too expensive for me [let alone the Focal :-)]. I have the 400SE with me now but i can not listen to it. It is too sibilant and heavy for me. I am using a 3 times cheaper Superlux 672 instead, which i love. I also had the 560S, TYGR 300, DT 880, Meze 99 - i could not accept their sound quality after getting used to my equalized, ear-pad-changed 672. This shows that one's preference can override the price comparison.

Separate replacement pads are more expensive and the selected type may happens to be not compatible with this headphone type.

>higher Ohm models

higher impedance types

• Buy the Evo and a 672.
• Replace the horrible earpads of the 672 with the pleather pads of the Evo.
• Sell the Evo with the velour pads.
• EQ the 672.
• Now you have perhaps the best headphone that you can get for < 200$.

Which software did you use to render the output of the microphone into a frequency response?

The 560S is a dividing headphone. Many top famous audiophiles love it. Some users dislike it. I also disliked and sold it.

This is not basic. This is end-game. This headphone is my dream but too expensive for me, let alone those devices under it. Enjoy it :-).

I could not listen to the 558, it sounds as a 560S, very thin. The 559 is a step-up. All equalized.

>They’re really good value for money.

What is their advantage compared to Superlux types? Are these not just a copy of Superlux with the transducer bought from Superlux?

I have not heard it but everybody is saying that it has good resolution.

I am just a lay speculating.

Next technical step is that headphone manufacturers will measure their headphones and publish the measurements on their websites. They will also publish the accompanying correction files for software equalization.

The step after that may be measuring their headphones individually. It is not very expensive. And gives great value by smoothing the highs.

I disagree. If it was just tuning then everyone [manufacturers and users] would just tune their headphone to be similar to HD600.

What is the worst thing by DSP?
Why not for all headphones?

I think: for every instance of headphone: i should be ably to read a unique id from it, go to the manufacturer's website and query the equalizations files to some targets specifically for that instance. I know that their measurements are not perfect either, but still the best that an average user would get otherwise.

What is wrong with shortcuts set on the good old regular keyboard? Nothing is closer to the hands anyway.