ialsohaveadobro
ialsohaveadobro t1_j422oa2 wrote
Reply to comment by bannana in Fyre (2019) The infamous rock festival conceived by an overly ambitious egotistical entrepreneur (CC) [01:25:28] by ghostmrchicken
In the absence of Rule, no wonder there was anarchy
ialsohaveadobro t1_j08trsn wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in San Antonio's 'shit sandwich cop' working as a police officer again, this time in Floresville by Kw5kvb5ebis
It's civilly enforced (you sue).
ialsohaveadobro t1_j08tl78 wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in San Antonio's 'shit sandwich cop' working as a police officer again, this time in Floresville by Kw5kvb5ebis
You're looking for freedom from consequences, then.
And, unless there's something going on that you didn't mention, you're probably overestimating how far anyone would go out of their way to interfere with your job prospects.
ialsohaveadobro t1_iyeboil wrote
Reply to comment by KSIChancho in Josh Hawley voting against inter racial and same sex marriages by SearchingBleach
I agree with the other commenter but I want to add that it is true that changing the law wouldn't prevent people from having marriage ceremonies, though. I knew people who were in same-sex marriages before Obergefell (in a red state).
They had their ceremonies and celebrations just the same as usual. It's just that when the rubber hits the road and, say, one of them ends up in the hospital and the other isn't allowed to visit because they're not "really" married-- situations like that-- you see how the legal rights and affects of a state-recognized marriage are unjustly missing.
ialsohaveadobro t1_j422tsq wrote
Reply to comment by jubmille2000 in Fyre (2019) The infamous rock festival conceived by an overly ambitious egotistical entrepreneur (CC) [01:25:28] by ghostmrchicken
Yes Rule Yes